4.1. Black holes as sources of IGM magnetic fields
The very largest BH-fed radio sources appear to have lost the least
energy in other forms (e.g. PdV expansion work) as they expand into
space, and in this sense are the best quantitative calibrators of
gravitational-to-magnetic energy in the IGM
[19].
Figure 9 illustrates this with a plot of the
estimated energy content of giant radio sources. It is less than 2
orders of magnitude below the gravitational infall energy (to the
Schwarzschild radius) of a 109
M black
hole. Various corrections discussed in
[19],
such as particle diffusion
etc. would correct the GRG points upward, and the BH energy downward,
thus further narrowing the energy gap. The gap between the cluster
sources and the giant radio lobes is approximately the independently
measurable PdV work done as the lobes expand against the pressure of the
ICM.
![]() |
Figure 9. Radio lobe energy content for extended sources within galaxy clusters (squares) and the very largest BH-powered radio sources (diamonds) showing that the upper envelope of the latter is within 2 orders of magnitude of the putative gravitational formation energy of the central supermassive black hole [19]. |
The high efficiency of the gravitational to magnetic energy conversion
implied by Fig 8, combined with
the known space density of > 106
M black holes,
~ 105
M
/
Mpc3, implies a global magnetic energy density in the galaxy
over-dense zones (the galaxy filament zones of LSS) which is
![]() |
(4) |
B is the
intergalactic energy density,
B is
gravitational to magnetic energy conversion efficiency factor,
fRG the fraction of all L*
galaxies that produce radio lobes over a Hubble time, and
fVOLFILAMENTS is the volume fraction of the
mature universe (still well beyond a GZK distance) that is occupied by
LSS filaments, i.e. the complement of the cosmic void
fraction. For the normalizations adopted in (4), the corresponding
intergalactic magnetic field strength is
![]() |
(5) |
Before describing some first attempts below to detect and measure IGM fields, I now turn to another, though less quantifiable source of intergalactic fields due to star-driven outflows.
4.2 Early dwarf galaxy outflows before z ~ 7 as sources of IGM magnetic fields
Using detailed starburst outflow parameters measured for a mass range of
galaxies down to ~ 108
M it is
possible to project such data backwards in Cosmic time to z
10, where the ~1000x
smaller co-moving volumes might have contained mostly dwarf galaxies,
since hierarchical merging into larger galaxies will have taken place
mostly after that time. At z
10, each co-expanding
"cell" will be more easily filled with star and supernova-driven
magnetized winds.
![]() |
Figure 10. A cartoon dwarf galaxy outflow
filling of the IGM.
|
As time progresses toward the present epoch, these co-expanding cells
will retain their volume filling factor from early times when they were
small in absolute size. Model calculations of this kind
[20]
show two interesting results that persist over a wide range of model
parameters: First, the global fraction,
[
VF]
in Fig. 10, of IGM volume within the galaxy
filament zones that is ultimately filled with dwarf galaxy outflow
magneto-plasma reaches
20% of
[
VA]
by the present epoch (z = 0). Second, in a variety of model
parameter combinations this substantial filling factor nearly reaches
the z = 0 value by z ~ 7
[20].
If the
"VF
clouds" were to expand adiabatically as Proper Time proceeds, this
collective starburst outflow contribution to
<|BIGM|> within the galaxy filament zones would
reach ~ 10-8 to 10-9 G by z = 0. However,
as Ryu, Vishniac, and others have recently calculated, large scale
gravitationally-driven inflow into filaments, galaxies and galaxy groups
evolve is accompanied by large scale shearing and turbulence of the IGM gas
[21,
22].
These models produce an amplified <|BIGM|> in
galaxy filaments that reaches as high as ~ 10-7 G. Although
these calculated scenarios are more removed from confirming
observations, it is interesting that is can they can produce
<|BIGM|> in filaments that are comparable with
the supermassive BH - generated IGM fields in equation (5). The
implication for UHECR propagation and anisotropy modeling is for a high
contrast in <|BIGM|> between the filaments and
voids of the local universe.