The component of velocity perpendicular to the equatorial plane is vital for AGN black hole mass determinations! Without this strong turbulent velocity component, variations in sini would introduce substantial scatter into AGN black hole mass estimates, especially since type-1 AGNs are observed close to face-on. There is recent evidence that there is remarkably little scatter in AGN mass estimates. Firstly, it has become apparent (Bochkarev & Gaskell 2009) that the two main methods of estimating black hole masses from the BLR agree surprisingly well. The Dibai single-epoch-spectrum method (Dibai 1977) and reverberation mapping methods agree to within the expected errors. Gaskell (2009b) has shown furthermore that a simple refinement of the method produces even better agreement. The agreements mean that such methods are estimating the effective radii of the BLR correctly. As Bochkarev & Gaskell (2009) discuss, the success of the Dibai method means that the inner regions of AGNs are very similar. In particular:
Both the Dibai and reverberation-mapping methods
of estimating black hole masses depend on observed BLR line widths, so
geometric differences and orientation effects will affect both
methods. An important external check on the accuracy of AGN
black hole mass estimates is provided by the tightness of the
relationship between black hole mass,
M, and
luminosity, Lhost, of the bulge of the host
galaxy.
Gaskell
& Kormendy (2009)
have recently shown that estimating
M
by
the Dibai method and
Lhost from the fraction of starlight in SDSS
spectra gives a scatter of ± 0.23 dex in
logM
(see Fig. 14).
Bentz et
al. (2009b)
have estimated
Lhost completely independently for a different
set of AGNs using HST photometry and published reverberation mapping
mass estimates. They get a scatter in
logM
of
± 0.33 dex. Both of these scatters in the AGN
M
-
logLhost
relationships are smaller than the ± 0.38 dex scatter
Gultekin et
al. (2009)
and others find when
M
is
determined by stellar dynamical
methods, but they are still greater than the ± 0.17 dex scatter in
the M
-
*
relationship for pure bulge (i.e., barless) galaxies
(Graham 2008).
The Dibai method and the method proposed by
Gaskell (2009b)
seems to give particularly tight
M
-
* and
M
- Lbulge
relationships for the most massive elliptical galaxies
(Gaskell 2009a).
This is probably because they have the least intrinsic scatter in the
M
-
*
relationship. These comparisons with predictions from host galaxy
properties imply that black hole mass determinations from the BLR are
surprisingly accurate - as accurate as the best stellar-dynamical
estimates. This accuracy of black hole mass estimates made using the BLR
provides strong support for all type-1 AGNs being very similar as far as
the structure and kinematics of the BLR goes, and for orientation
effects being minimal. The accuracy of AGN black hole mass estimates is
thus consistent with there being a substantial turbulent BLR velocity
component and type-1 AGNs being seen close to pole-on.
![]() |
Figure 14. The
M |