![]() | Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1994. 32:
531-590 Copyright © 1994 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved |
7.1. Macrolensing Constraints on Compact Objects
If one has a population of compact objects with mass M and
density parameter
c, then
the probability P of one of them image-doubling a source at
redshift
z
1 and the
separation between the images
are given by
![]() | (7.1) |
(Press & Gunn 1973).
One can therefore use upper limits on the frequency of
macrolensing for different image separations to constrain
c as a
function of
M. Although optical searches, VLA, and the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) can only constrain objects down to 1010
M
(corresponding to a resolution of
0.1 arcsec), speckle cameras (with a resolution of 10-2
arcsec) can get down to 108
M
, while
VLBI and VLBA (with resolutions of 1 and 0.1 milliarcsec) can
search for objects as small as 106
M
and
104
M
. The
best strategy is to look for dim images near bright objects
(Nemiroff & Bistolas 1990),
which requires
a large dynamic range, but one can also look for circular distortions
and gravity rings
(Saslaw et al 1985,
Turner et al 1990).
The usual approach is to derive
the "detection volume," defined as the volume between the source and
observer
within which the lens would need to lie in order to produce an
observable effect
(Nemiroff 1989,
Kassiola et al 1991).
Limits are then obtained by adding the
detection volume for each source and comparing this to the volume per source
expected for a given
C.
There have been several optical and radio surveys to search for
multiply-imaged quasars
(Hewitt et al 1989,
Bahcall et al 1992b).
In particular,
Hewitt (1986)
used VLA observations to infer
C(1011-1013
M
) <
0.4,
Nemiroff (1991b)
used optical QSO data from
Crampton et al (1989)
to infer
C(M
> 109.9
M
) < 1
and
C(M
> 1010.3
M
) <
0.25, and
Surdej et al (1993)
used data on 469 highly luminous quasars (including HST
observations) to
infer
C(1010-1012
M
) <
0.02. To probe smaller scales, one must use high
resolution radio sources:
Kassiola et al (1991)
have used lack of lensing in
40 VLBI objects to infer
C(107-109
M
) <
0.4, while a study by
Patnaik et al (1992)
of 200 flat spectrum radio sources may lead to a limit
C(106-109
M
)
< 0.01
(Henstock et al 1993).
(Flat spectrum sources are dominated
by a single core and are therefore more likely to be lensed: this limit
assumes that no sources are identified and is not included in
Figure 5.)
Future observations could strengthen these constraints considerably: Speckle
interferometry could push
C(108-1010
M
) down
to 0.01, while VLBA could
push
C(105-108
M
) down
to 0.001
(Surdej et al 1993).
These two limits are
shown as broken lines in Figure 5.
Another interesting possibility is to search
for lensing distortions in radio jets
(Kronberg et al 1991):
this would permit the
detection of objects with mass around 106
M
since
the Einstein radius for such
objects is of order milliarcsecs and therefore comparable to the
characteristic jet
scale. Of course, jets may be intrinsically kinky but
Wambsganss & Paczynski
(1992)
have pointed out that this poses no problem if one uses VLBI and VLBA
maps of the jets in image-doubled quasars because only one of the images
would then be kinked. Their numerical simulations show that the effects of
supermassive black holes would be numerous and obvious. Lenses between
0.3 and 3 × 106
M
would
certainly be noticeable for a dynamic range of 100:1
and may have already been excluded
(Heflin et al 1991,
Garrett et al 1994).