While the above discussions have concentrated on distant clusters of galaxies and on the integrated Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effects of clusters and the diffuse intergalactic medium, it is also interesting to consider the possibility of distortions of the microwave background radiation induced by gas in the local group.
Suto et al.
(1996)
have proposed that gas in the local group
may contribute to the apparent large-scale anisotropy of the CMBR
(specifically, the quadrupolar anisotropy) through the
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect. If the
local group contains a spherical gas halo, described by an isothermal
model (equation
64) and with the Galaxy offset a distance x0 from its
center, then the limit on the value of y
from the COBE FIRAS data implies that
if x0 << rc. Electron concentrations
this small
cause a dipole anisotropy of the CMBR that is much
smaller than the observed dipole anisotropy, but may produce
a significant quadrupole. Suto et al. suggest that
this quadrupole may be as large as 40 µK without violating
either the X-ray background
limits or the COBE FIRAS limits. Since the observed COBE quadrupole is
only Qrms = 6 ± 3 µK
(Bennett et al.
1994),
significantly less than Qrms-PS derived from the overall
spectrum of fluctuations, a
local Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect may help to explain why we observe an
anomalously small quadrupole moment in the CMBR.
This ingenious explanation of the COBE quadrupole in terms of a local
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect has been criticized by
Pildis & McGaugh (1996),
who note that to produce a significant quadrupole the electron
density in the local group needs to exceed the value typical of
distant groups of galaxies by a factor
10. Thus gas in the
local group is unlikely to produce a significant contribution to the
COBE quadrupole. Furthermore,
Banday & Gorski (1996)
found that the full model Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect predicted by Suto
et al., when
fitted to the COBE dataset, cannot produce a large enough quadrupolar
term to be interesting. Nevertheless, it is clear that local gas may cause
some small contributions to microwave background anisotropies on
angular scales normally thought to be ``cosmological'', and care will
be needed in interpreting signals at levels
0.1 µK.