1.2. Polarimetry
The large majority of recent observations of medium-scale and large-scale magnetic fields were in radio astronomy (e.g., cm, mm, submm/extreme-infrared wavelengths), with some additional observations from optical astronomy (e.g., µm wavelengths).
The methods employed to study the magnetic fields in Milky Way objects are similar to the ones used to study the magnetic fields in other galaxies. The methods of Faraday rotation, synchrotron equipartition, and cosmic-ray collisions as discussed at length in Section 4.1, while the methods of dust grain emission and absorption and of Zeeman splitting are discussed more fully in Section 2.1. The two main methods largely used (Faraday rotation, grain emission) are briefly outlined below.
Rotatable polarimeters give the position angle of the electric vector at maximum intensity for the incoming radiation, as well as the percentage of the incoming radiation that is linearly polarized. Observing wise, for detecting a source that is 4% linearly polarized, one requires more time by a factor 1 / (0.04)2 = 625 at the telescope for detecting the polarized signal than for detecting the total continuum emission.
One important physical phenomenon used to measure medium-scale magnetic fields is thermal dust emission. Thermal dust emission processes from dust particles aligned by the magnetic fields in interstellar clouds show linearly polarized continuum emission in the extreme infrared (mm and submm wavelengths) and far infrared (e.g., 100 µm), allowing the study and the mapping of the magnetic fields in large clouds. In emission, the position angle PA of the electric vector at maximum intensity is perpendicular to the magnetic field lines. To study magnetic fields at moderate thermal density, it is best to use telescope at submm wavelengths, because of the following. At cm and long mm wavelengths, there is often not enough signal from dust in many cases (poor signal to noise ratio). At far infrared wavelengths, there are costly airborne flights necessary. At near infrared and optical wavelengths one has to cope with several physical problems: (i) multiple scatterings that induce polarization, independent of magnetic fields, (ii) the need to find bright background sources behind clouds, (iii) the ambiguity between one magnetic field direction and its opposite, and (iv) there is no secure method to get the magnetic field strength. Scarrott (1996) reviews the limited data obtained by optical observations, while Scarrott et al. (1996) argue for a mixture of two mechanisms to explain optical polarization data in the galaxy NGC 5128.
One important physical phenomenon used to deduce the large-scale
galactic magnetic field is the Faraday rotation effect. Large scale
magnetic fields in spiral galaxies
are studied primarily through Faraday rotation of nearby pulsars
and of distant galaxies
and quasars. Due to the well known Faraday rotation observable at
centimeter wavelengths,
the change of the position angle PA of the electric vector at
maximum intensity
PA with
wavelength
, follows
the Faraday formula:
PA = (RM)
.
2 ,
where
PA is in
radians,
is in m, and RM is the rotation measure (rad./m2). One has: RM
=
0.8ne
. BI . dL
where ne is the free electron density
(cm-3), BI
is the magnetic field (µgauss) component
parallel to the line of sight, and L is the length (pc) along the
line of sight. The RM is the
linear sum of the individual contributions from the radio emitter
(a galaxy or a
quasar, say), from the intracluster medium around the source, the
intergalactic medium
between clusters of galaxies (quite negligible), and from the
interstellar medium in our
Galaxy (in spiral arms and in large interstellar bubbles). A
catalogue of unambiguous
rotation measure for 674 galaxies and quasars was published by
Broten et al. (1988).
It contains sources whose data had been selected in one physical
wavelength range only, to
cover a single physical régime, that of a Faraday-thin, one-component,
spectrum-limited source.
Galactic magnetic fields can be split into a random
component Bran and a uniform (ie regular) component
Breg, and these components can be added in
the usual quadratic way:
Btot2 = Breg2
+ Bran2. The random
component is on average twice as strong as the uniform component
(Breg
0.5Bran, e.g., Table 2
in Vallée 1984a).
In the Milky Way, the
uniform component was found to be oriented nearly azimuthally, i.e.,
locally towards galactic longitude
l
90°
(e.g., equation 5 in
Vallée 1983a).
Important subtleties involved in deducing polarization and in interpreting them, to alert the theoretical reader to the pitfalls in interpreting the data, can be found in Sections 3 and 4 here, as well as elsewhere (e.g., Vallée 1980; Heiles 1987; Kronberg 1994; Vallée 1995a; Vallée 1996a; Vallée 1996b).
The aim of the present review is to highlight the salient discoveries, on the subject of magnetic fields on mid scales and large scales. Section 2 deals with medium and large objects within our Milky Way, while Section 3 deals with the Milky Way as a whole. Sections 4 and 5 study the nearby galaxies and the more distant objects.