A useful starting point is the cosmic baryon budget drawn up by Fukugita, Hogan & Peebles (1998), hereinafter FHP, shown in the accompanying table. The total from Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBNS) adopted here agrees quite well with the amount of intergalactic gas at a red-shift of 2 to 3 deduced from the Lyman forest, but exceeds the present-day stellar (plus cold gas) density by an order of magnitude. (1)
All baryons from BBNS | |
(D/H = 3 × 10-5 a) | 0.04 h70-2 |
Stars in spheroids | 0.0026 h70-1 b |
Stars in disks | 0.0009 h70-1 b |
Total stars | 0.0035 h70-1 b |
Cluster hot gas | 0.0026 h70-1.5 b |
Group/field hot gas | 0.014 h70-1.5 b (0.004h75-1 in O VI systems c) |
Total stars + gas | 0.021 h70-1.5 b |
Machos + LSB gals | ?? b |
![]() | 7 × 10-5 h70-1 |
![]() | 1.0 × 10-4 h70-1.5 b |
1.2 × 10-4 h70-1.3 e | |
Yield
![]() ![]() | 0.051 h70-0.3
(![]() ![]() |
Damped Ly-![]() | 0.0015 h70-1 b, f |
Ly-![]() | 0.04 h70-2 b, g |
Gals + DM halos | |
(M/L = 210 h70) | 0.25 b, h |
All matter | |
(fB = .056 h-1.5) | 0.37 h70-0.5 b, i |
a O'Meara et al 200l; but see also Pettini & Bowen 2001; b Fukugita, Hogan & Peebles 1998; c Tripp, Savage & Jenkins 2000; d Edmunds & Phillipps 1997; e Mushotzky & Loewenstein 1997; f Storrie-Lombardi, Irwin & MacMahon 1996; g Rauch, Miralda-Escudé, Sargent et al 1998; h Bahcall, Lubin & Dorman 1995; i White & Fabian 1995. |
FHP pointed out that a dominant and uncertain contribution to the
baryon budget comes from intergalactic ionized gas, not readily
detectable because of its high temperature and low density. The number
which I quote is based on the assumption that the spheroid
star-to-gravitational mass ratio and baryon fraction are the same in
clusters and the field, an assumption that had also been used previously by
Mushotzky & Loewenstein
(1997).
The resulting total star-plus-gas density
is within spitting distance of
B from BBNS, but
leaves a
significant-looking shortfall which may be made up by some combination
of MACHOs and low surface-brightness galaxies; it is not clear that a
significant contribution from the latter has been ruled out (cf
O'Neil 2000).
1 The stellar density taken here from
FHP is based on B-luminosity density estimates and might be revised
upwards by 50 per cent in light of SDSS commissioning data
(Blanton et al 2000)
or downwards by 20 per cent in light of 2dF red-shifts plus
2MASS K-magnitudes
(Cole et al 2000);
in either case we are following FHP in assuming the IMF by
Gould, Bahcall & Flynn
(1996),
which has 0.7 times the
M / LV ratio for old stellar populations
compared to a Salpeter function with lower cutoff at
0.15 M.
Back.