On a cosmological scale, the formation and evolution of dust in galaxies
and damped Ly (DLA)
systems has been a subject of considerable interest with the goals of
studying the following: the effects of dust on the rate of various
dust-related physical processes in their ISM such as the formation of
H2
[31];
the obscuration of quasars
[24,
8];
the relation between the dust abundance and galaxy metallicity
[47,
19];
the depletion of elements in DLA systems
[38,
39];
and the evolution of the IR emission seen in the diffuse extragalactic
background light
[57].
Also a subject of great interest is when galaxies became first opaque,
opacity being defined in a bolometric sense as the fraction of total
starlight energy that is processed by dust into IR
emission. Observations of ultraluminous IR galaxies at redshifts of ~ 3
[23,
34]
and the detection of large quantities of dust in high-redshift objects
[14],
suggest that dust formation occurred early and efficiently after the
onset of galaxy formation. The need for rapid dust formation has led
Dunne et al.
[14]
to propose that massive, rapidly evolving stars must be responsible for
the dust observed at high redshifts. This seems to be supported by the
fact that dust production in AGB stars is delayed by a few hundred
million years, compared to the production by SNe (see
Figure 7). Furthermore, the yield of
dust in AGB stars may be quite lower than
that depicted in Figure 2. But what is
the dust yield from SNe? Observations of Cas A with the ISO
[45,
3]
and Spitzer satellites
[30,
43]
show that the total mass of SN condensed dust is less than ~ 0.2
M, which is
only about 10%, of the total amount of refractory elements that formed
in the ejecta. Using SCUBA submillimeter observations of the remnant,
Dunne et al.
[14]
claimed to have detected a large mass (M
2 - 20
M
, depending on
the adopted dust properties) of cold dust in the ejecta of Cas A. This
large amount of dust exceeds the amount of refractory elements produced
in the explosion
[22].
Subsequent observations with the Spitzer satellite, and
comparison of the SCUBA data with molecular line observations revealed
that the submillimeter emission from the direction of Cas A is actually
emitted from a molecular cloud along the line of sight to the remnant,
instead of the ejecta
[43,
65].
The total mass of dust produced in SNe may therefore also be lower by a
factor between 5 and 10 from those depicted in
Figure 3. The question of
what dust is responsible for the rise in galactic opacity will depend
therefore on details of the dust evolution model. On one hand, SNe do
indeed form the first dust, but on the other hand, carbon particles are
significantly more opaque than silicates, potentially offsetting the
advantage of SN condensates. What dust particles are ultimately
responsible for producing the UV-optical opacity in galaxies will
therefore depend on the relative yields of SN- and AGB-condensed dust,
and their subsequent evolution. Here we will only present a very
preliminary investigation into this issue.
We will assume that galaxies first become opaque when the radial visual optical depth of molecular clouds in which most of the star formation takes place exceeds unity. The radial opacity of a cloud at V is given by:
![]() |
(1) |
where Zd is the dust-to-gas mass ratio,
Mc the mass of the cloud, Rc its
radius, and d
is the mass absorption coefficient of the dust. The criteria we adopt
here is obviously a simplified one, since many overlapping optically
thin molecular clouds can create an effectively opaque line-of-sight to
star forming regions. Nevertheless, this criterion is useful for this
simple analysis. Numerically, the expression for
(V) is approximately
given by:
![]() |
(2) |
Dust opacities at V are [11]:
![]() |
(3) (4) |
The surface density of molecular clouds in normal galaxies exhibits a
narrow spread in values, ranging from about 10 to 100
M
pc-2
[33].
In luminous IR galaxies (LIRGs) star formation seems to take place in
clouds with higher surface densities of about 103 to
104
M
pc-2
[58].
Adopting a cloud surface density of 5 × 103
M
pc-2 we get that actively star forming galaxies will become
first opaque when
(V)
1, or when
![]() |
(5) |
From Figure 7 we get that the
critical metallicity for carbon dust is
reached when the time lapse since the onset of star formation,
t, is about
100 Myr, and that SN-condensed carbon dominates the abundance of carbon
dust in the ISM. If only AGB stars produced carbon dust, then silicate
dust particles will provide the first significant opacity and reach the
critical metallicity at
t
400 Myr. Carbon
produced in AGB stars will reach the critical carbon metallicity later,
at
t
500 Myr. Adopting a
standard
CDM
cosmology with a Hubble constant of 70 km s-1 Mpc-1,
=
0.73, and
m = 0.27,
we get that the rate at which the universe ages as a function of
redshift z is given, to an accuracy of ~ 4%, by:
![]() |
(6) |
If the SSP first formed at z = zs, the the
universe became first opaque at a redshift
z=1 given by:
![]() |
(7) |
Figure 10 shows the exact relation between
zs and
z=1 for different values of
t. For the
simple model adopted here, the figure shows that a galaxy formed at
redshift zs = 10, will become opaque at
z
=1
8.8 if
t = 100 Myr,
and at z
=1
5.9 if
t = 500
Myr. The actual value of
t depends on
the chemical evolution model, the condensation efficiencies of carbon
and silicate dust in the different sources, and the star formation
history of the galaxy.
The figure presented here is very general, and illustrates the
interrelation between the epoch of galaxy formation and the evolution of
dust. It is applied here to a simplified model which was not
specifically designed to follow the evolution of the ultraluminous IR
galaxies (ULIRGs) observed at high redshifts. ULIRGs may have a much
higher star formation rate than value of 80
M
yr-1 used in the calculations. Furthermore, as mentioned
before, the overlap of molecular clouds can render a galaxy opaque even
when the individual clouds are optically thin. The model above was only
presented here for illustrative purposes, and can easily be used to
solve the inverse problem: given the fact that a galaxy is observed to
be optically thick at a given redshift, what are the required star
formation rate and dust formation efficiencies to make it optically
thick at that redshift?