![]() | Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1999. 37:
409-443 Copyright © 1999 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved |
It is interesting that in all three sources where
(the angle between the line of sight and the axis of ejection) has been
determined,
a large value is found (that is, the axis of ejection is close to the plane
of the sky). These values are
79° (SS 433,
Margon 1984),
66°- 70°
(GRS 1915+105,
Mirabel &
Rodríguez 1994,
Fender et al 1999),
85°
(GRO J1655-40,
Hjellming & Rupen
1995), and
70° for the remaining sources. This result is not inconsistent with
the statistical
expectation since the probability of finding a source with a given
is proportional to
sin
. We then expect to
find as many objects in the 60°
90° range as in the
0°
60° range. However,
this argument suggests that we should eventually detect objects with a
small
. For objects with
10° we expect the
timescales to be shortened by
2
and the
flux densities to be boosted by 8
3
with respect to the values in the rest frame of the condensation. For
instance, for motions with v = 0.98c
(
= 5), the
timescale will shorten by a factor of ~ 10 and the flux densities will
be boosted by a factor of ~ 103. Then, for a galactic source
with relativistic jets and small
we expect fast and intense variations in the observed flux. These
microblazars
may be quite hard to detect in practice, both because of the low probability
of small
values and because of the fast decline in the flux.
Gamma-ray bursts are at cosmological distances and ultra-relativistic
bulk motion and beaming appear as essential ingredients to solve the
enormous energy requirements (e.g.
Kulkarni et al 1999,
Castro-Tirado et al
1999).
Beaming reduces the energy release by the beaming factor f =
/
4
, where
is the solid angle of the beamed emission. Additionally, the photon energies
can be boosted to higher values. Extreme flows from collapsars with bulk
Lorentz factors > 100 have been proposed as sources of
-ray bursts
(Mészáros &
Rees 1997). High collimation
(Dar 1998,
Pugliese et al 1999)
can be tested observationally
(Rhoads 1997),
since the statistical properties of the bursts will depend on the
viewing angle relative to the jet axis.
Recent studies of gamma-ray afterglows suggest that they are highly collimated jets. The brightness of the optical transient associated to GRB 990123 showed a break (Kulkarni et al 1999), and a steepening from a power law in time t proportional to t-1.2, ultimately approaching a slope t-2.5 (Castro-Tirado et al 1999). The achromatic steepening of the optical light curve and early radio flux decay of GRB 990510 are inconsistent with simple spherical expansion, and well fit by jet evolution (Harrison et al 1999). It is interesting that the power laws that describe the light curves of the ejecta in microquasars show similar breaks and steepening of the radio flux density (Section 7 Rodríguez & Mirabel 1999a). In microquasars, these breaks and steepenings have been interpreted (Hjellming & Johnston 1988) as a transition from slow intrinsic expansion followed by free expansion in two dimensions. Besides, linear polarizations of about 2% were recently measured in the optical afterglow of GRB 990510 (Covino et al 1999), providing strong evidence that the afterglow radiation from gamma-ray bursters is, at least in part, produced by synchrotron processes. Linear polarizations in the range of 2-10% have been measured in microquasars at radio (Rodríguez et al 1995, Hannikainen et al 1999), and optical (Scaltriti et al 1997) wavelengths.
In this context, microquasars in our own Galaxy seem
to be less extreme local analogs of the super-relativistic jets associated
to the more distant
-ray
bursters. However,
-ray
bursters are different to the microquasars found so far in our own Galaxy.
The former do not repeat and seem to be related to catastrophic events, and
have much larger super-Eddington luminosities. Therefore, the scaling laws
in terms of the black hole mass that are valid in the analogy between
microquasars and quasars do not seem to apply in the case of
-ray bursters.