The CDM scenario
of cosmic structure formation has been
well tested for perturbations that are still in the linear or quasilinear
phase of evolution. These tests are based, among other cosmological probes,
on accurate measurements of:
the CMBR temperature fluctuations at large and small angular scales
the large-scale mass power spectrum as traced by
the spatial distribution of
galaxies and cluster of galaxies, by the
Ly forest clouds, by
maps of gravitational weak and strong lensing, etc.
the peculiar large-scale motions of galaxies 13.
the statistics of strong gravitational lensing (multiple-lensed arcs).
Although these cosmological probes are based on observations of luminous
(baryonic) objects, the physics of baryons plays a minor or indirect
role in the properties of the linear mass perturbations. The situation
is different at small (galaxy) scales, where perturbations went into the
non-linear regime and the dissipative physics of baryons becomes
relevant. The interplay of DM and baryonic processes is crucial for
understanding galaxy formation and evolution. The progress in this
field was mostly heuristic; the
CDM scenario
provides the initial and
boundary conditions for modeling galaxy evolution, but the complex physics
of the baryonic processes, in the absence of fundamental theories,
requires a model adjustment through confrontation with the observations.
Following, I will outline some key concepts, ingredients, and results of
the galaxy evolution study based on the
CDM scenario. Some
of the pioneer papers in this field are those of Gunn
[57],
White & Reese
[131],
Fall & Efstathiou
[43],
Blumental et al.
[15],
Davis et al.
[36],
Katz & Gunn
[65],
White & Frenk
[130],
Kauffmann et al.
[66].
For useful lecture notes and recent reviews see e.g., Longair
[76,
77],
White
[129],
Steinmetz
[113],
Firmani & Avila-Reese
[46].
The main methods of studying galaxy formation and evolution in the
CDM context are:
Semi-analytical Models (e.g., [130, 66, 28, 9, 108, 29, 12, 10]), where the halo mass assembling histories are calculated with the extended Press-Schechter formalism and galaxies are seeded within the halos by means of phenomenological recipes. This method is very useful for producing whole populations of galaxies at a given epoch and predicting statistical properties as the luminosity function and the morphological mix.
Semi-numerical Models (e.g,
[45,
2,
119,
16]),
where the internal physics of the galaxies, including those of the
halos, are modeled numerically but under simplifying assumptions; the
initial and boundary conditions are
taken from the CDM
scenario by using the extended Press-Schechter
formalism and halo AM distributions from simulations. This method is
useful to predict the local properties of galaxies and correlations
among the global properties, as well as to follow the overall evolution
of individual galaxies.
Numerical N-body+hydrodyamical simulations (e.g., [65, 26, 64, 86, 112, 126, 1, 110, 56]), where the DM and baryonic processes are followed in cosmological simulations. This is the most advanced and complete approach to galaxy evolution. However, current limitations in the computational capabilities and the lack of fundamental theories for several of the physical processes involved, do not allow yet to exploit optimally this method. A great advance is being made currently with an hybrid approach: in the high-resolution cosmological N-body simulations of only DM, galaxies are grafted by using the semi-analytical models (e.g., [67, 60, 38, 13, 111, 63]).
The formation of galaxy disks deep inside the CDM halos is a generic
process in the CDM
scenario. Let us outline the (simplified) steps of disk galaxy formation
in this scenario:
1. DM halo growth. The "mold" for disk formation is provided by the mass and AM distributions of the virialized halo, which grows hierarchically. A description of these aspects were presented in the previous Section.
2. Gas cooling and infall, and the maximum mass of galaxies.
It is common to assume that the gas in a halo is shock-heated during
collapse to the virial temperature
[131].
The gas then cools radiatively and falls in a free-fall time to the
center. The cooling function
(n,
Tk; Z) depends on the gas density, temperature,
and composition
14.
Since the seminal work by White & Frenk (1990)
[130],
the rate infall of gas available to form the galaxy is assumed
to be driven either by the free-fall time, tff, if
tff > tcool
or by the cooling time tcool if tff
< tcool.
The former case applies to halos of masses smaller than
approximately 5 × 1011
M
, whilst the
latter applies to more massive halos.
The cooling flow from the quasistatic hot atmosphere is the process that
basically limits the baryonic mass of galaxies
[105],
and therefore the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function; for the
outer, dilute hot gas in large halos, tcool becomes
larger than the Hubble time. However, detailed calculations show that
even so, in massive halos too much gas cools, and the bright end of the
predicted luminosity function results with a decrease slower than the
observed one
[12].
Below we will see some solutions proposed to this problem.
More recently it was shown that the cooling of gas trapped in filaments
during the halo collapse may be so rapid that the gas flows along the
filaments to the center, thus avoiding shock heating
[69].
However, this process is efficient only for halos less massive than
2.5 × 1011
M, which in any
case (even if shock-heating happens), cool their gas very rapidly
[19].
Thus, for modeling the formation
of disks, and for masses smaller than ~ 5 × 1011
M
, we may assume
that gas infalls in a dynamical time since the halo has virialized, or in
two dynamical times since the protostructure was at its maximum expansion.
3. Disk formation, the origin of exponentially, and rotation curves.
The gas, originally distributed in mass and AM as the DM, cools and
collapses until it reaches centrifugal balance in a disk. Therefore,
assuming detailed AM conservation, the radial mass distribution of the
disk can be calculated by equating its specific AM to the AM of its
final circular orbit in centrifugal
equilibrium. The typical collapse factor of the gas within a DM halo is
~ 10 - 15 15, depending
on the initial halo spin parameter
; the higher the
, the more extended
(lower surface density) is the resulting disk. The surface density
profile of the disks
formed within CDM halos is nearly exponential, which provides an explanation
to the long-standing question of why galaxy disks are exponential. This
is a direct consequence of the AM distribution acquired by the halos
by tidal torques and mergers. In more
detail, however, the profiles are more concentrated in the center and with
a slight excess in the periphery than the exponential law
[45,
22].
The cusp in the central disk could give rise to either a photometrical bulge
[120]
or to a real kinematical bulge due to disk gravitational
instability enhanced by the higher central surface density
[2]
(bulge secular formation). In a few cases
(high-
,
low-concentrated halos), purely exponential disks can be formed.
Baryons are a small mass fraction in the CDM halos, however, the disk formed in the center is very dense (recall the high collapse factors), so that the contribution of the baryonic disk to the inner gravitational potential is important or even dominant. The formed disk will drag gravitationally DM, producing an inner halo contraction that is important to calculate for obtaining the rotation curve decomposition. The method commonly used to calculate it is based on the approximation of radial adiabatic invariance, where spherical symmetry and circular orbits are assumed (e.g., [47, 82]). However, the orbits in CDM halos obtained in N-body simulations are elliptical rather than circular; by generalizing the adiabatic invariance to elliptical orbits, the halo contraction becomes less efficient [132, 52].
The rotation curve decomposition of disks within contracted
CDM halos
are in general consistent with observations
[82,
45,
132]
(nearly-flat total rotation curves; maximum
disk for high-surface brightness disks; submaximum disk for the LSB
disks; in more detail, the outer rotation curve shape depends on
surface density, going from decreasing to increasing at the disk radius
for higher to lower densities, respectively). However, there are
important non-solved issues. For example, from a large sample of
observed rotation curves, Persic et al.
[95]
inferred that the rotation curve shapes are described by an "universal"
profile that (i) depends on the galaxy luminosity and (ii) implies a halo
profile different from the CDM (NFW) profile. Other studies confirm
only partially these claims
[123,
132,
25].
Statistical studies of rotation curves are very important for testing the
CDM scenario.
In general, the structure and dynamics of disks formed within
CDM halos
under the assumption of detailed AM conservation seem to be consistent with
observations. An important result to remark is the successful prediction
of the
infrared Tully-Fisher relation and its scatter
16. The core problem
mentioned in Section 4.2 is
the most serious potential difficulty.
Other potential difficulties are: (i) the predicted disk size
(surface brightness) distribution implies a
P(
)
distribution narrower than that corresponding to
CDM halos by
almost a factor of two
[74];
(ii) the internal AM distribution inferred from observations
of dwarf galaxies seems not to be in agreement with the
CDM halo AM
distribution
[122];
(iii) the inference of the halo profile from the statistical study of
rotation curve shapes seems not to be agreement with CMD halos.
In N-body+hydrodynamical simulations of disk galaxy formation there was
common
another difficulty called the 'angular momentum catastrophe': the simulated
disks ended too much concentrated, apparently due to AM transference of
baryons to DM during the gas collapse. The formation of highly concentrated
disks also affects the shape of the rotation curve (strongly decreasing),
as well as the zero-point of the Tully-Fisher relation. Recent numerical
simulations are showing that the 'angular momentum catastrophe',
rather than a physical problem, is a problem related to the resolution
of the simulations and the correct inclusion of feedback effects.
4. Star formation and feedback. We are coming to the less understood and most complicated aspects of the models of galaxy evolution, which deserve separate notes. The star formation (SF) process is studied at two levels (each one by two separated communities!): (i) the small-scale physics, related to the complex processes by which the cold gas inside molecular clouds fragments and collapses into stars, and (ii) the large-scale physics, related to the disk global instabilities that give rise to the largest unities of SF, the molecular clouds. The SF physics incorporated to galaxy evolution models is still oversimplified, phenomenological and refers to the latter item. The large-scale SF cycle in normal galaxies is believed to be self-regulated by a balance between the energy injection due to SF (mainly SNe) and dissipation (radiative or turbulent). Two main approaches have been used to describe the SF self-regulation in models of galaxy evolution: (a) the halo cooling-feedback approach [130]), (b) the disk turbulent ISM approach [44, 124].
According to the former, the cool gas is reheated by the "galaxy" SF
feedback and driven back to the intrahalo medium until it again
cools
radiatively and collapses into the galaxy. This approach has been used in
semi-analytical models of galaxy formation where the internal structure
and hydrodynamics of the disks are not treated in detail. The
reheating rate is assumed to depend on the halo circular velocity
Vc:
rh
s
/ Vc
, where
s is the
SF rate (SFR) and
2. Thus, the galaxy SFR,
gas fraction and luminosity depend on Vc. In these
models, the disk ISM is
virtually ignored and the SN-energy injection is assumed to be as
efficient as to reheat the cold gas up to the virial temperature
of the halo. A drawback of the model is that it predicts hot X-ray halos
around disk galaxies much more luminous than those observed.
Approach (b) is more appropriate for models where the internal processes of the disk are considered. In this approach, the SF at a given radius r is assumed to be triggered by disk gravitational instabilities (Toomre criterion) and self-regulated by a balance between energy injection (mainly by SNe) and dissipation in the turbulent ISM in the direction perpendicular to the disk plane:
![]() |
(15) (16) |
where vg and
g are the
gas velocity dispersion and surface density,
is the epicyclic
frequency, Qcrit is a critical value for instability,
SN
and
SN
are the kinetic energy injection efficiency of the SN into the gas and
the SN energy generated per gram of gas transformed into stars,
respectively,
* is the surface SFR, and
E,accr is the kinetic energy input due to
mass accretion rate (or eventually any other energy source as AGN
feedback). The key parameter in the self-regulating process is the
dissipation time td. The disk ISM is a turbulent,
non-isothermal, multi-temperature
flow. Turbulent dissipation in the ISM is typically efficient
(td ~ 107 - 108yr) in such a way
that self-regulation happens at the characteristic vertical scales of
the disk. Thus, there is not too much room for strong feedback with the
gas at heights larger than the vertical scaleheigth of normal present-day
disks: self-regulation is at
the level of the disk, but not at the level of the gas corona around.
With this approach the predicted SFR is proportional to
gn
(Schmidt law), with n
1.4 - 2 varying along
the disk, in good agreement with observational inferences. The typical
SF timescales are not longer than 3 - 4 Gyr. Therefore, to keep
active SFRs in the disks, gas infall is necessary, a condition perfectly
fulfilled in the
CDM scenario.
Given the SFR radius by radius and time by time, and assuming an IMF, the corresponding luminosities in different color bands can be calculated with stellar population synthesis models. The final result is then an evolving inside-out luminous disk with defined global and local colors.
5. Secular evolution The "quiet" evolution of galaxy disks as described above can be disturbed by minor mergers (satellite accretion) and interactions with close galaxy companions. However, as several studies have shown, the disk may suffer even intrinsic instabilities which lead to secular changes in its structure, dynamics, and SFR. The main effects of secular evolution, i.e. dynamical processes that act in a timescale longer than the disk dynamical time, are the vertical thickening and "heating" of the disk, the formation of bars, which are efficient mechanisms of radial AM and mass redistribution, and the possible formation of (pseudo)bulges (see for recent reviews [71, 33]). Models of disk galaxy evolution should include these processes, which also can affect disk properties, for example increasing the disk scale radii [117].
As mentioned in Section 2, the simple
appearance, the dominant old stellar populations,
the -elements
enhancement, and the dynamically hot structure of
spheroids suggest that they were formed by an early (z
4) single violent
event with a strong burst of star formation, followed by passive
evolution of their stellar population (monolithic
mechanism). Nevertheless, both observations and theory point out to a
more complex situation. There are two ways to define the formation epoch
of a spheroid: when most of its stars formed or when the stellar
spheroid acquired its dynamical properties in violent or secular
processes. For the monolithic collapse mechanism both epochs coincide.
In the context of the
CDM scenario,
spheroids are expected to be formed
basically as the result of major mergers of disks. However,
if the major mergers occur at high redshifts, when the disks are mostly gaseous, then the situation is close to the monolithic collapse;
if the major mergers occur at low redshifts, when the galaxies have already transformed a large fraction of their gas into stars, then the spheroids assemble by the "classical" dissipationless collision.
Besides, stellar disks may develop spheroids in their centers (bulges) by
secular evolution mechanisms, both intrinsic or enhanced by minor
mergers and
interactions; this channel of spheroid formation should work for
late-type galaxies and it is supported by a large body of observations
[71].
But the picture is even more complex in the hierarchical
cosmogony as galaxy morphology may be continuously changing, depending
on the MAH (smooth accretion and violent mergers) and environment. An
spheroid formed early should continue accreting gas so that a new,
younger disk grows around. A naive expectation in the context of the
CDM scenario
is that massive elliptical galaxies should be assembled mainly by late
major mergers of the smaller galaxies in the hierarchy. It is also
expected that the disks in galaxies with small bulge-to-disk
ratios should be on average redder than those in galaxies with large
bulge-to-disk ratios, contrary to observations.
Although it is currently subject of debate, a more elaborate
picture of spheroid formation is emerging now in the context of the
CDM
hierarchical scenario (see
[106,
46,
39]
and the references therein).
The basic ideas are that massive ellipticals formed early (z
3)
and in a short timescale by the merging of gas-rich disks in rare
high-peak, clustered regions of the
Universe. The complex physics of the merging implies (i) an ultraluminous
burst of SF obscured by dust (cool ULIRG phase) and the establishment of
a spheroidal
structure, (ii) gas collapse to the center, a situation that favors the
growth of the preexisting massive black hole(s) through an Eddington or even
super-Eddington regime (warm ULIRG phase), (iii) the switch on of the AGN
activity associated to the supermassive black hole when reaching a critical
mass, reverting then the gas inflow to gas outflow (QSO phase), (iv) the
switch off of the AGN activity leaving a giant stellar spheroid with a
supermassive
black hole in the center and a hot gas corona around (passive elliptical
evolution). In principle, the hot corona may cool by cooling flows and
increase the mass of the galaxy, likely renewing a disk around the spheroid.
However, it seems that recurrent AGN phases (less energetic than the initial
QSO phase) are possible during the life of the spheroid. Therefore, the
energy injected from AGN in the form of radio jets (feedback) can be
responsible
for avoiding the cooling flow. This way is solved the problem of disk
formation around the elliptical, as well as the problem of the extended
bright end in the luminosity function. It is also important to note that
as soon as the halo hosting the elliptical becomes a subhalo of the group
or cluster, the MAH is truncated (Section 4).
According to the model just
described, massive elliptical galaxies were in place at high redshifts,
while less massive galaxies (collapsing from more common density peaks)
assembled later. This model was called downsizing or
anti-hierarchical. In spite of the name, it fits perfectly within the
hierarchical
CDM scenario.
5.3. Drivers of the Hubble sequence
Disks are generic objects formed by gas dissipation and collapse inside the growing CDM halos. Three (cosmological) initial and boundary conditions related to the halos define the main properties of disks in isolated halos:
The virial mass, which determines extensive properties
The spin parameter
, which determines
mainly the
disk surface brightness (SB; it gives rise to the sequence from
high SB to low SB disks) and strongly influences the rotation
curve shape and the bulge-to-disk ratio (within the secular scenario).
also plays some role
in the SFR history.
The MAH, which drives the gas infall rate and, therefore, the disk SFR and color; the MAH determines also the halo concentration, and its scatter is reflected in the scatter of the Tully-Fisher relation.
The two latter determine the intensive properties of disks,
suggesting a biparametrical sequence in SB and color.
There is a fourth important parameter, the galaxy baryon
fraction fB, which influences the disk SB and rotation
curve shape. We have seen that fB in galaxies is
3-5 times lower than the universal
B /
DM
fraction. This parameter is related probably to astrophysical
processes as gas dissipation and feedback.
The clustering of CDM halos follows an spatial distribution with very different large-scale environments. In low-density environments, halos live mostly isolated, favoring the formation of disks, whose properties are driven by the factors mentioned above. However, as we move to higher-density environments, halos form from more and more clustered high-peak perturbations that assemble early by violent major mergers: this is the necessary condition to form massive ellipticals. At some time, the larger scale in the hierarchy collapses and the halo becomes a subhalo: the mass aggregation is then truncated and the probability of merging decreases dramatically. Elliptical galaxies are settled and continue evolving passively. Thus, the environment of CDM halos is another important driver of the Hubble sequence, able to establish the main body of the observed blue-red and early-type morphology sequences and their dependences on density.
Although the initial, boundary and environmental
conditions provided by the
CDM scenario are
drivers of several of the main
properties and correlations of galaxies, astrophysical processes should also
play an important role. The driving astrophysical processes are
global SF and feedback. They should come in two modes that drive
the disk and elliptical sequences: (i) the quiescent
disk mode, where disk instabilities trigger SF and local (negative)
feedback
self-regulates the SFR, and (ii) the bursting mode of violent mergers
of gaseous galaxies, where local shocks and gravothermal catastrophe trigger
SF, and presumably a positive feedback increases its efficiency.
Other important astrophysical drivers of galaxy properties are:
(i) the SN-induced wind-driven outflows, which are important to shape
the properties of dwarf galaxies (M
1010
M
,
Vm
80 km/s), (ii) the AGN-induced hydrodynamical outflows, which are important
to prevent cooling flows in massive ellipticals, (iii) several processes
typical of high-density environments such as ram pressure, harassment,
strangulation,
etc., presumably important to shape some properties of galaxies in
clusters.
13 Recall that linear theory relates the peculiar velocity, that is the velocity deviation from the Hubble flow, to the density contrast. It is said that the cosmological velocity field is potential; any primordial rotational motion able to give rise to a density perturbation decays as the Universe expands due to angular momentum conservation. Back.
14 The main cooling
processes for the intrahalo gas are collisional excitation and ionization,
recombination, and bremsstrahlung. The former is the most efficient for
kinetic temperatures Tk
104 -
105 K and for neutral hydrogen and single ionized
helium; for a meta-enriched gas, cooling is efficient at temperatures
between 105 - 107 K. At higher temperatures, where
the gas is completely ionized,
the dominant cooling process is bremsstrahlung. At temperatures lower than
104 K (small halos) and in absence of metals, the main
cooling process is by
H2 and HD molecule line emission.
Back.
15 It is interesting to note that in
the absence of a massive halo around galaxies, the collapse factor would
be larger by ~ M / Md
20, where M
and Md are the total halo and
disk masses, respectively
[90].
Back.
16 In
Section 4.1 we have
shown that the basis of the Tully-Fisher relation is the CDM halo
M - Vm relation.
From the pure halo to the disk+halo system there are several intermediate
processes that could distort the original
M - Vm relation. However, it
was shown that the way in which the CDM halo couples with the disk and
the way galaxies transform their gas into stars "conspire" to keep the
relation. Due to this conspiring, the Tully-Fisher relation is robust to
variations in the baryon fraction fB (or
mass-to-luminosity ratios) and in the spin
parameter
[45].
Back.