Next Contents Previous

2.1. Weak Equilibrium and the he Abundance

Consider now those early epochs when the Universe was only a few tenths of a second old and the radiation filling it was at a temperature (thermal energy) of a few MeV. According to the standard model, at those early times the Universe was a hot, dense ``soup'' of relativistic particles (photons, e± pairs, 3 ``flavors'' (e, µ, tau) of neutrino-antineutrino pairs) along with a trace amount (at the level of a few parts in 1010) of neutrons and protons. At such high temperatures and densities both the weak and nuclear reaction rates are sufficiently rapid (compared to the early Universe expansion rate) that all particles have come to equilibrium. A key consequence of equilibrium is that the earlier history of the evolution of the Universe is irrelevant for an understanding of BBN. When the temperature drops below a few MeV the weakly interacting neutrinos effectively decouple from the photons and e± pairs, but they still play an important role in regulating the neutron-to-proton ratio.

At high temperatures, neutrons and protons are continuously interconverting via the weak interactions: n + e+ <-> p + nubare, n + nubare <-> p + e-, and n <-> p + e- + nubare. When the interconversion rate is faster than the expansion rate, the neutron-to-proton ratio tracks its equilibrium value, decreasing exponentially with temperature (n / p = e-Deltam / T, where Deltam = 1.29 MeV is the neutron-proton mass difference). A comparison of the weak rates with the universal expansion rate reveals that equilibrium may be maintained until the temperature drops below ~ 0.8 MeV. When the interconversion rate becomes less than the expansion rate, the n/p ratio effectively ``freezes-out'' (at a value of approx 1/6), thereafter decreasing slowly, mainly due to free neutron decay.

Although n/p freeze-out occurs at a temperature below the deuterium binding energy, EB = 2.2 MeV, the first link in the nucleosynthetic chain, p + n -> D + gamma, is ineffective in jump-starting BBN since the photodestruction rate of deuterium (propto ngamma e-EB / T) is much larger than the deuterium production rate (propto nB) due to the very large universal photon-to-baryon ratio (gtapprox 109). Thus, the Universe must ``wait'' until there are so few sufficiently energetic photons that deuterium becomes effectively stable against photodissociation. This occurs for temperatures ltapprox 80 keV, at which time neutrons are rapidly incorporated into he with an efficiency of 99.99%. This efficiency is driven by the tight binding of the 4He nucleus, along with the roadblock to further nucleosynthesis imposed by the absence of a stable nucleus at mass-5. By this time (T ltapprox 80 keV), the n/p ratio has dropped to ~ 1/7, and simple counting (2 neutrons in every 4He nucleus) yields an estimated primordial 4He mass fraction

Equation 8 (8)

As a result of its large binding energy and the gap at mass-5, the primordial abundance of 4He is relatively insensitive to the nuclear reaction rates and, therefore, to the baryon abundance (eta). As may be seen in Figure 1, while eta varies by orders of magnitude, the predicted 4He mass fraction, YP, changes by factors of only a few. Indeed, for 1 leq eta10 leq 10, 0.22 leq YP leq 0.25. As may be seen in Figures 1 and 2, there is a very slight increase in YP with eta. This is mainly due to BBN beginning earlier, when there are more neutrons available to form 4He, if the baryon-to-photon ratio is higher. The increase in YP with eta is logarithmic; over most of the interesting range in eta, DeltaYP approx 0.01 Deltaeta / eta.

Figure 2

Figure 2. The predicted 4He abundance (solid curve) and the 2sigma theoretical uncertainty [3]. The horizontal lines show the range indicated by the observational data.

The 4He abundance is, however, sensitive to the competition between the universal expansion rate (H) and the weak interaction rate (interconverting neutrons and protons). If the early Universe should expand faster than predicted for the standard model, the weak interactions will drop out of equilibrium earlier, at a higher temperature, when the n/p ratio is higher. In this case, more neutrons will be available to be incorporated into 4He and YP will increase. Numerical calculations show that for a modest speed-up (DeltaNnu ltapprox 1), DeltaYP approx 0.013 DeltaNnu. Hence, constraints on YP (and eta) lead directly to bounds on DeltaNnu and, on particle physics beyond the standard model [1].

It should be noted that the uncertainty in the BBN-predicted mass fraction of 4He is very small and almost entirely dominated by the (small) uncertainty in the n - p interconversion rates. These rates may be ``normalized'' through the neutron lifetime, taun, whose current standard value is 887 ± 2 s (actually, 886.7 ± 1.9 s). To very good accuracy, a 1 s uncertainty in taun corresponds to an uncertainty in YP of order 2 x 10-4. At this tiny level of uncertainty it is important to include finite mass, zero- and finite-temperature radiative corrections, and Coulomb corrections to the weak rates. However, within the last few years it emerged that the largest error in the BBN-prediction of YP was due to a too large time-step in the numerical code. With this now under control, it is estimated that the residual theoretical uncertainty (in addition to that from the uncertainty in taun) is of the order of 2 parts in 104. Indeed, a comparison of two major, independent BBN codes reveals agreement in the predicted values of YP to 0.0001 ± 0.0001 over the entire range 1 leq eta10 leq 10. In Figure 2 is shown the BBN-predicted he mass fraction, YP, as a function of eta; the thickness of the band is the ±2sigma theoretical uncertainty. For eta10 gtapprox 2 the 1sigma theoretical uncertainty in Yp is ltapprox 6 x 10-4. As we will soon see, the current observational uncertainties in YP are much larger (see, also, Fig. 2).

Next Contents Previous