4.5. ON ANGULAR MOMENTUM EXCHANGE AND THE ROLE OF RESONANCES:
THE ANALYTIC APPROACH
Two papers are the pillars of the analytical work on angular momentum
redistribution in disk galaxies - namely
Lynden-Bell & Kalnajs
(1972)
and
Tremaine & Weinberg
(1984)
- while further useful information can be found in, e.g.,
Kalnajs (1971),
Dekker (1974),
Weinberg (1985,
1994),
Athanassoula (2003),
Fuchs (2004),
Fuchs & Athanassoula
(2005).
In order to reach tractable analytic expressions, it is necessary to
consider the disk and the spheroid components separately, and use
different approximations in the two cases. For the disk we can use the
epicyclic approximation (i.e., we will assume that the disk orbits can
be reasonably well approximated by epicycles), while for the spheroid we
will assume that the distribution function depends only on the energy,
as is the case for spherical isotropic systems. The main results
obtained in the papers listed above are:
- Angular momentum is emitted or absorbed
mainly at resonances. It is, however, also possible to emit or absorb
away from resonances if the potential is not stationary, but grows or
decays with time. Nevertheless, the contribution of the non-resonant
material to the total emission or absorption should remain small, unless
the growth or decay of the potential is important.
- In the disk component, angular momentum
is emitted from the ILR and at
other l < 0 resonances and absorbed at the OLR and at other
l > 0 resonances. It is also absorbed at CR, but, all else
being equal, at lesser quantities than at the Lindblad resonances.
- The spheroid absorbs angular momentum
at all its resonances.
- The global picture is thus that angular
momentum is emitted from the bar region and absorbed by the CR and OLR
in the disk, and by all resonances in the spheroid. Thus, angular
momentum is transported from the inner parts of the disk, to the part of
the disk outside CR and to the spheroid resonant regions.
- For both the disk and the spheroid
components it is possible to show
that, for the same perturbing potential and the same amount of resonant
material, a given resonance will emit or absorb more angular momentum if the
material there is colder (i.e., has a lower velocity dispersion). Therefore,
since the disk is always colder than the spheroid, it will absorb more
angular momentum per unit resonant mass. Nevertheless, the spheroid is
much more massive than the outer disk, so the amount of angular momentum
it absorbs may exceed that absorbed by the outer disk.
- Since the bar is inside corotation, it
has negative energy and angular momentum and as it emits angular
momentum it gets destabilised, i.e., it grows stronger. It is thus
expected that the more angular momentum is emitted, the stronger the bar
will become.