Here it is worth recalling that the "empty" IGM, including the voids, is
permeated by photons, by which we mean the EBL at all photon
energies. Particles with energy EP
1018
eV interact with other particles and photons, so that all of space
becomes a (passive) particle physics laboratory. This fact is partially
illustrated in Figure 13. At some rate,
galaxy-supplied particles and magnetic fields will diffuse out of the
walls and filaments into the voids. The cosmic voids are also the place
to look for a pre-galactic, or primordial field. However at this point,
the detection of magnetic fields in cosmic voids still lies mostly in
the realm of Gedanken experiments.
For VHE particles the time of arrival, deflection, energy, and
composition can all be measured in principle, and calculated.
Figure 13, is based on ideas originally
advanced by R. Plaga
[25],
and is a concept illustration of reactions and deflections in a
intergalactic magnetic field. It is based on the existence of a burst
event producing - rays
(
-ray
burster), neutrinos, and/or hadrons, all at very high energies. The
first VHE
-rays
could be products of original VHE hadrons.
If the electron Larmor radii for BIGM
10-12 G are sufficiently large, we might see a coherent
photon cascade, where lower energy photons in path 1 mark the un-delayed
arrival time. For BIGM
10-12 G we would observe a photon halo around the source of
the bursting event. In this case (3 in
Fig. 13), the halo size and
spectrum would lead to an estimate of the magnetic field strength in the
intergalactic vicinity of the source. Depending on the parameter space,
the radiation could be pair annihilation radiation at 0.5 MeV, or
electron/positron synchrotron radiation.
Time delays, and energy losses for intergalactic protons propagating in
an intergalactic magnetic field have been calculated and discussed by
Stanev et al.
[26].
Observable effects for proton propagation here refer to a higher regime
of BIGM, in the vicinity of 10-9 G. The
reader could consult the interesting paper by Stanev et al.
[26]
for an informative discussion of loss mechanisms (GZK, Bethe-Heitler,
etc.), and other UHECR propagation effects.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to thank my many co-workers for their contributions to the material I have presented here. I thank the organizers for their invitation to participate in this very interesting meeting, and Dr Henry Glass for his invaluable assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
This work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, to LANL, and NSERC (Canada).