3.3 m and
from Type Ia Supernovae
The use of type Ia supernovae for measuring cosmological parameters is
covered elsewhere in this volume by Filippenko (nearby supernovae and
determinations of H0) and by Perlmutter (distant
supernovae and
m and
). Hence, these objects will
not be discussed in much detail here, except to highlight their
potential, and to summarize some of the main difficulties associated
with them so that they can be compared relative to some of the other
methods discussed in this review.
The obvious advantage of type Ia supernovae is the small dispersion in
the Hubble diagram, particularly after accounting for differences in
the overall shapes or slopes of the light curves
(Phillips 1993;
Hamuy et al. 1995:
Reiss, Press &
Kirshner 1997).
In principle,
separation of the effects of deceleration or a potential non-zero
cosmological constant is straightforward, provided that (eventually)
supernovae at redshifts of order unity can be measured with sufficient
signal-to-noise and resolution against the background of the parent
galaxies. The differences in the observed effects of m
and
become increasingly easier
to measure at
redshifts exceeding ~ 0.5. In principle, the evolution of single
stars should be simpler than that of entire galaxies (that have been
used for such measurements in the past).
At the present time, however, it is difficult to place any
quantitative limits on the expected evolutionary effects for type Ia
supernovae since the progenitors for these objects have not yet been
unequivocally identified. Moreover, there may be potential
differences in the chemical compositions of supernovae observed now
and those observed at earlier epochs. In principle, such differences
could be tested for empirically (as is being done for Cepheid
variables, for example). It is also necessary to correct for
obscuration due to dust (although in general, at least in the halos of
galaxies, these effects are likely to be small; a minor worry might be
that the properties of the dust could evolve over time). In detail,
establishing accurate K-corrections for high-redshift supernovae,
measuring reddenings, and correcting for potential evolutionary
effects will be challenging, although, with the exception of
measurements of the cosmic microwave background anisotropies
(discussed in Section 9 below), type Ia
supernovae may offer the best
potential for measuring m and
.
The most recent results based on type Ia supernovae (Perlmutter et al. 1997 are encouraging, and they demonstrate that rapid progress is likely to be made in the near future. Currently, the published sample size is limited to 7 objects; however, many more objects have now been discovered. The feasibility of discovering these high-redshift supernovae with high efficiency has unquestionably been demonstrated (e.g. Perlmutter, this volume). However, systematic errors are likely to be a significant component of the error budget in the early stages of this program.