The observationally successful theory of the origin of the light
elements by nucleosynthesis at redshift z ~ 109 predicts
the mean baryon density in terms of the primeval element
abundances (as reviewed extensively in the literature; for example
Walker et al. 1991,
Copi et al. 1995,
Hata et al. 1997).
We consider here standard homogeneous nucleosynthesis predictions for
abundances as a function of the baryon-to-photon ratio
10-10
10, where the present baryon density
is
baryonh702 = 7.45 x
10-3
10. In this
context the strongest constraints on
baryon derive from
the abundances of helium and deuterium.
The primordial deuterium abundance is still uncertain
but we can quote reliable upper and lower bounds. A conservative
lower bound, (D/H)p 2 x 10-5, comes from many sources -
the Jovian atmosphere (e.g.
Niemann 1996),
the interstellar medium
(Ferlet & Lemoine 1996,
Linsky et al. 1995),
and quasar absorption lines
(Tytler, Fan & Burles 1996),
together with the fact that no source outside the Big Bang is known
to produce deuterium significantly. An upper bound,
(D/H)p
2 x
10-4, comes from several measurements
in metal-poor quasar absorption systems
(Songaila et al. 1994;
Carswell et al. 1994;
Webb et al. 1997;
Songalia, Wampler, &
Cowie, 1997).
Although the identification as deuterium in these systems is disputed
(Tytler, Burles, &
Kirkman 1997),
the lack
of higher detected values, and the fact that significant D destruction
would normally be expected to produce significant metal enrichment,
makes this a robust upper limit.
These yield the limits 1.7
10
7.2. The lower
bound is used for the minimum value of
baryon in
line 14 in Table 3. For comparison we
include the central value favored by
Burles and Tytler (1997),
(D/H)p = 3.4 x 10-5, which yields
10 = 5.1
or
baryon =
0.039h70-2.
The helium abundance Y is well measured in nearby
galaxies (e.g.,
Pagel et al. 1992;
Skillmann et al. 1994;
Izotov, Thuan, &
Lipovetsky 1997).
The primordial value Yp derived from these observations
depends on models of stellar enrichment, but the present datasets yield
a nearly model-independent 2 Bayesian
upper limit Yp
0.243
(Hogan, Olive, & Scully
1997).
This corresponds to
10 = 3.6, which we use for
the maximum value in line 13 in Table 3;
it is about half the upper limit from deuterium. Most current studies (e.g.
Olive & Steigman 1995)
are consistent with the central
value Yp
0.23 used in the table.