3.3. Reddening correction
The usual dereddening procedure is to derive the logarithmic extinction at
H, C,
from the observed
H
/
H
ratio,
assuming that the intrinsic one has the value
(H
/
H
)B
predicted by case B recombination:
![]() |
(3.33) |
where
f and
f
represent the values of the reddening
law at the wavelengths of the
H
and
H
lines
respectively.
Then, for any observed line ratio
(F1
/ F
2)obs
one can obtain the reddening corrected value
(F
1 /
F
2)corr from:
![]() |
(3.34) |
Ideally, one can iterate after having determined the electron
temperature of the plasma, to use a value of
(H /
H
)B
at the appropriate temperature.
There are nevertheless several problems. One is that the
extinction law is not universal. As shown by
Cardelli et al. (1989),
it depends on the parameter RV = AV
/ E(B - V),
where AV is the absolute extinction in V and
E(B - V) is the
color excess. While the canonical value of RV is 3 -
3.2, the actual values range from 2.5 to 5
(Cardelli et al. 1989,
Barbaro et al. 2001,
Patriarchi et
al. 2001).
Objects located in the Galactic
bulge suffer from an extinction characterized by a low value of
RV (e.g.
Stasinska et al. 1992,
Liu et al. 2001).
Cardelli et. el. (1989)
attribute these differences in extinction laws
between small and large values of RV to the presence of
systematically larger particles in dense regions. These
variations in RV have a significant effect on line
ratios when dealing with ultraviolet spectra. It is therefore convenient to
link the optical and ultraviolet spectra by using line ratios
with known intrinsic value, such as He II
1640 /
He II
4686.
Another difficulty is that dust is not necessarily entirely located between the object and the observer as in the case of stars. Some extinction may be due to dust mixed with the emitting gas. In that case, the wavelength dependence of the extinction is different and strongly geometry dependent (Mathis 1983). One way to proceed, which alleviates this problem, is to use the entire set of observed hydrogen lines and fit their ratios to the theoretical value, which then gives an empirical reddening law to deredden the other emission lines. This, however, is still not perfect, since the extinction suffered by lines emitted only at the periphery of the nebula, or, on the contrary, only in the central parts, is different from the extinction suffered by hydrogen lines which are emitted in the entire nebular body. The problem is further complicated by scattering effects (see e. g. Henney 1998).
In the case of giant H II regions, where the observing slit encompasses stellar light, one must first correct for the stellar absorption in the hydrogen lines. This can be done in an iterative procedure, as outlined for example by Izotov et al. (1994).
A further problem is that the intrinsic hydrogen line ratios may deviate
from case B theory. This occurs for example in nebulae with high
electron temperature (~ 20000 K), where collisional
contribution to the emissivity of the lowest order Balmer lines may
become significant. In that case, a line ratio corrected assuming case
B for the hydrogen lines,
(F1
/ F
2)B is related to the true line ratio
(F
1
/ F
2)true by:
![]() |
(3.35) |
The error is independent of the real extinction and can be
large for 1 very
different from
2. For example,
it can easily reach a factor 1.5 - 2 for C III]
1909 /
[O III]
5007 (see
Stasinska 2002).
Whatever dereddening procedure is adopted, it is good practise to check
whether the H
/ H
value has
the expected value. If not, the [O III]
4363/5007 ratio will
be in error by a similar amount.