Adapted from P. Coles, 1999, The Routledge Critical
Dictionary of the New Cosmology, Routledge Inc., New York. Reprinted
with the author's permission. To order this book click here:
http://www.routledge-ny.com/books.cfm?isbn=0415923549
Fields associated with the electromagnetic
interaction. Although the strongest fundamental interaction on the
large scales relevant to cosmology is gravity, there are
situations in
which magnetic fields play an important role. The Earth has a
significant magnetic field, as does the Sun. Galaxies like the Milky
Way also possess a large-scale magnetic field (with a strength of a
few microgauss) and there is evidence for magnetic fields in the
intergalactic medium, particularly inside rich clusters of galaxies
(see large-scale structure). Active galaxies also show
evidence of strong magnetic effects: radio galaxies, for example, produce
synchrotron radiation as electrons spiral around the magnetic field
lines.
The magnetic fields in galaxies are thought to arise from a dynamo
effect: a small initial field, generated perhaps by turbulence,
becomes amplified and ordered as it is wound up by the rotation of the
galactic disk. Although this is a plausible model for the generation
of the fields observed, there are some problems with it. For example,
it is not clear whether typical spiral galaxies have experienced
enough rotation in the age of the Universe for the fields to have been
sufficiently amplified. Moreover, some objects at very high redshifts,
such as the damped Lyman-alpha systems seen in quasar spectra, appear
also to possess magnetic fields strong enough to produce a
characteristic Faraday rotation of the polarisation of electromagnetic
radiation passing through them. The detailed mechanism by which these
astrophysical magnetic fields may have been generated has yet to be
elucidated in a completely satisfactory fashion.
It has also been speculated that there might be a cosmological
magnetic field pervading the Universe that could have been generated
early on in the thermal history of the Universe as a result of
primordial phase transitions. If such a field exists, it must be very
weak. Since magnetic fields are vector fields, they possess direction
as well as strength. The resulting pressure forces would have caused
the Universe to expand more quickly in some directions than in others,
so a large-scale cosmological field would produce an anisotropic
cosmological model. This is one of the few situations where physically
realistic exact solutions of the Einstein equations of general
relativity can be obtained that do not invoke the cosmological
principle. However, the observed near-isotropy of the cosmic
microwave background radiation means that a large-scale coherent
magnetic field would have to be very weak.
A cosmological magnetic field need not, however, be uniform: it
might be tangled up on a relatively small scale so that the effects of
its anisotropy are not evident on large scales. Even this kind of
field would have to be very weak. A tangled web of field lines acts as
a source of pressure which behaves in a very similar way to the
pressure of radiation. Any such field present at the time of
nucleosynthesis, for example, would alter the rate of
expansion of the
Universe at that epoch, and the observed light element abundances
would no longer agree with our theoretical calculations. We can argue,
though, that the observed agreement requires the cosmological magnetic
field to contribute no more than one part in a million to the total
energy density of the Universe.
Although there are thus tight limits on the strengths of galactic or
cosmic magnetic fields, they could, in principle at least, oblige us
to modify any models based on the assumption that gravity alone is
relevant. For example, we usually estimate the amount of dark matter
ingalaxies by using the virial theorem. If galactic magnetic fields
were sufficiently strong, they could significantly alter the form of
the equilibrium configuration of galaxies by introducing a pressure
force independent of the gas pressure and gravity.
FURTHER READING:
Parker, E.N., Cosmical Magnetic Fields (Clarendon Press, Oxford,
1979).
MAGNETIC FIELDS