Next Contents Previous

2. THE SAMPLE

Our sample consists of 64 spiral galaxies with a distribution of HII regions not too irregular and with an inclination angle of less than 80° for which catalogues with more than 50 HII region positions are available in the literature. They are listed in Table 1. Column 1 gives the galaxy name, Column 2 the number of HII regions in the published catalogue and Column 3 gives a number referencing to the source of the catalogue. For 8 galaxies two catalogues were available and for 2 galaxies three. Columns 4 and 5 give the type of the galaxy according to the Second Reference Catalogue (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1976, hereafter RC2) and to the Shapley-Ames catalogue (Sandage & Tamman 1981, hereafter SA).

Table 1.

Galaxy Number of Reference RC2 Type Shapley Spiral Arm Flux
Name HII region Number Ames type structure type information

N 157 84 3 4 Sc(s)I-II R 12
N 224 688 4 3 SbI-II Y - Y
N 224 960 5 3 SbI-II Y - Y
N 300 176 6 7 ScII.8 R 5 Y
N 470 51 3 3 Sbc(s)II.8 N 3
N 598 101 7 6 Sc(s)II-III Y 5 Y
N 598 779 8 6 Sc(s)II-III Y 5 Y
N 598 748 9 6 Sc(s)II-III Y 5 Y
N 628 193 1 5 Sc(s)I Y 9
N 628 730 10 5 Sc(s)I Y 9 Y
N 772 62 3 3 Sb(rs)I N 4
N 925 99 1 7 SBc(s)II-III Y 1
N 925 132 3 7 SBc(s)II-III Y 1
N 1073 74 3 5 SBc(rs)II N 5
N 1084 46 3 5 Sc(s)II.2 N 5
N 1232 130 1 5 Sc(rs)I Y 9
N 1232 529 3 5 Sc(rs)I Y 9
N 1313 375 23 7 SBc(s)III-IV Y 5 Y
N 1566 267 11 4 Sbc(s)I.2 Y 12 Y
N 1566 476 12 4 Sbc(s)I.2 Y 12 Y
N 1832 57 3 4 SBb(r)I N 5
N 2276 72 3 5 Sc(r)II-III N 2
N 2403 109 1 6 Sc(s)III N 4
N 2403 52 14 6 Sc(s)III N 4 Y
N 2403 605 3 6 Sc(s)III N 4
N 2805 118 3 7 - R 5
N 2835 124 3 5 SBc(rs)I.2 Y 9
N 2841 61 3 3 Sb N -
N 2903 74 2 4 Sc(s)I-II N 7
N 2903 75 14 4 Sc(s)I-II N 7 Y
N 2976 74 3 5 SdIII-IV N 3
N 2997 382 15 5 Sc(s)I.3 R 9 Y
N 3031 801 3 2 Sb(r)I-II Y 12
N 3031 492 16 2 Sb(r)I-II Y 12 Y
N 3184 56 1 6 Sc(r)II.2 R 9
N 3184 144 3 6 Sc(r)II.2 R 9
N 3310 86 3 4 Sbc(r)tide N 1
N 3344 151 3 4 Sbc(rs)I.2 R 9
N 3351 102 2 3 SBb(r)II N 6
N 3351 112 3 3 SBb(r)II N 6
N 3486 81 1 5 Sbc(r)I.2 R 9
N 3486 153 3 5 Sbc(r)I.2 R 9
N 3521 149 3 4 Sbc(s)II R 3
N 3627 62 2 3 Sb(s)II.2 Y 7
N 3631 222 13 5 Sbc(s)II Y 9 Y
N 3938 160 3 5 Sc(s)I R 9
N 3992 394 25 4 SBb(rs)I Y 9 Y
N 4254 10 2 5 Sc(s)I.3 Y 9
N 4254 214 3 5 Sc(s)I.3 Y 9
N 4298 87 3 5 Sc(s)III N 2
N 4303 131 2 4 Sc(s)I.2 Y 9
N 4303 289 3 4 Sc(s)I.2 Y 9
N 4321 56 2 4 Sc(s)I R 12
N 4321 289 3 4 Sc(s)I R 12
N 4321 437 20 4 Sc(s)I R 12 Y
N 4535 221 3 5 SBc(s)I.3 Y 9
N 4559 78 3 6 Sc(s)II N -
N 4568 65 3 4 Sc(s)II-III R -
N 4654 107 3 6 SBc(rs)II N 4
N 4689 68 3 4 Sc(s)II.3 N 3
N 4736 54 3 2 RSab(s) N 3
N 4939 107 3 4 Sbc(rs)I R 12
N 5055 138 3 4 Sbc(s)II-III R 3
N 5128 107 3 -2 SO+S pec R -
N 5194 109 17 4 Sbc(s)I-II Y 12
N 5194 88 3 4 Sbc(s)I-II Y 12
N 5236 60 24 5 SBc(s)II Y 9 Y
N 5236 296 18 5 SBc(s)II Y 9 Y
N 5248 97 3 4 Sc(s)I-II R 12
N 5457 190 1 6 Sc(r)I Y 9
N 5457 471 3 6 Sc(r)I Y 9
N 5678 58 3 8 Sc(s)II-III N 1
N 5921 85 2 4 SBbc(s)I-II R 8
N 5962 112 3 5 Sc(rs)II.3 N 2
N 6015 105 2 6 Sc(s)II-III N -
N 6384 142 3 4 Sb(r)II.2 R 9
N 6503 101 2 6 Sc(s)II.8 N -
N 6503 125 19 6 Sc(s)II.8 N -
N 6643 93 2 5 Sc(s)II R 5
N 6946 40 1 6 Sc(s)II Y 9
N 6946 540 3 6 Sc(s)II Y 9
N 6946 643 21 6 Sc(s)II Y 9 Y
N 7331 124 3 4 Sb(rs)I-II R -
N 7479 66 3 5 SBbc(s)I-II R 9
N 7741 85 3 6 SBc(s)II.2 Y 5
N 7793 35 1 8 Sd(s)IV N 2
N 7793 132 22 8 Sd(s)IV N 2 Y
I 342 666 3 6 - N -
I 5325 93 3 4 Sc(s)II-III N -

  1. Hodge, P.W.: (1969a)
  2. Hodge, P.W.: (1974)
  3. Hodge, P.W., Kennicutt, R.C.: (1983)
  4. Baade, W., Arp, H.: (1964)
  5. Pellet et al.: (1978)
  6. Deharveng et al.: (1988)
  7. Courtés, G., Cruvellier, P.: (1963)
  8. Sabbadin et al.: (1980)
  9. Courtés et al.: (1987)
  10. Hodge, P.W.: (1976)
  11. Sersic, J.L., Calderon, J.M.:
  12. Comte, G., Duquennoy, A.: (1982)
  1. Boeshaar, G.O., Hodge, P.W.: (1977)
  2. Véron, P., Sauvayre, A.: (1963)
  3. Milliard, B., Marcelin, M.: (1981)
  4. Petit et al. : (1988)
  5. Carranza et al.: (1969)
  6. Rumstay, K.S., Kaufman, M.: (1983)
  7. de Vaucouleurs, G., Caulet, A.: (1982)
  8. Cepa, J., Beckman, J.E: (1990)
  9. Bonnarel et al.: (1986)
  10. Davoust, E., de Vaucouleurs, G.: (1980)
  11. Marcelin, M., Gondoin, Ph.: (1983)
  12. de Vaucouleurs et al.: (1983)
  13. Cepa, J., Beckman, J.E.: (1989)

Depending on whether the HII regions outline what could be called a grand design spiral, or not, we have classified the galaxies in our samples as Y or N. Intermediate cases, i.e. when the galaxy has some trace of spirality but of short extent or badly defined, are labelled R in Column 6. The arm type classification of Elmegreen & Elmegreen (1987) is given in Column 7, while Column 8 mentions whether there is flux information in the catalogue.

It is obvious that a better analysis can be made of galaxies for which the catalogue contains many HII regions, yet some information can be obtained with as low as 50 HII regions. We have thus grouped galaxies according to the number of HII regions in their catalogue in Table 2. This shows that a complete study, including the analysis of the spiral structure whenever existent, can be made for the 19 galaxies with more than 200 HII regions, while a reasonable one for the 21 galaxies with 100 leq N leq 200.

Table 2.

NUMBER OF HII REGIONS DETECTED NUMBER OF GALAXIES

50 < N leq 100 24
100 < N leq 150 17
150 < N leq 200 4
200 < N leq 250 3
250 < N leq 300 3
300 < N leq 400 3
400 < N leq 500 2
500 < N 8

Figure 1 shows a histogram of the number of galaxies of a given type, as classified in the RC2. We note that more than half of our sample are of type bc or c. This is due on the one hand to the lack of HII regions in early-type galaxies and on the other to the preference of observers to "pretty" galaxies and to the relative scarcity of large angular diameter in very late-type galaxies.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Histogram of the number of galaxies as a function of type according to the second reference catalogue. The number of galaxies is given also on top of each bin.

Our galaxies were classified as Y, N or R based on their HII region distribution, not the galaxy image as for the classification of Elmegreen & Elmegreen (1987). It is thus of interest to compare the two classifications. For this we plot in Figure 2 histograms of the number of galaxies of a given Elmegreen & Elmegreen arm class. We have done this for all our sample (a), the Y ones (b), the R ones (c) and the N ones (d) separately. We note that the correspondence is very good. There are no galaxies with arm classes higher than 7 in our N subsample, while most galaxies in our Y subsample have arm class larger or equal to 5. (1) One galaxy, NGC 925, is in our Y subsample, while being classified as chaotic by Elmegreen & Elmegreen. However the difference is not between the blue light and the HII region distribution, but rather between the classifiers, since we would say that this galaxy has a structure.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Histogram of the number of galaxies as a function of arm class according to Elmegreen & Elmegreen (1987). a) All galaxies in our sample, b) galaxies with clear structure in their HII region distribution, c) intermediate cases, d) galaxies with no structure in their HII region distribution.



1 Class 5 according to Elmegreen & Elmegreen (1987) corresponds to galaxies with two symmetric, short arms in the inner regions and with irregular outer arms and class 6 to galaxies with two symmetric inner arms and feathery ringlike outer structure. Back.

Next Contents Previous