Contents Previous

REFERENCES

  1. I'm going to use the American English spelling of this word, since to many non-British people, “sceptic” looks too much like “septic”.

  2. Planck Collaboration I, A&A, 594 (2016) A1.

  3. Planck Collaboration XIII, A&A, 594(2016) A13.

  4. Fixsen D. J., ApJ, 707 (2009) 916.

  5. Fixsen D. J., Cheng E. S., Gales J. M., Mather J. C., Shafer R. A. Wright E. L., ApJ, 473 (1996) 576.

  6. Zibin J. P. Scott D., PRD, 78 (2008) 123529.

  7. Planck Collaboration XVI, A&A, 571 (2014) A16.

  8. Scott D., Narimani A. Page D. N., Physics in Canada, 70 (2013) 258.

  9. Scott D. Smoot G., Chinese Phys. C, 40 (2016) 100001.

  10. Scott D., Contreras D., Narimani A. Ma Y.-Z., JCAP, 6 (2016) 046.

  11. Ma Y.-Z. Scott D., PRD, 93 (2016) 083510.

  12. Scott D., Canadian J. Phys. 84 (2006) 419.

  13. Lawrence C. R., Scott D. White M., PASP, 111 (1999) 525.

  14. Scott D. White M., The Existence of Baryons at z = 1000, in proc. of CMB Anisotropies Two Years after COBE: Observations, Theory and the Future, edited by Krauss L. M. 1994, p. 214.

  15. Pierpaoli E., Scott D. White M., Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 15 (2000) 1357.

  16. Ostriker J. P. Steinhardt P. J., Nat., 377 (1995) 600, astro-ph/9505066.

  17. Krauss L. Turner M. S., Gen. Rel. Grav. 27 (1995) 1137, astro-ph/9504003.

  18. White M., Scott D., Silk J. Davis M., MNRAS, 276 (1995) L69.

  19. White M., Viana P. T. P., Liddle A. R. Scott D., MNRAS, 283 (1996) 107.

  20. Efstathiou G., Sutherland W. J. Maddox S. J., Nat., 348 (1990) 705.

  21. I'm reminded of the skeptics' joke that when “alternative medicine” works it's just called “medicine”. In the same way, if a “tension” was actually big enough to be significant, then it would be called a “difference”.

  22. Url: https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~dfabricant/huchra/hubble.plot.dat.

  23. Pritychenko B., A nuclear data approach for the Hubble constant measurements, in proc. of Eur. Phys. J. Web of Conf., Vol. 146 of Eur. Phys. J. Web of Conf. 2017, p. 01006.

  24. Riess A. G., Macri L., Casertano S., Lampeitl H., Ferguson H. C., Filippenko A. V., Jha S. W., Li W. Chornock R., ApJ, 730 (2011) 119.

  25. Bennett C. L., ApJS, 208 (2013) 20.

  26. Planck Collaboration Interm. LI, A&A, 607 (2017) A95.

  27. Frolop A. Scott D., ArXiv e-prints2016, 1603.09703.

  28. Contreras D., Hutchinson J., Moss A., Scott D. Zibin J. P., PRD, 97 (2018) 063504.

  29. Contreras D., Zibin J. P., Scott D., Banday A. J. Górski K. M., PRD 96 (2017) 123522.

  30. Bunge M., Skeptical Inquirer, 30 (4) (2006) 29.

  31. Planck Collaboration XXII, A&A, 571 (2014) A22.

  32. Planck Collaboration XX, A&A, 594 (2016) A20.

  33. I've spent a long time trying to determine just what we've learned regarding inflation and hence where we are on the spectrum of proof for this concept, and I've come up with the following statement (which I challenge anyone to disagree with): “something like inflation is something like proven”.

  34. Scott D., White M., Cohn J. D. Pierpaoli E., ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints 2001, astro-ph/0104435.

  35. Scott D., Astronomy and Geophysics, 52 (2011) 6.31, arXiv:1112.0285.

Contents Previous