It is clear that we shall learn a great deal from more extensive X-ray
data on clusters
at very high redshifts. Also, quasars surveys have now discovered enough
objects to yield quantitative data on how quasars are clustered. There
is tantalizing evidence
that clustering exists, but does not depend steeply on redshift. The
rate of evolution
of clustering is a diagnostic for the cosmological density parameter,
and also for the
biasing factor. Clustering evolves more rapidly at later epochs, under
the action
of gravity, if is high. On the
other hand, if the objects being studied, galaxies
or quasars, are strongly biased in their distribution relative to the
mass, then the
apparent clustering will develop less dramatically with redshift.
There is a possibility of using quasars to study incipient clustering right back to redshifts of order 5. I should like, however, briefly to mention a technique that offers the chance of probing largescale structure at even higher redshifts, perhaps even before the first galaxies and quasars 'switched on' and reheated the primordial plasma. This technique depends on studying the 21cm line expected from diffuse neutral hydrogen. In terms of brightness temperature, this line contributes much less than the 2.7° which we get from the microwave background. Its temperature is also much less than the non-thermal radio background due to synchrotron emission from extragalactic sources. It may nonetheless be possible to pick out the 21cm contribution, because of its characteristic angular structure, combined with fine structure in frequency space. See Figure 6 and its caption. The contribution to the radio background temperature at 1420 MHz due to uniformly distributed hydrogen at redshift z is easily calculated to be
The factor f is unity if the spin temperature is much higher than
the radiation
temperature. If there had been no heat input into the primordial gas before the
relevant epoch, then the spin temperature would be lower than the
radiation temperature
and the intergalactic gas would show up in absorption. If a region lies along
our line-of-sight which has a higher density than average, or has an
expansion rate
slower than the mean Hubble flow, the contribution from the 21cm line would be
enhanced. For a linear fluctuation, the enhancement is five thirds the
amplitude of
the density perturbation, the extra two thirds coming from the reduced
expansion
rate in an overdense growing perturbation, which increases the hydrogen column
density per unit redshift interval.
If neutral hydrogen has largescale inhomogeneities, or its velocities
are perturbed
from the mean Hubble flow, there will therefore be spatial and spectral
structure in
the radio background we receive from it. Though small compared to the continuum
radio background, this may be detectable by difference measurements, switching
between nearby frequencies and directions. The expected fine structure
in frequency
space would allow the signal from non-uniform neutral hydrogen to be
distinguished
from patchiness in the non-thermal synchrotron background.
The most hopeful possibility for carrying out this kind of 'tomography'
on protoclusters
involves the proposed GMRT in India. This instrument is planned to
comprise an array of 34 dishes, each 45m in diameter. The dishes will
not be sufficiently
well-surfaced to be effective at high frequencies. However, the array will be
eight times more sensitive than the VLA at 327 MHz. It will also operate
at lower
frequencies in the range of 150-250 MHz, where the artificial background,
particularly at its proposed location, is particularly low. This
corresponds to redshifts
between 6 and 8.5. The sensitivity is such that protoclusters would be
detected, if
they have the properties predicted by some theories. Furthermore, the
precursors
of specially large systems resembling the Great Attractor or the Shapley
Concentration should reveal themselves in this way.