![]() | Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1991. 29:
499-541 Copyright © 1991 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved |
5.3 The Luminosity Function and Field Galaxy Evolution
The galaxy luminosity function at optical wavelengths, (M), is an
essential tool in the interpretation of large-scale structure data bases
and galaxy number counts, in the derivation of the universe's mean
properties such as its luminosity density, and in constraining models of
galaxy formation.
Binggeli et al (1988)
recently reviewed the subject.
The two most recent determinations of
(M) have been obtained by
Efstathiou et al (1988)
and de Lapparent et
al (1989).
The former
analyzed the results of the first CfA, DARS, and KOSS surveys, while the
latter concentrated on the results of two 6° x 135° slices.
Schechter-type fits of the form
(L) dL =
* (L /
L*)
exp (-L / L*) d (L / L*),
where L is the luminosity (so L and L*
are related to magnitudes M and
M* in the usual form), yield relatively consistent
results; the shape of
(M) appears relatively well
defined, with MB*
-19.2 ± 0.1 and
-1.1 ± 0.1 for h = 1. The errors in the CGCG
magnitudes, which form the
basic photometric system for the CfA as well as for most northern
samples, are a serious concern. The magnitudes contained in the first
volume of the CGCG (which partly covers the region in the
de Lapparent et al
(1989)
work] are particularly erratic. An additional source of
concern in these determinations is of course related to the issue of
fair sampling. The amplitude of
(M) is particularly affected by these
uncertainties: Efstathiou et al. obtain a value of
* = 0.00156 ± 0.00034
h3 Mpc-3, while the value given by de
Lapparent et al is
* =
0.0020 ± 0.0005 h3 Mpc-3. The mean
luminosity density associated with a
functional description of
(L) as given above is
L =
*
(
+ 2) L*,
where
is the incomplete gamma
function. The main uncertainty on
L
derives from that on
*,
and its value is
L = 1.5 ± 0.4 x 108
hL
Mpc-3,
adopting the luminosity function parameters of de Lapparent et al. With
this determination, a universe with critical mass would have a
mass-to-light ratio of 1800 ± 500 h M
/ L
, a value significantly larger
than the best-determined values for clusters of galaxies (typically <
500 h M
/L
).
The issue of the local density dependence of (M) has been extensively
debated. It has been proved convincingly
(Binggeli et al 1988
and refs.
therein) in Local Supercluster samples - where morphological types are
most reliable - that different morphological types have different
(M)s,
so that
(M) =
t
t (M) ft,
where f
(M) may depend explicitly on
local density
(Giovanelli 1990,
Haynes & Giovanelli
1988),
although disentangling the morphology-density and the luminosity-density
dependences from each other is an uncertain, uneasy task. Related to
this issue is the topic of the evolution of
(M). It has been known for some time
(Kron 1982)
that the number-magnitude relation N(m) gets
steeper than expected with z. It is not known whether this steepening is
caused by a largely enhanced star formation rate in galaxies at z > 0.1
or by a population of faint, local dwarfs.
Broadhurst et al
(1988) have
suggested that, out to z ~ 0.5, little evolution of the bright end of
(M) has occurred, but the
faint-end slope of
(M)
could get steeper
with redshift. The count excess would then result from a
luminosity-dependent luminosity evolution.
Ellis (1990) and
Koo (1990)
recently reviewed the status of this issue, contributing further cause
for skepticism in believing that the bulk of faint galaxies result from
nearby, extremely low luminosity dwarfs. Koo also proposes that unless
very significant merging of galaxies occurred at high redshift (enough
to over-come the volume factor at high z; i.e. if
= 1, the volume
increases much more slowly with z than if
= 0), observations of high
redshift galaxies favor a low
universe.