GALAXIES, LOCAL SUPERCLUSTER GIULIANO GIURICIN A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The large-scale surveys of the last twenty years have verified the existence of large agglomerations of galaxies. The most conspicuous groupings can contain several clusters of galaxies, which explains why they have been given the name "superclusters." Some evidence of the existence of our own supercluster (dubbed the Local, or Virgo, Supercluster), where our Galaxy and the Local Group of galaxies reside, dates back to the earliest surveys of extragalactic nebulae made by William and John Herschel in the nineteenth century. However, the reality of the Local Supercluster has become generally accepted only in recent years. The surveys by the Herschels showed an excess of bright nebulae in the northern galactic hemisphere, a fact that reflects the outlying position of our galaxy with respect to nearby galaxies. In the 1920s, J.H. Reynolds and knut Lundmark noted a remarkable concentration of the largest nebulae along a great circle of the sphere, but drew no conclusion from this. (At that time several astronomers were not yet convinced that many nebulae were external galaxies.) The French astronomer Gerard de Vaucouleurs of the University of Texas at Austin was the first to describe and define the Local Supercluster. He proposed that the concentration of the brightest galaxies along a great circle of the sphere was the trace of a flat supersystem (the Local Supercluster) centered in the Virgo cluster, which has a diameter of a few megaparsecs (Mpc) and is about 10 Mpc away (1 Mpc =3.26 million light-years). [In the present article we adopt a value of 100 km s** Mpc** for the Hubble constant in the relationship (Hubble's law) between the redshift observed in a galaxy's spectrum and the galaxy's distance; a change in the value of the Hubble constant alters the spatial scale.] The Local Supercluster was found to contain also several tens of galaxy groups, along with single galaxies scattered among them. THE COMPONENTS OF THE LOCAL SUPERCLUSTER A first rough idea of the structure of the Local Supercluster can be an obtained by inspecting the two-dimensional distribution of bright galaxies (i.e., the location of galaxies projected onto the globe of the sky, without any indication of the distance of each). The distribution of -1280 galaxies (brighter than about the thirteenth photographic magnitude), taken from the Harvard surveys of Harlow Shapley and Adelaide Ames (published in the 1930s), clearly reveals the Virgo cluster (at galactic longitude 1-280ø and galactic latitude b-75ø) and the Ursa Major cloud (which extends from a region near the galactic pole to 1-140ø, b-50ø) in the northern hemisphere (see Fig. 1). Galaxies in the region marked by contour A probably form a system that does not belong to the Local Supercluster because they have, in general, higher redshifts. The axis corresponding to the dense chain of galaxies that contains the Virgo cluster, called the supergalactic equator by de Vaucouleurs, is shown by a curve in Fig. 1. The supergalactic longitude is counted along the supergalactic equator from its intersection with the galactic equator at 1-137ø. The southern galactic hemisphere is less populous than the northern; the two most striking features, denoted by contours B (the so-called south galactic chain) and C, deviate from the supergalactic equator and may be considered to be distant, separate superclusters. If we omit these structures, there is some concentration along the supergalactic equator. In the zone below 20ø galactic latitude, the relative lack of galaxies is due to the absorption of light by the disk of our own galaxy. A much better description of the Local Supercluster is made possible if we know the three-dimensional distribution of nearby galaxies, as derived from their positions as well as from their redshifts. In this case, one often simply assumes that the redshifts measure distances fairly well (according to Hubble's law); this is true if there are no large systematic deviations from Hubble's law. Two basic sources of information for the positions and radial velocities of bright (nearby) galaxies in the whole sky are the catalogs of bright galaxies published in the 1980s, the Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog of Bright Galaxies by Allan Sandage and Gustav A. Tammann and the Nearby Galaxy Catalog (NBG) by R. Brent Tully. From the system of polar supergalactic coordinates [supergalactic longitude (SGL), supergalactic latitude (SGB), distance] it is useful to derive orthogonal Cartesian supergalactic coordinates (SGX, SGY, SGZ): the Sun is at the origin; the SGX axis, defined by the intersection of the galactic and supergalactic planes, is aligned toward SGL=0ø, SGB=0ø; the SGY axis is roughly in the direction of the Virgo cluster (it is aligned toward SGL=90ø, SGB=0ø); and the SGZ axis is perpendicular to the supergalactic plane and points in the direction of SGB=90ø. The positive SGY axis is only 6ø removed from the north galactic pole, and the SGX-SGZ plane is almost coincident with the plane of the Galaxy. Our galaxy thus would be seen almost face-on from the center of the Local Supercluster. Figure 2 shows the projection of all (-1260) northern galaxies of the NBC catalog onto the SGX-SGZ plane. The viewer is located in the plane of the supercluster's equator. The disk of the Local Supercluster stretches across the middle of the diagram. The Virgo cluster is the densest concentration of galaxies, somewhat to the left with respect to the center of the figure; to the left of the Virgo cluster is the "southern extension" (also called the Virgo II cloud) and to its right is the Ursa Major cloud (also called the Canes Venatici cloud), which is the largest cloud in the Local Supercluster and the one in which we reside. There are also some clouds located off the supergalactic plane. A schematic picture of the Local Supercluster in three dimensions is shown in Fig. 3: Some major clouds (Virgo III, Crater, Canes Venatici spur, Leo II) lie off the supergalactic plane, which is essentially formed by the Virgo cluster and the Virgo II and Canes Venatici clouds. In general, it is possible to distinguish three components of the Local Supercluster: the Virgo cluster, the "disk" (i.e., the galaxies distributed along a thin layer coinciding with the supergalactic plane), and the "halo" (galaxies that are distributed roughly spherically, considerably off the plane). Of the NBG galaxies, roughly 40% belong to the halo component; of the remaining 60%, one-third belong to the Virgo cluster and two-thirds to the disk component, which contains the two extended clouds (Canes Venatici and Virgo II). Taken together, these clouds display a structure that is flattened in the ratio SGX:SGY:SGZ =6:3:1. The thickness of the disk of the Local Supercluster (the short axis) is very thin (-1 Mpc). The vast majority of (disk and halo) bright galaxies reside in a small number of clouds; the number density of bright galaxies falls off as 1/d2, where d is the distance from the Virgo cluster. Collectively, these clouds occupy a very small fraction of the volume of the Local Supercluster (most of the space is empty). Within the clouds, on the smallest scale we can identify groups (which are mostly bound systems of galaxies) that together contain about 70% of the galaxies of the NBC catalog, if the Virgo members are included. Remarkably, only -1% of the galaxies appear to be isolated (outside clouds). The internal motions of galaxies in most of the various large clouds of the Local Supercluster are small (less than 100 km s** along the line of sight). Hence, individual member galaxies can have crossed only a relatively small portion of the cloud in the billions of years since the galaxies came into being, which suggests that little mixing can have occurred in the supercluster as a whole. This fact gives insight into evolutionary history that is simply not obtainable at scales smaller than those of superclusters (i.e., in groups and clusters, where the original distribution of matter tends to be smeared out by evolutionary mixing). Elliptical and lenticular galaxies have a tendency to be located in the high-density regions of the Local Supercluster, whereas early-type spiral galaxies tend to be found in regions of intermediate density, and late-type spiral and irregular galaxies in regions of low density. MOTIONS OF GALAXIES IN THE LOCAL SUPERCLUSTER A better approach to the mapping of the distribution of the galaxies in space is to estimate galaxy distances from a variety of redshift-independent distance indicators. The two most widely used distance indicators are the stellar velocity dispersion in an elliptical galaxy and the width of the neutral-hydrogen emission line (observed at the 21-cm radio wavelength) in a spiral galaxy. The use of redshift- independence distance indicators has the advantage of avoiding the assumption that galaxies strictly obey Hubble's law and allowing us to map the (non-Hubble) peculiar motions of galaxies. A galaxy's peculiar motion is found by subtracting from its observed radial velocity the fraction of its recession velocity attributable to cosmic expansion (according to Hubble's law and a redshift-independent estimate of the galaxy's distance) within a velocity reference system (e.g., that defined by the cosmic microwave background). In recent years, spectroscopy and photometry of large samples of galaxies showed that, in the cosmic microwave background rest frame, the peculiar motions of the galaxies of the Local Supercluster (including our Local Group) and of a few nearby superclusters can best be fitted by a flow (mostly at a velocity of -600 km s**) towards a great mass concentration (dubbed "The Great Attractor") centered on the galactic coordinates 1-310ø, b-10ø (in the Centaurus region) at a distance of -40 Mpc. There seems to be a large concentration of galaxy clusters in the vicinity of the Great Attractor but, unfortunately, much of this grouping lies behind the obscuring dusty plane of the Milky Way. Additional Reading Burns, J.O.(1986). Very large structures in the universe. Scientific American 255 (No. 1) 38. Dressler, A.(1987). The large scale streaming of galaxies. Scientific American 257 (No. 3) 46. Gregory, S.A. and Thompson, L.A.(1982). Superclusters and voids in the distribution of galaxies. Scientific American 246 (No. 3) 106. Oort, J.H.(1983). Superclusters. Ann. Rev. Astron. Ap. 21 373. Silk, J., Szalay, A.S., and Zeldovich, Y.B.(1983). The large scale structure of the universe. Scientific American 249 (No. 4) 72.