![]() | Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1994. 32:
531-590 Copyright © 1994 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved |
7.3. The Effect of Microlensing on Quasar Luminosity
Evidence for the microlensing of unmacrolensed quasars may come from
studying their luminosity variations
(Peacock 1986,
Kayser et al 1986,
Schneider & Weiss 1987,
Refsdal & Starbell 1991,
Lewis et al 1993),
and there may already be cases of this. In particular,
Nottale (1986)
claims that lensing by low mass
objects may explain some optically violently variable quasars. For example,
the quasar 0846+51 brightened by 4 magnitudes in a month and
then dimmed
by 1 magnitude in a few days. The fact that its line of sight is only 12
arcsec
from a galaxy suggests that the variation may result from microlensing
by one
of the halo objects, in which case the mass of the halo object must be
in the range 10-4 to 10-2
M.
More dramatic, but no less controversial, evidence for the effect of
microlensing on quasar luminosity comes from
Hawkins (1993),
who has been monitoring
300 quasars in the redshift range 1-3 over the past 17 years using a
wide-field
Schmidt camera. He finds quasi-sinusoidal variations of amplitude 0.5 m on a
5y timescale and he attributes this to lenses with mass ~ 10-3
M. The
crucial
point is that the timescale decreases with increasing z, which is
the opposite to
what one would expect for intrinsic variations (and these would be on a
shorter
timescale anyway). The timescale also increases with the luminosity of the
quasar. He tries to explain this by noting that the luminosity should
increase
with the size of the accretion disk, but this only works if the disk is
larger than
the Einstein radius of the lens(about 0.01 pc), which is
questionable. Another worrisome feature of Hawkins' claim
(cf Schneider 1993)
is that he requires the
density of the lenses to be close to critical (so that the sources are
being transited
continuously). In this case, Big Bang nucleosynthesis constraints
require the
lenses to be nonbaryonic, so he is forced to invoke primordial black holes.