For dust with sizes much smaller than the wavelength
of the incident radiation, analytic solutions to the
light scattering problem exist for certain shapes.
Let a be the characteristic length of the dust,
and x
2
a /
be the dimensionless
size parameter.
Under the condition of x << 1 and |mx| << 1
(i.e. in the "Rayleigh" regime), Cabs =
4
k
Im{
},
Csca =
(8
/3) k4
|
|2,
where
is the
complex electric polarizability
of the dust. Apparently, Csca <<
Cabs and Cext
Cabs.
In general,
is a diagonalized tensor; 7
for homogeneous spheres composed of an isotropic material,
it is independent of direction
![]() |
(32) |
where V is the dust volume. 8 For a homogeneous, isotropic ellipsoid, the polarizability for electric field vector parallel to its principal axis j is
![]() |
(35) |
where Lj is the "depolarization factor"
along principal axis j (see
[13]).
The electric polarizability
is also known
for concentric core-mantle spheres
[69],
confocal core-mantle ellipsoids
[13,
19],
and multi-layered ellipsoids of equal-eccentricity
[18].
For a thin conducting cylindrical rod
with length 2l and radius ra << l,
the polarizability along the axis of the rod is
[38]
![]() |
(36) |
In astronomical modeling, the most commonly invoked grain shapes are spheres and spheroids (oblates or prolates). 9 In the Rayleigh regime, their absorption and scattering properties are readily obtained from Eqs. (32,35). For both dielectric and conducting spheres (as long as x << 1 and |mx| << 1)
![]() |
(37) |
At long wavelengths, for dielectric dust
"
while
' approaches
a constant much larger than
"
(see Eqs. 18,19), we see Cabs
"
2;
for metallic dust,
"
1/
while
'
approaches a constant much smaller
than
"
(see Eqs. 22,23), we see Cabs
/
"
2;
therefore, for both dielectric and metallic dust
Cabs
-2 at long
wavelengths! 10
It is also seen from Eq. (37) that for spherical dust in the Rayleigh
regime the albedo
0,
and the radiation cross section Cpr
Cabs.
This has an interesting implication. Let
pr(a) be the ratio of
the radiation pressure force to the gravity
of a spherical grain of radius a
in the solar system or in debris disks
illuminated by stars (of radius R*
and mass M*) with a stellar flux of
F
* at the top of the atmosphere
[53],
![]() |
(38) |
where G is the gravitational constant,
and dust is the mass density
of the dust. For grains in the Rayleigh regime
(g
0; Csca << Cabs;
Cabs
a3), we see
pr
Cabs / a3
is independent of the grain size a
(see Fig. 4)!
![]() |
Figure 4.
|
Spheroids are often invoked to model the interstellar polarization.
In the Rayleigh approximation, their absorption cross sections
for light polarized parallel (||) or perpendicular
()
to the grain symmetry axis are
11
![]() |
(39) |
where the depolarization factors parallel (L||)
or perpendicular
(L)
to the grain symmetry axis are not independent,
but related to each other through L|| +
2L
= 1, with
![]() |
(40) |
for prolates (ra > rb)
where e
is the eccentricity, and
![]() |
(41) |
for oblates (ra < rb).
For spheres L|| =
L = 1/3 and
e
= 0. For extremely elongated prolates or "needles"
(ra >> rb), it is apparent
Cabs
<< Cabs||,
we thus obtain
![]() |
(42) |
where L||
(rb / ra)2
ln(ra / rb).
For dielectric needles, Cabs
"
-2 at long
wavelengths since L||(
' - 1) + 1
>> L||
" (see
[45]);
for metallic needles, for a given value of
"
one can always find a sufficiently long needle with
L||
" < 1 and
L||(
' - 1) << 1 so that
Cabs
"
which can be very large
(see
[45]).
Because of their unique optical properties, metallic needles with
high electrical conductivities (e.g. iron needles,
graphite whiskers) are resorted to
explain a wide variety of astrophysical phenomena:
(1) as a source of starlight opacity to create
a non-cosmological microwave background by
the thermalization of starlight in a steady-state cosmology
[27];
(2) as a source of the grey opacity needed to explain
the observed redshift-magnitude relation of Type Ia
supernovae without invoking a positive cosmological constant
[1];
(3) as the source for the submm excess observed
in the Cas A supernova remnant
[16];
and (4) as an explanation for the flat 3-8 µm extinction
observed for lines of sight toward the Galactic Center
and in the Galactic plane
[15].
However, caution should be taken in using Eq. 42
(i.e. the Rayleigh approximation) since the Rayleigh criterion
2
ra
|m| /
<< 1
is often not satisfied for highly conducting needles (see
[45]).
12
In astronomical spectroscopy modeling, the continuous distribution of ellipsoid (CDE) shapes has been widely used to approximate the spectra of irregular dust grains by averaging over all ellipsoidal shape parameters [6]. In the Rayleigh limit, this approach, assuming that all ellipsoidal shapes are equally probable, has a simple expression for the average cross section
![]() |
(43) |
where Log
is the principal value of the logarithm of
.
The CDE approach, resulting in a significantly-broadened spectral band
(but with its maximum reduced), seems to fit the experimental
absorption spectra of solids better than Mie theory.
Although the CDE may indeed represent a distribution
of shape factors caused either by highly irregular
dust shapes or by clustering of spherical grains into
irregular agglomerates, one should caution that
the shape distribution of cosmic dust does not seem likely to resemble
the CDE, which assumes that extreme shapes
like needles and disks are equally probable.
A more reasonable shape distribution function would
be like dP / dL|| = 12 L||
(1 - L||)2
which peaks at spheres (L|| = 1/3).
This function is symmetric about spheres with respect to
eccentricity e and drops to zero for
the extreme cases: infinitely thin needles
(e
1,
L||
0)
or infinitely flattened pancakes (e
,
L||
1).
Averaging over the shape distribution,
the resultant absorption cross section is Cabs =
01
dL|| dP / dL||
Cabs(L||) where
Cabs(L||) is
the absorption cross section of a particular shape L||
[62,
49,
48].
Alternatively, Fabian et al.
[17]
proposed a quadratic weighting for the shape distribution,
"with near-spherical shapes being most probable".
When a dust grain is very large compared with the wavelength,
the electromagnetic radiation may be treated by geometric
optics: Qext
Cext / Cgeo
2
if x
2
a /
>> 1
and |m - 1| x >> 1.
13
For these grains (g
1;
Cabs
Cgeo),
the ratio of the radiation pressure to gravity
pr
Cabs / a3
1 / a.
This is demonstrated in Figure 4.
For dust with x >> 1
and |m - 1| x << 1,
one can use the "anomalous diffraction" theory
[69].
For dust with |m - 1| x << 1 and |m -
1| << 1, one can use the Rayleigh-Gans approximation
14
to obtain the absorption and scattering cross sections
[6
39
69]:
![]() |
(44) |
It is important to note that the Rayleigh-Gans approximation is invalid for modeling the X-ray scattering by interstellar dust at energies below 1 keV. This approximation systematically and substantially overestimates the intensity of the X-ray halo below 1 keV [66].
7
can be diagonalized
by appropriate choice
of Cartesian coordinate system. It describes the linear
response of a dust grain to applied electric field E:
p =
E
where p is the induced electric dipole moment.
Back.
8 For a dielectric sphere with dielectric function given in Eq. (17), in the Rayleigh regime the absorption cross section is
![]() |
(33) |
Similarly, for a metallic sphere with dielectric function given in Eq. (21),
![]() |
(34) |
It is seen that the frequency-dependent absorption cross section for both dielectric and metallic spheres is a Drude function. This is also true for ellipsoids. Back.
9 Spheroids are a special class of ellipsoids. Let ra, rb, and rc be the semi-axes of an ellipsoid. For spheroids, rb = rc. Prolates with ra > rb are generated by rotating an ellipse (of semi-major axis ra and semi-minor axis rb) about its major axis; oblates with ra < rb are generated by rotating an ellipse (of semi-minor axis ra and semi-major axis rb) about its minor axis. Back.
10 However, various astronomical data
suggest a flatter wavelength-dependence
(i.e. Cabs
-
with
< 2):
< 2 in
the far-IR/submm wavelength range
has been reported for interstellar molecular clouds,
circumstellar disks around young stars, and
circumstellar envelopes around evolved stars.
Laboratory measurements have also found
< 2
for certain cosmic dust analogues. In literature, the flatter
(
< 2)
long-wavelength opacity law is commonly attributed to
grain growth by coagulation of small dust into large
fluffy aggregates (see
[47]
and references therein). However, as shown in Eq. (31),
the Kramers-Kronig relation requires
that
should be larger than 1 for
since F is a finite number
and the integration in the left-hand-side of Eq. (31)
should be convergent although we cannot rule out
< 1
over a finite range of wavelengths.
Back.
11 For grains spinning around the
principal axis of the largest moment of inertia,
the polarization cross sections are
Cpol = (Cabs||
- Cabs) / 2 for prolates,
and Cpol = (Cabs
- Cabs||) for oblates;
the absorption cross sections for randomly-oriented spheroids are
Cabs = (Cabs|| +
2Cabs
) / 3
[42].
Back.
12 The "antenna theory" has been applied
for conducting needle-like dust to estimate its absorption cross sections
[75].
Let it be represented by a circular cylinder
of radius ra and length l (ra
<< l). Let
R
be its resistivity. The absorption cross section is given by
Cabs = (4
/
3c)(
ra2 l /
R),
with a long wavelength cutoff of
o =
R
c (l / ra)2 /
ln(l / ra)2,
and a short-wavelength cutoff of
min
(2
c
me) /
(
R
ne e2),
where me, e, and ne are
respectively the mass, charge, and number density of
the charge-carrying electrons.
Back.
13 At a first glance,
Qext
2 appears to contradict "common sense" by implying that a large grain
removes twice the energy that is incident on it!
This actually can be readily understood in terms
of basic optics principles: (1) on one hand, all rays impinging on the
dust are either scattered or absorbed.
This gives rise to a contribution of Cgeo
to the extinction cross section.
(2) On the other hand, all the rays in the field
which do not hit the dust give rise to
a diffraction pattern that is, by Babinet's principle,
identical to the diffraction through a hole of area Cgeo.
If the detection excludes this diffracted light
then an additional contribution of Cgeo is made
to the total extinction cross section
[6].
Back.
14 The conditions for the Rayleigh-Gans
approximation
to be valid are |m - 1| << 1
and |m - 1| x << 1.
The former ensures that the reflection from the surface
of the dust is negligible (i.e. the impinging light
enters the dust instead of being reflected);
the latter ensures that the phase of the incident wave
is not shifted inside the dust.
For sufficiently small scattering angles,
it is therefore possible for the waves scattered
throughout the dust to add coherently.
The intensity (I) of the scattered waves is
proportional to the number (N) of scattering sites squared:
I
N2
2
a6
(where
is
the mass density of the dust). This is why the X-ray halos
(usually within ~ 1° surrounding a distant X-ray point source;
[63])
created by the small-angle scattering of X-rays
by interstellar dust are often used to probe the size
(particularly the large size end;
[14,
67,
73]),
morphology (compact or porous;
[58,
66]),
composition, and spatial distribution of dust.
Back.