Everyone agrees that the ``simplest'' universe would be a flat
Einstein-de Sitter model. But we shall hear several claims during the
present meeting that this model is now hard to reconcile with the
data. Several lines of evidence suggest that gravitating CDM
contributes substantially less than
CDM = 1. The main
lines of evidence are
(i) The baryon fraction in clusters is 0.15-0.2, On the other hand,
the baryon contribution to omega is now pinned down by deuterium
measurements to be around
b = 0.015
h2, where h is the Hubble
constant in units of 100 km/sec/Mpc. If clusters are a fair
sample of the universe, then this is incompatible with a dark matter
density high enough to make
= 1.
(ii) The presence of clusters of galaxies with z = 1 is hard to
reconcile with the rapid recent growth of structure that would be
expected if CDM were unity.
(iii) The Supernova Hubble diagram (even though the case for actual acceleration may not be compelling) seems hard to reconcile with the large deceleration implied by an Einstein-de Sitter model.
(iv) The inferred ages of the oldest stars are only barely consistent with an Einstein-de Sitter model, for the favoured choices of Hubble constant.