Next Contents Previous

4. WHAT WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT DARK MATTER

The nature of dark matter is the critical unresolved issue in cosmology. On the scale of individual galaxies, the evidence for dark matter is incontrovertible (for a review, see Ashman 1992). From kinematic studies on cosmological scale, two conclusions emerge, as illustrated by Figure 3. Clusters show dark matter in excess of the plausible upper bound from nucleosynthesis, indicating that most of the dark matter is nonbaryonic (Bahcall, Lubin, & Dorman 1995). Structure formation theories would require this dark matter to be non-relativistic at the epoch of recombination, or ``cold.'' This in turns implies a particle physics solution to a cosmology problem, with no experimental data to guide us at this time. Second, cluster evolution and mass-to-light ratios point to a value of Omega0 well below one (setting aside for a moment the ambiguous results from large scale bulk flows). If this is true, then the spatially flat universe that is a natural consequence of the inflationary big bang model can only be recovered with the addition of a non-zero cosmological constant. Unfortunately, we have no theoretical expectation for why Lambda should have a cosmologically interesting value. Few people are willing to contemplate a deeper level of ignorance concerning our theory of gravity, yet there are puzzling problems in the dynamics of galaxies that deserve continued attention (Milgrom 1989; McGaugh & de Blok 1998).

Figure
 3
Figure 3. The density of matter on different scales. The dot-dashed line indicates the integral over luminous matter in galaxies and the striped region shows the baryon bounds from big bang nucleosynthesis.

Next Contents Previous