The comoving distance between two events at the same redshift or
distance but separated on the sky by some angle is
DM
and the transverse comoving
distance DM
(so-denoted for a reason explained below) is simply related to the
line-of-sight comoving distance DC:
where the trigonometric functions sinh and sin account for what
is called ``the curvature of space.'' (Space curvature depends on the
particular coordinate system chosen, so it is not intrinsic; a change
of coordinates makes space flat; the only intrinsic curvature is
space-time curvature, which is related to the local mass-energy
density or really stress-energy tensor.) For = 0,
there is an analytic solution to the equations
(Weinberg 1972, p. 485; Peebles 1993, pp. 320-321). Some (eg., Weedman 1986, pp. 59-60) call this distance measure ``proper distance,'' which, though common usage, is bad style. (1)
(Although these notes follow the Peebles derivation, there is a
qualitatively distinct method using what is known as the
development angle , which
increases as the Universe evolves.
This method is preferred by relativists such as Misner, Thorne &
Wheeler 1973, pp. 782-785).
The comoving distance happens to be equivalent to the proper
motion distance (hence the name DM), defined as
the ratio of the
actual transverse velocity (in distance over time) of an object to its
proper motion (in radians per unit time)
(Weinberg 1972,
pp. 423-424). The proper motion distance is plotted in
Figure 1. Proper motion distance is used, for example,
in computing radio jet velocities from knot motion.