Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1992. 30:
499-542 Copyright © 1992 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved |
3.2 The Age of the Universe
By a trivial change of variables in Equation 9, from a to z and from to t, we obtain an integral that relates redshift z1 to lookback time from the present,
This integral can be solved analytically in some special cases, e.g.
when = 0
(Kolb & Turner 1990,
equations 3.22-3.25;
Sandage 1961a)
or when tot = 1
(Weinberg 1989).
In general, it can be calculated
numerically without difficulty. By inspection of the integrand, one
sees that at fixed
M, increasing
lengthens the lookback time to
any redshift. Eliminating in
favor of tot, one
likewise finds that
at fixed tot, the
lookback time to any z lengthens for decreasing
M.
Figure 3 shows the lookback time as a
function of redshift for the five models A-E.
The integral in Equation 16 goes to a finite limit, the age of the
universe, as z1 ->
.
Kolb & Turner (1990)
give analytic formulas for
the special cases = 0 and
tot = 1 (see also
Sandage 1961a).
Figure 4
shows the results of numerical integration for general cases with
,
tot in the same
range that was shown in
Figure 1. One sees that if
M,
is bounded to a plausible range, then the age of the universe is
between about 0.5 and 2 Hubble times. In
Section 4.2 we will compare
these ages to observational constraints.
Figure 4. Contours of the age of the
universe are shown in the
M,
tot)
plane. Away from the infinity line, the contours are close to straight
lines, and Equation 17 is a good analytic approximation.
Because the contours in Figure 4 are not too
different from lines of
constant slope, one can readily write a simple approximation that is
valid to within a few percent in the range 0 <
M
1, 0 <
tot
1,and
serviceable anywhere away from the loitering line;
where
and ``sinn-1'' is defined as sinh-1 if
a
1 (the usual case) and as
sin-1 if
a > 1. (In fact,
Equation 17 is the exact result when
tot = 1.)