![]() | Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1980. 18:
165-218 Copyright © 1980 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved |
3.2. Polarization Distributions
In the absence of a thermal plasma, synchrotron radiation is polarized
orthogonally to the magnetic field direction by a percentage
100[(3 - 3) /
(5 - 3
)]
[(Bu2 /
(Bu2 + Br2)] where
is the spectral index
(S
),
and Bu and Br are the respective
field strengths of the uniform and random components of the magnetic field
(Gardner & Whiteoak
1966,
Moffet 1975).
Hence simple inspection of the polarization
distributions should apparently give information about the direction
and turbulence of the magnetic field in a source. However, at all but
the shortest wavelengths the interpretation of polarization
distributions is made both more complicated and more informative by
Faraday rotation. In a magnetoionic medium the plane of polarization
of linearly polarized radiation is rotated through an angle
proportional to the square of the wavelength:
= 5.73 × 10-3
R
2 deg,
where R = 812
nt(s)B||(s) ds
~ 8.1 × 108 ntB||
s rad m-2 is the "rotation
measure",
(cm) is the
wavelength, s (kpc) is the path length through the medium,
nt(s) (cm-3) is the density of thermal
electrons, and B||(s)
is the component of magnetic field parallel to the path, i.e. in the
line of sight.
Integrated rotation measures have been published for several hundred
sources
(Vallée & Kronberg
1975,
Haves 1975).
Although a small
proportion of sources such as 3C123 and 3C427.1 have intrinsic
rotation measures that probably exceed several hundred rad m-2
(Kronberg & Strom
1977,
Riley & Pooley 1978),
more than three quarters
have absolute values smaller than 50 rad m-2. Hence, the
directions indicated by the measured polarization distributions for
6
cm will usually be within 10° of the unrotated angles
(i.e. perpendicular to
the uniform magnetic field projected on the plane of the sky). Maps of
projected magnetic field directions
B
are
therefore relatively
easy to produce from polarization distributions measured at short
wavelengths.
In principle, a comparison of polarization distributions at several wavelengths gives the distribution of R across a source and hence information about variations in ntB||. Unfortunately, matters are complicated by (a) ambiguities in R due to the limited number of observing frequencies, (b) difficulties in separating the in-source contribution to R from foreground rotation, (c) uncertainties in the path length s through the source, (d) effects of nonuniformity of the magnetic field within the source, including field reversals, (e) smearing due to the presence of several independent "cells" within the same observing beam.
Until now most multifrequency polarization mapping has been carried
out using two (or, in a few special cases, three) observing wavelengths
1,
2. There is
consequently an ambiguity
of n
in chi and a
corresponding ambiguity in R of 3.14 × 104 /
(
22
-
12)
rad m-2.
Separation of the rotation that occurs within the source from that in the foreground has been attempted in two ways. First, the foreground rotation is obtained as the average of integrated rotation measures of several nearby sources. Second, one ignores the component of rotation that is constant across the source and examines only point-to-point variations in R, on the assumption that all these relatively small-scale changes in R are produced within the source.
One can guess at the path length s using symmetry arguments and assumptions about the distance, as in the preceding discussion of the derivation of the minimum-energy conditions.
A proper treatment of the effects of a tangled magnetic field and of
beam smearing must take into account the distribution of the
percentage polarization as a function of wavelength. The complex
polarization as a function of wavelength can be evaluated in terms of
source parameters
(Burn 1966,
Gardner & Whiteoak
1966).
To obtain
meaningful information from available data, an unduly large number of
assumptions must be made about the statistical properties of the
inhomogeneities and the source geometry. Such analyses have been
carried out for 3C465
(van Breugel 1980c)
and Virgo A
(Forster 1980).
A slightly different
(Monte Carlo)
model fitting procedure has been used by
Burch (1979b)
in a study of 3C47, 3C79, 3C219, 3C234,
3C300, 3C382, and 3C430. The results (electron densities of from
10-5 to 10-3 cm-3 corresponding to
total masses of ~ 1011
M) are all
quite similar to those given by back of the envelope calculation using
the simple formulas in this section. However, the more sophisticated
analyses illustrate that multifrequency polarization comparisons made,
using many more frequencies than now available, could furnish useful
information about the intrinsic distribution of nt and
B along the line of sight.