| © CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1997
| |
1.4 Brief Outline of Stellar Evolution
(1) | An interstellar cloud collapses forming a generation of stars. The masses of the stars are spread over a range from maybe 0.01 M or less to maybe 100M or so. The distribution function of stellar masses at birth, known as the ``initial mass function'' (IMF), has more small stars than big ones.
| ||
(2) | The young stars, which appear as variable stars with emission lines known as T Tauri stars and related classes, initially derive their energy from gravitational contraction, which leads to a steady increase in their internal temperature (see Chapter 5). Eventually the central temperature becomes high enough (~ 107 K or 1 keV) to switch on hydrogen burning and the star lies on the ``zero-age main sequence'' (ZAMS) of the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram in which luminosity is plotted against surface temperature (Fig. 1.6). Stars spend most of their lives (about 80 per cent) in a main-sequence band stretching slightly upwards from the ZAMS; the corresponding time is short (a few x 106 years) for the most massive and luminous stars and very long (> 1010 years) for stars smaller then the Sun, because the luminosity varies as a high power of the mass and so bigger stars use up their nuclear fuel supplies faster. | ||
(3) | When hydrogen in a central core occupying about 10 per cent of the total mass is exhausted, there is an energy crisis. The core, now consisting of helium, contracts gravitationally, heating a surrounding hydrogen shell, which consequently ignites to form helium and gradually eats its way outwards (speaking in terms of the mass coordinate). At the same time, the envelope expands, making the star a red giant in the upper right part of the diagram. | ||
(4) | Eventually the contracting core becomes hot enough to ignite helium (3 -> 12C; 12C + 4He -> 16O) and the core contraction is halted. | ||
(5) | In sufficiently big stars (>~ 10M) this process repeats; successive stages of gravitational contraction and heating permit the ashes of the previous burning stage to be ignited leading to C, Ne, O and Si burning in the centre with less advanced burning stages in surrounding shells leading to an onion-like structure with hydrogen-rich material on the outside. Silicon burning leads to a core rich in iron-group elements and with a temperature of the order of 109 K, i.e. about 100 keV. | ||
(6) | The next stage of contraction is catastrophic, partly because all nuclear energy supplies have been used up when the iron group is reached, and partly because the core, having reached nearly the Chandrasekhar limiting mass for a white dwarf supported by electron degeneracy pressure, is close to instability and also suffers loss of pressure due to neutronization by inverse -decays. Further contraction leads to photodisintegration, which absorbs energy, and this leads to dynamical collapse of the core which continues until it reaches nuclear density and forms a neutron star. (If the mass of collapsing material is too large, then a black hole will probably form instead.) The stiff equation of state of nuclear matter leads to a bounce which sends a shock out into the surrounding layers. This heats them momentarily to high temperatures, maybe 5 x 109 K in the silicon layer, leading to explosive nucleosynthesis of iron-peak elements, mainly 56Ni (which later decays by electron capture and + to 56Fe); more external layers are heated to lower temperatures resulting in milder changes. Assisted by high-energy neutrinos, the shock expels the outer layers in a supernova explosion (Type II and related classes); the ejecta eventually feed the products into the ISM which thus becomes enriched in ``metals'' in course of time. This scenario was first put forward in essentials by Hoyle (1946), and modern versions give a fairly good fit to the local abundances of elements from oxygen to calcium. The iron yield is uncertain because it depends on the mass cut between expelled and infalling material in the silicon layer, but can be parameterized to fit observational data, e.g. for SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). The upshot is that iron-group elements are probably underproduced relative to local abundances, but the deficit is plausibly made up by contributions from supernovae of Type Ia. A subset of Type II supernovae may also be the site of the r-process (see Chapter 6). | ||
(7) | For intermediate mass stars (IMS), ~ 1M M ~ 8M, stages (i) to (iii) are much as before, bitt these never reach the stage of carbon burning because the carbon-oxygen core becomes degenerate first by virtue of high density, and later evolution is limited by extensive mass loss from the surface. After core helium exhaustion, these stars re-ascend the giant branch along the so-called asymptotic giant branch (AGB) track (see Fig. 5.14) with a double shell source: helium-burning outside the CO core and hydrogen-burning outside the He core. This is an unstable situation giving rise to thermal pulses or ``helium shell flashes'' in which the two sources alternately switch on and off driving inner and outer convection zones (in which mixing takes place) during their active phases (see Chapter 5). The helium-burning shell generates 12C and neutrons, either from 22Ne(, n)25Mg or from 13C(, n)16O, leading to s-processing, and the products are subsequently brought up to the surface in what is known as the third dredge-up process. This process leads to observable abundance anomalies in the spectra of AGB stars, carbon and S stars; see Figs. 1.7, 1.8). The products are then ejected into the ISM by mass loss in the form of stellar winds and planetary nebulae (PN), leaving a white dwarf as the final remnant. If the white dwarf is a member of a close binary system, it can occasionally be ``rejuvenated'' by accreting material from its companion. giving rise to cataclysmic variables, novae and supernovae of Type Ia (cf. Chapter 5). |