|Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1994. 32:
Copyright © 1994 by . All rights reserved
Must we, as Solon advises, always keep the goal insight?
Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics
The s-process is the other major nucleosynthetic process that assembles heavy elements. We know that the s-process path in the neutron number-proton number plane crosses the neutron closed shells at the valley of beta stability. This tells us that the s-process occurred in an environment with a much lower neutron density than the r-process. Also, the s-process occurred over a much longer time period.
In this section we seek to understand how the s-process occurs. We then turn to the question of s-process sites. Finally we consider constraints on those sites.
4.1. The s-Process Mechanism
Because of the neutron densities and timescales inferred for the s-process from the abundance peaks, we can infer that the s-process is not a freeze out from equilibrium. Instead, it is a neutron-capture process that occurs in a system striving to reach equilibrium, but falling short of its goal. The main reactions carrying the bulk of the nuclei towards the iron group can liberate neutrons. Pre-existing seed nuclei capture these neutrons and produce the s-nuclei. The s-process is clearly a secondary process.
The dominant reactions that can liberate neutrons are 13C(, n)16O and 22Ne(, n)25Mg. In these reactions, the neutron-rich isotopes, 13C and 22Ne give up their excess neutrons to heavier nuclei. At this point, we may ask where these excess neutrons came from in the first place. The answer to this interesting question illustrates an important point about the overall nuclear evolution of the universe.
The abundances that emerge from the Big Bang are roughly 90% by number 1H and 10% 4He (e.g. Walker et al 1991). This yields Ye = 0.88. On the other hand, we may make the observation that 1H and 4He are the only proton-rich (that is, with proton number greater than neutron number) stable isotopes in nature. This means that in order for nature to put the nucleons in the universe into nuclei with the strongest binding energy per nucleon (iron-group nuclei), the Ye of the universe must decrease.
Most of the decrease in Ye comes from the weak decays in the p - p chains and the CNO cycle during hydrogen burning. These interactions drop Ye from 0.88 to 0.5 in material that has completed hydrogen burning. 4He itself does not have any excess neutrons, but some production of excess neutrons occurs in the CNO cycle due to reactions like 12C(p, ) 13N(+)13C. The net result is the conversion of a free proton into an excess neutron, and a drop in Ye. The 22Ne production builds up from abundant 14N produced in the CNO cycle. The sequence is 14N(, ) 18F(+) 18O(, ) 13Ne. Here it is the fact that the only stable isotope of flourine is neutron rich that leads to a decrease in Ye. We see that the excess neutrons in 13C and 22Ne are a consequence of the overall drive to decrease Ye in stars. We must keep the goal of the nuclei in sight to understand where the excess neutrons come from that drive the s-process.
The first attempts to understand the details of the s-process led to the classical model. The neutron density is always low in the s-process (compared to the r-process). If a nucleus is unstable to - decay following neutron capture in the s-process, it will almost always - decay to the first available stable isobar before it can capture another neutron. Thus, it generally suffices in s-process studies to follow only the abundances as a function of mass number, which only change by neutron capture. In this approximation, the rate of change of the abundance NA of nuclei with mass number A is
where nn is the neutron number density and <v>A is the thermally averaged neutron-capture cross section for the stable isobar of mass number A. We can write <v>A as A vT, where vT is the thermal velocity of neutrons and A is an average cross section, given in terms of vT. With the definition of the neutron exposure
Note that the neutron exposure is a fluence. It has units of inverse millibarns (1 barn = 10-24 cm2). Because it is a neutron flux integrated overtime, it is an appropriate evolutionary parameter for the s-process. If the s-process achieves a steady state, then dNA / d 0 and A NA constant.
Clayton et al (1961) were able to show that a single neutron exposure r could not reproduce the solar system's abundance of s-only nuclei. Seeger et al (1965) showed that an exponential distribution of exposures, given by
where f is a constant and N56 is the initial abundance of 56Fe seed, did reproduce the solar distribution of s-nuclei. For the distribution of exposures given in Equation (12), Clayton & Ward (1974) found that for an exponential average of flows in the s-process
A fit to the empirical A NA for s-only nuclei then gives the quantities f and .
A complication to the above classical model is the branching that occurs at certain isotopes. Here it may be that the - decay rate is not considerably greater than the neutron-capture rate. In some cases the nucleus may - decay before neutron capture and in others it may neutron capture before suffering - decay. The assumptions leading to Equation (9) thus break down. Ward et al (1976) developed an analytic treatment of branching in the case of a time-independent neutron flux. For time-dependent neutron fluxes, it is necessary in general to solve a full network of nuclei numerically (e.g. Howard et al 1986). Since the s-process branchings will in general be temperature and neutron density dependent, s-nuclei branchings are important diagnostics of the environment in which the s-process occurred. We will see this in more detail in Section 4.3.