Next Contents Previous


The story begins in 1933 with Jansky's discovery of the radio emission from the Galaxy. It was immediately apparent that, on large angular scales, the radio sky is dominated by diffuse Galactic emission. As is well known, this great discovery caused little stir in the astronomical community and it was only after the Second World War that the nature and origin of the radio background emission became the object of astronomical interest. By the late 1940s, the emission mechanism was identified as synchrotron radiation and, at about the same time, the first of the discrete radio sources was identified.

At that period, one of the principal motivations for attempting to extract the diffuse extragalactic component of the radio background radiation was related to the question of the distances and luminosities of the discrete radio sources which continued to be discovered as the sky surveys discovered more and more faint sources. The argument is a well-known one and goes as follows. Suppose the sources have typical luminosities Lnu and space densities rhoL. Then the diffuse background emission due to a uniform cosmological distribution of these sources is

Equation 1

On the other hand, if we also measure the number of sources brighter that a given flux density S, N(geq S), that number is given by

Equation 2

Since the observed background intensity Inu is an upper limit to the integrated intensity, and N (geq S) is fixed, we can find a lower limit to Lnu. This was the argument used by Martin Ryle to demonstrate reasonably convincingly that the bulk of the discrete radio sources had to be distant extragalactic objects. It was also the motivation for attempting to disentangle the intensity of the isotropic radio background emission from the anisotropic Galactic radio emission which was much more intense. This was a very difficult observational programme and several generations of Cambridge research students were almost broken in attempting to find a credible result.

The problem is that the radio sky is dominated by the synchrotron emission of our own Galaxy as is beautifully demonstrated by the map of the whole sky due to Glyn Haslam and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy at Bonn. As a result, wherever one looks in the sky, there is always intense radiation in the far out sidelobes of the radio telescope. The best one can do is to map the sky at different wavelengths with geometrically scaled antennae so that although the sidelobe problem is not eliminated, at least it should be the same at different frequencies. What one observes on the sky is

Equation 3

where the first term on the right-hand side represents the anisotropic component associated with the Galaxy and the term I0(v) represents the isotropic extragalactic component. The procedure is then to map the sky at different frequencies, assume that the anisotropic component has the same radio spectrum in all directions and then find I0(nu). The procedure only works because the Galactic continuum spectrum is different from that of the diffuse extragalactic component, specifically, the spectrum of our Galaxy having the form Inu propto nu-0.4 at frequencies less than about 200 MHz whereas the extragalactic sources have much steeper spectra.

The best results are still those presented by Bridle (1967). It is convenient to express the results in terms of the brightness temperature of the radiation Tb = (lambda2 / 2k) Inu. At the traditional wavelength of 178 MHz, the frequency of the revised 3C Catalogue, the results are a follows. The minimum sky temperature at 178 MHz is about 80 K and includes both the minimum Galactic component as well as the isotropic component. As the errors build up, it is not possible to determine both the intensity and spectrum of the extragalactic component and so the isotropic component is extracted assuming different values for the radio spectral index. If alpha = 0.75, the isotropic background temperature is 30 ± 7 K; if alpha = 0.9, the intensity corresponds to 15 ± 3 K. The typical spectral index of radio sources at 178 MHz is about alpha = 0.8.

These figures should be compared with the brightness temperature found when the source counts are integrated to the lowest flux densities observed. The integrated background emission to sub-millijansky levels corresponds to about 20 K. It is interesting to identify the principal contributors to the discrete source background on the basis of modeling the source counts. If we simply adopt the local radio luminosity function for extragalactic radio sources and assume that there was no evolution of the population with cosmic epoch, we would expect a radio background at 178 MHz of only about 1-2 K. When the effects of strong evolution of the source population is taken into account, the background emission from the evolving component of the population increases to about 16-19 K. To these components we have to add the contribution of normal galaxies which amounts to about 4 K and the low luminosity `starburst' galaxies which probably contribute a further few K to the total background.

Thus, it seems that virtually all the radio background emission can be attributed to discrete sources and there is not much room left for any other contribution to the background radio emission at low frequencies. One contribution of possible cosmological interest is the upper limit to the intensity of intergalactic bremsstrahlung which would have a flat radio spectrum, Inu propto nu0. As a result, the best limit comes from observations at about the minimum of the radio background emission which occurs at about 400 MHz because at higher frequencies, the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation becomes the dominant component. Once the discrete source component of the background and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation are removed, the upper limit to any residual diffuse component would amount to about T400 MHz leq 0.1 K.

What all of this means is not my job - John Peacock will take up the story of the astrophysical and cosmological implications of these observations. I will end this story with two footnotes. The first is the touching story reported by Jasper Wall at the 1989 Heidelburg meeting on the Galactic and Extragalactic Background Radiation (Wall 1990). In 1964, Jasper and Donald Chu were attempting to measure the background radiation at a frequencies of 320 and 707 MHz. They found to their distress that they could not obtain the `right' answer - their background spectrum was too flat (Wall, Chu and Yen 1970). As research students, the tacit assumption was made that they had simply made some error in the calibration of their experiment. Only in the next year was the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation reported which accounted for their excess antenna temperature.

The second footnote concerns the extragalactic background emission at very long wavelengths, 1 - 10 MHz. This is an even more unfashionable waveband because the observations are very difficult to make because of ionospheric absorption and refraction. However, at certain locations in the auroral zone, it is possible to observe the sky at 10 MHz. In the 1960s Chris Purton and Alan Bridle did as good a job as could be done at that time at these very low frequencies from the Penticton Radio Observatory (Bridle and Purton 1968). The sky is still dominated by the synchrotron emission of the Galaxy but, because of the differences in spectral indices, the extragalactic component is relatively more important. The process which becomes important at these low frequencies is bremsstrahlung absorption so that, at 10 MHz, the Galactic plane is observed in absorption (Purton 1966). As observations are made at frequencies less than 10 MHz, the distance at which the bremsstrahlung optical depth becomes unity decreases. The spectrum of the background radiation in the region of the Galactic pole has, however, been determined from the Canadian RAE1 satellite and the shape of the extragalactic component of the background was determined (Clark et al. 1970). Evidence was found that the extragalactic spectrum showed a cut-off at low frequencies, nu leq < 3 MHz (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2. The spectrum of the radio sky in the direction of the `north halo minimum'. The solid line shows the best fit to the total background. The dotted line shows the Galactic contribution and the dashed line the estimated extragalactic contribution, the shaded region indicating the uncertainties in the latter estimate. Independent estimates of the extragalactic background are also shown. (From Simon 1977).

The origin of this behavior was discussed by Simon (1977). The obvious interpretation of the cut-off is that it is associated with synchrotron self-absorption in the discrete sources which make up the background. She studied the predicted spectra of a complete sample of 3CR radio sources to very low frequencies for which detailed radio structural information was available. Compact components and hot spots become synchrotron self-absorbed at frequencies nu geq 100 MHz and the only components which contribute to the 1 - 10 MHz background radiation are the most diffuse components. Because of the strong inverse correlation between diffuse structure and radio luminosity, the greatest contributions to the background in the 1-10 MHz waveband come from relatively low luminosity sources (Fig. 3). Simon evaluated the predicted background spectrum when account was taken of the cosmological evolution of these sources and found that she could account quite naturally for the inferred turn-over in the isotropic radio background spectrum.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The relation between radio luminosity at 408 MHz and the frequency at which the radio source is expected to exhibit synchrotron self-absorption. The radio sources form a representative sample of the radio sources in the 3CR catalogue. (From Simon 1977).

Next Contents Previous