The availability of stellar masses for all types enables the
construction of a powerful evolutionary plot, analogous to
Figure 6, involving the stellar
mass density,
stars(z,
T),
as a function of morphology T. Whilst the stellar mass density
can grow by continued star formation, unlike the UV
luminosity density,
UV, it is
difficult to imagine how
it can decline. As we saw earlier
UV can decline
significantly in only 1-2 Gyr because of an abrupt truncation of
activity. However, such a change would have very little effect on
the infrared output as illustrated in
Figure 13.
Brinchmann and
Ellis (2000)
secured K luminosities and
optical-IR SEDS for over 300 galaxies in the CFRS/LDSS and Hawaii
survey fields and derive
stars(z,
T) (Figure 15).
Estimating the integrated stellar mass density is prone to all of
the difficulties reviewed earlier for the luminosity density and
there is the added complication that the redshift surveys in
question are optically-selected and thus must miss some
(red) fraction of a true K-limited sample. Accordingly, the mass
densities derived are lower limits to the true values.
![]() |
Figure 15. Evolution of the stellar mass density
|
Remarkably,
stars(z,
T) is a declining function for the
intriguing population of morphologically-peculiar galaxies.
Whereas the declining UV luminosity density could imply a fading
population, such an explanation cannot be consistent with
Figure 15 which argues, instead, that the
objects are genuinely
disappearing into other systems. The most logical explanation for
their declining contribution to the stellar mass density is that
morphologically-peculiar objects are being transformed, e.g. by
mergers, into regular objects.
![]() |
Figure 16. An increase in the merger fraction as a function of redshift from the HST analysis of LeFevre et al (2000). Galaxies of known redshift were examined for satellites brighter than a fixed rest-frame luminosity within a projected radius of 20 h-1 kpc and corrections made for unrelated line-of-sight contamination. This redshift-dependent merger rate was adopted by Brinchmann & Ellis (2000) in Figure 15. |
Merging has been an attractive means for governing the evolution of
galaxies for many years
([Toomre &
Toomre 1972,
Rocca-Volmerange &
Guiderdoni 1989,
Broadhurst et al
1992])
and of course is fundamental to the hierarchical formation picture.
However it has been extremely difficult to determine the observed
rate at intermediate redshift. The fundamental problem is that we
observe galaxies at various look-back times via discrete
`snapshots' without ever being able to prove two associated
systems are destined to merge on a particular timescale. Using the
CFRS/LDSS HST dataset referred to earlier,
LeFevre et al
(2000)
undertook a quantitative survey of the fraction of luminous
galaxies with satellites brighter than a fixed absolute magnitude
within a 20 h-1 kpc metric radius and, after allowance for
projection effects, determined the merger fraction increases
with redshift as
(1 + z)3.4 ± 0.5 - a result
consistent with earlier ground-based efforts. Sadly, it is not
straightforward to convert the proportion of galaxies with
associated sources into a physical merger rate or, as ideally
required, a mass assembly rate without some indication of the
dynamical timescale for each merger and the mass of each
satellite. Moreover, there are several annoying biases that affect
even the derived merger fraction.
Brinchmann &
Ellis (2000)
attempted to reconcile the decline of
the morphologically-peculiar population, the redshift dependence
of the LeFevre et al merger fraction and associated evidence for
continued formation of ellipticals
([Menanteau
et al 2000])
into a
simple self-consistent picture. They transferred the dominant
population of morphologically-irregular galaxies, via the
z-dependent merger rate, into a growth in the regular galaxies
(shaded area of Figure 15). This is clearly a
simplistic view, but
nonetheless, gives a crude empirical rate at which regular galaxies
are assembling. If correct, how does this agree with mass assembly
histories predicted, say in CDM?
Figure 17 shows a recent prediction of the assembly history of spheroids and disks (Frenk, private communication). Although there are some discrepancies between this and its equivalent prediction from Kauffmann & Charlot (1998, Figure 3), the trends are clear. The strongest evolutionary signal is expected in terms of a recent assembly of massive spheroids; the equivalent growth rate in stellar disks is more modest. To the extent it is currently possible to test this picture, the qualitative trend is supported by the data. Field ellipticals are certainly still assembling ([Menanteau et al 2000]) but perhaps more slowly than expected according to Figure 17; unfortunately deeper samples with redshifts are needed for a precise statement. Brinchmann (in prep.) has examined the stellar mass growth rate in disks using the infrared-based method over 0 < z < 1 and finds only modest changes. This is very much a developing area and one that would benefit from significantly enlarged HST datasets chosen to overlap the growing faint redshift survey databases.
The HST data, particularly that in the Hubble Deep Fields (HDF), is an astonishingly rich resource which is still not completely exploited. As an indication of what might be possible with future instrumentation, I will close with some remarks on the important role that bulges and bars may play in the history of the Hubble sequence.
50% of local spirals have bars which are thought to originate
through dynamical instabilities in well-established
differentially-rotating stellar disks. If we could determine the
epoch at which bars begin appearing, conceivably this would shed
some light on how recently mature spirals came to be. Via careful
simulations based on local examples,
Abraham et al
(1999)
showed that face-on barred galaxies should be recognisable to z
1
in the HDF exposures. In fact, many are seen
(Figure 18) but
tantalisingly the barred fraction of face-on spirals appears to
drop beyond a redshift z
0.6. The effect is marginal but
illustrative of a powerful future use of morphological imaging
with the Advanced Camera for Surveys.
![]() |
Figure 18. Face-on barred spirals of known
redshift in the Hubble Deep Field.
Abraham et al
(1999)
claim that all such systems should easily be recognised to z
|
The story with bulges is also unclear, although potentially equally exciting. Traditionally, bulges were thought to represent miniature ellipticals which formed monolithically at high redshift ([Eggen, Lynden-Bell & Sandage 1962]). Detailed studies of local examples, including the Galactic bulge, have shown a considerable diversity in properties, both in integrated color and even in their photometric structure ([Wyse 1999]). There is some evidence of a bimodality in the population; prominent bulges in early type spirals share surface brightness characteristics of ellipticals, whereas those in late-type spirals are closer to exponential disks. This might indicate two formation mechanisms, one primordial (as in the traditional picture), the other related perhaps to the merging assembly history or via disk instabilities through what is termed `secular' evolution.
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 19. The remarkable diversity of intermediate redshift spiral bulges in the Hubble Deep Fields as revealed in the analysis of Ellis et al (2000). (Top) Selected face-on spirals in the HDF with pixel-by-pixel BVI color distributions. The marked points represent various aperture selections which serve to define the mean bulge color; in each case the bulge remains the reddest part of the spiral galaxies. (bottom) V - I aperture color for bulges (open circles) and integrated color for ellipticals (filled circles) versus redshift. Bulges are generally more diverse with a mean color bluer than their elliptical counterparts. Curves illustrate that a continued infall of 5% by mass over 1-2 Gyr timescales could explain the observed trends. |
Taking advantage of the HDF images, including those from NICMOS,
Ellis et al (2000)
have examined the color distribution for a
large sample of spirals bulges of known redshift and compared
these colors with their integrated equivalent for the HDF
ellipticals. If bulges are miniature ellipticals formed at high
redshift, one would expect similar trends. Interestingly, in the
hierarchical picture, one expects bulges to be older and
presumably redder than ellipticals (since the latter predominantly
form from merged disk systems which most likely contain bulges as
early merger remnants).
Ellis et al (2000)
find intermediate
redshift bulges are the reddest part of a typical spiral but,
surprisingly, they are often bluer than their elliptical
counterparts and far less homogeneous as a population.
Contamination from disk light is an obvious concern though
simulations suggest only modest bias arises to redshifts where
these trends become prominent. What could be responsible for this
puzzling behavior? Evolutionary synthesis modelling suggest only a
modest amount of star formation corresponding to continued infall
of 5% by mass would be needed
to explain the bluing.