Next Contents Previous

1.4. The evolution of primordial magnetic fields

A crucial issue for the investigation of a possible primordial origin of present time galactic and intergalactic magnetic fields is that concerning the time evolution of the magnetic fields in the cosmic medium. Three conditions are needed for the persistence of large static fields:

a) intrinsic stability of the field;
b) the absence of free charges which could screen the field;
c) to have a small diffusion time of the field with respect to the age of the Universe.

Condition a) does not hold for strong electric fields. It is a firm prediction of QED that an electric field decays by converting its energy in electron-positron pairs if e |E| geq me2 [37, 38]. This, however, is a purely electric phenomenon. Although, at the end of the sixties, there was a claim that strong magnetic fields may decay through a similar phenomenon [39] the argument was proved to be incorrect. Only very strong fields may produce nontrivial instabilities in the QCD (if B > 1017 G) and the electroweak vacuum (if B > 1023 G) which may give rise to a partial screening of the field. These effects (see Chap. 5) may have some relevance for processes which occurred at very early times and, perhaps, for the physics of very peculiar collapsed objects like magnetars [40]. They are, however, irrelevant for the evolution of cosmic magnetic fields after BBN time. The same conclusion holds for finite temperature and densities effects which may induce screening of static magnetic fields (see e.g. Ref. [41]).

Condition b) is probably trivially fulfilled for magnetic fields due to the apparent absence of magnetic monopoles in nature. It is interesting to observe that even a small abundance of magnetic monopoles at present time would have dramatic consequences for the survival of galactic and intergalactic magnetic fields which would lose energy by accelerating the monopoles. This argument was first used by Parker [42] to put a severe constraint on the present time monopole flux, which is FM ltapprox 10-15 cm-2 s-1sr-1. It was recently proposed by Kephart and Weiler [43] that magnetic monopoles accelerated by galactic magnetic fields could give rise to the highest energy cosmic rays (E ltapprox 1019 eV) and explain the violation of the famous Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin cut-off [44].

Also the condition c) does not represent a too serious problem for the survival of primordial magnetic fields. The time evolution law of a magnetic field in a conducting medium has been already written in Eq. (1.5).

Neglecting fluid velocity this equation reduces to the diffusion equation which implies that an initial magnetic configuration will decay away in a time

Equation 1.17        (1.17)

where L is the characteristic length scale of the spatial variation of B. In a cosmological framework, this means that a magnetic configuration with coherence length L0 will survive until the present time t0 (t = 0 corresponds to the big-bang time) only if taudiff(L0) > t0. In our convention, L0 corresponds to the present time length scale determined by the Hubble law

Equation 1.18        (1.18)

where a(t) is the Universe scale factor and L(ti) is the length scale at the time at which the magnetic configuration was formed. Note that L0 may not coincide with the actual size of the magnetic configuration since other effects (see below) may come-in to change the comoving coherence length. As we see from Eq. (1.17) the relevant quantity controlling the decay time of a magnetic configuration is the electric conductivity of the medium. This quantity changes in time depending on the varying population of the available charge carriers and on their kinetics energies. However, since most of the Universe evolution takes place in a matter dominated regime, during which all charge carriers are non-relativistic, our estimate of the magnetic diffusion length is simpler. In general, electric conductivity can be determined by comparing Ohm law J = sigmaE with the electric current density definition J = n e v, where for simplicity we considered a single charge carrier type with charge e, number density n and velocity v. The mean drift velocity in the presence of the electric field E is v ~ eE tau / m where m is the charge carrier mass and tau is the average time between particle collisions. Therefore the general expression for the electron conductivity is (2)

Equation 1.19        (1.19)

After recombination of electron and ions into stable atoms Universe conductivity is dominated by residual free electrons. Their relative abundance is roughly determined by the value that this quantity took at the time when the rate of the reaction p + e H + gamma became smaller than the Universe expansion rate. In agreement with the results reported in Ref. [46], we use

Equation 1.20        (1.20)

where Omega0 is the present time density parameter and h is Hubble parameter. Electron resistivity is dominated by Thomson scattering off cosmic background photons. Therefore tau appeq 1 / ngamma sigmaT, where sigmaT = [(e4) / (6 pime2)] is the Thomson cross section, and ngamma = 4.2 × 102 (1 + z)3. Substituting these expressions in Eq. (1.19) we get

Equation 1.21        (1.21)

It is noticeable that after recombination time Universe conductivity is a constant. Finally, the cosmic diffusion length, i.e. the minimal size of a magnetic configuration which can survive diffusion during the Universe time-life t0, is found by substituting t0 = 2 × (Omega0 h2)-1/2 s-1 into Eq. (1.17) which, adopting Omega0 = 1 and h = 0.6, gives

Equation 1.22        (1.22)

It follows from this result that magnetic diffusion is negligible on galactic and cosmological scales.

The high conductivity of the cosmic medium has other relevant consequences for the evolution of magnetic fields. Indeed, as we already mentioned in the Introduction, the magnetic flux through any loop moving with fluid is a conserved quantity in the limit sigma rightarrow infty. More precisely, it follows from the diffusion equation (1.5) and few vector algebra operations (see Ref. [15]) that

Equation 1.23        (1.23)

where S is any surface delimited by the loop. On scale where diffusion can be neglected the field is said to be frozen-in, in the sense that lines of force move together with the fluid. Assuming that the Universe expands isotropically (3), and no other effects come-in, magnetic flux conservation implies

Equation 1.24        (1.24)

This will be one of the most relevant equations in our review. It should be noted by the reader that B(t) represents the local strength of the magnetic field obtained by disregarding any effect that may be produced by spatial variations in its intensity and direction. Eq. (1.24) is only slightly modified in the case the a uniform magnetic field produce a significative anisotropic component in the Universe expansion (see Sec. 2.1).

Another quantity which is almost conserved due to the high conductivity of the cosmic medium is the, so-called, magnetic helicity, defined by

Equation 1.25        (1.25)

Helicity is closely analogous to vorticity in fluid dynamics. In a field theory language, H can be identified with the Chern-Simon number which is known to be related to the topological properties of the field. Indeed, it is known from Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) that H is proportional to the sum of the number of links and twists of the magnetic field lines [47]. As it follows from Eq. (1.5), the time evolution of the magnetic helicity is determined by

Equation 1.26        (1.26)

As we shall show in Chap. 4, several models proposed to explain the origin of primordial magnetic fields predict these fields to have some relevant amount of helicity.

In the previous section we have already mentioned the important role played by magnetic helicity in some MHD dynamo mechanisms driving an instability of small scale magnetic fields into large scale fields. A similar effect may take place at a cosmological level leading to significative corrections to the simple scaling laws expressed by the Eqs. (1.18, 1.24). Generally, these kind of MHD effects occur in the presence of some, turbulent motion of the conductive medium (note that Eqs. (1.18, 1.24) has been derived under the assumption of vanishing velocity of the fluid v = 0). Hydrodynamic turbulence is generally parameterized in terms of the Reynolds number, defined by

Equation 1.27        (1.27)

where nu is the kinematic viscosity. Fluid motion is said to be turbulent if Re >> 1. In the presence of a magnetic field another parameter turns-out to be quite useful. This is the magnetic Reynolds number defined by

Equation 1.28        (1.28)

where eta = [1 / (4 pi sigma)]. When ReM >> 1 transport of the magnetic lines with the fluid dominates over diffusion. In this case hydrodynamic turbulence in a conducting medium give rise to magnetic turbulence. It is often assumed in MHD that a fully developed magnetic turbulence give rise to equipartion between the kinetic and the magnetic energy of the fluid. Whether equipartition hypothesis is valid or not is a controversial issue.

Both the hydrodynamic and magnetic Reynolds numbers can be very large in the early Universe. This is a consequence of the high electric conductivity and low viscosity of the medium and, especially, of the large scales which are involved. The electric conductivity of the early Universe has been computed by several authors. A first simple estimation of sigma in the radiation dominated era was performed by Turner and Widrow [45]. In terms of the resistivity eta their result is eta ~ alpha / T . A more exact series of calculations can be found in Ref. [48] which include logarithmic corrections due to Debye and dynamical screening. As a result a more correct expression for eta is

Equation 1.29        (1.29)

Other detailed computations of the Universe conductivity close to the QCD and the electroweak phase transitions are available in Refs. [49]. The kinematic viscosity follows the behavior [50]

Equation 1.30        (1.30)

In the early Universe nu >> eta, i.e. ReM >> Re. Concerning the absolute value of these parameters, using the previous expressions it is easy to verify that for a reasonable choice of the velocity field that may be produced by a phase transition, v ltapprox 10-3, both Re and ReM are much larger than unity by several orders of magnitude, even for very small scales (for more details see Chap. 4). It seems that the early Universe was a quite "turbulent child" ! Turbulence is expected to cease after e+ e- annihilation since this process reduces the plasma electron population and therefore increases the photon diffusion length hence also the kinematic viscosity. This should happen at a temperature around 1 MeV.

Turbulence is expected to produce substantial modification in the scaling laws of cosmological magnetic fields. This issue has been considered by several authors. Brandenburg, Enqvist and Olesen [51] first consider MHD in an expanding Universe in the presence of hydro-magnetic turbulence. MHD equations were written in a covariant form and solved numerically under some simplifying assumptions. The magnetic field was assumed to be distributed randomly either in two or three spatial dimensions. In the latter case a cascade (shell) model was used to reduce the number of degree of freedom. In both cases a transfer of magnetic energy from small to large magnetic configurations was observed in the simulations. In hydrodynamics this phenomenon is know as an inverse cascade. Cascade processes are know to be related to certain conservation properties that the basic equations obey [52]. In the two-dimensional inverse cascade, the relevant conserved quantity is the volume integral of the vector potential squared, integ d2 x A2, whereas in the three-dimensional cases it is the magnetic helicity. It was recently showed by Son [59] that no inverse cascade can develop in 3d if the mean value of H vanishes. If this is the case, i.e. in the presence of non-helical MHD turbulence, there is still an anomalous grow of the magnetic correlation length with respect to the scaling given in Eq. (1.18) but this is just an effect of a selective decay mechanism: modes with larger wavenumbers decay faster than those whose wavenumbers are smaller. Assuming Universe expansion is negligible with respect to the decay time, which is given by the eddy turnover time tauL ~ L / vL, and the decay of the large wavenumber modes does not affect those with smaller wavenumbers, Son found that the correlation length scale with time as

Equation 1.31        (1.31)

where taui = Li / vi is the eddy turnover time at t = 0. Assuming equipartition of the kinetic and magnetic energies, that is vL ~ BL, it follows that the energy decay with time like t-6/5. When the Universe expansion becomes not negligible, i.e. when t > t0, one has to take into account that the correlation length grows as tau2/5, where tau is the conformal time. Since tau ~ T-1, it follows the T-2/5 law. In the real situation, the final correlation length at the present epoch is,

Equation 1.32        (1.32)

In the above, the first factor comes from the growth of the correlation length in the time interval 0 < t < t0 when eddy decay is faster than Universe expansion; the second factor comes from the growth of L in the t > t0 period; the last factor comes from trivial redshift due to the expansion of the Universe. Tnt is the temperature of the Universe when the fluid becomes non-turbulent. As we discussed Tnt ~ 1 MeV. If, for example, we assume that turbulence was produced at the electroweak phase transition, so that Ti = TEW ~ 100 GeV, that vi ~ 0.1 and Li ~ 10-2 rH(TEW) ~ 10-2 cm, one find L0 ~ 100 AU. This result has to be compared with the scale one would have if the only mechanism of dissipation of magnetic energy is resistive diffusion which, as we got in Eq. (1.22) is ~ 1 AU.

A larger coherence length can be obtained by accounting for the magnetic helicity which is probably produced during a primordial phase transition. The conservation of H has an important consequence for the evolution of the magnetic field. When H is non-vanishing, the short-scale modes are not simply washed out during the decay: their magnetic helicity must be transferred to the long-scale ones. Along with the magnetic helicity, some magnetic energy is also saved from turbulent decay. In other words, an inverse cascade is taking place. Assuming maximal helicity, i.e. that B · (nabla × B) ~ L B2, the conservation of this quantity during the decay of turbulence implies the scaling law

Equation 1.32a

This corresponds to "line averaging", which gives a much larger amplitude of the magnetic field than the usual "volume averaging". Equipartition between magnetic and kinetic energy implies

Equation 1.32b

This relation together with the expression for the eddy decay time, tauL = L / vL, leads to the following scaling law for the correlation length of helical magnetic structures

Equation 1.33        (1.33)

Comparing this result with Eq. (1.31), we see that in the helical case the correlation length grow faster than it does in the turbulent non-helical case. The complete expression for the scaling of L is finally obtained by including trivial redshift into Eq. (1.33). Since in the radiation dominated era T -1 ~ a ~ t1/2, we have [50]

Equation 1.34        (1.34)

and

Equation 1.35        (1.35)

According to Son, [50] helical hydromagnetic turbulence survives longer than non-helical turbulence allowing Tnt to be as low as 100 eV. If again we assume that helical magnetic turbulence is generated at the electroweak phase transition (which will be justified in Chap. 4) we find

Equation 1.36        (1.36)

which is much larger than the result obtained in the non-helical case. It is worthwhile to observe that,as the scale derived in the previous expression is also considerably larger than the cosmological magnetic diffusion length scale given in Eq. (1.22), that magnetic field fields produced by the EW phase transition may indeed survive until present.



2 In the case the average collision time of the charge carrier is larger than the Universe age tauU, the latter has to be used in place of tau in Eq. 1.19 [45]. Back.

3 In the Sec. 2.1 we shall discuss under which hypothesis such an assumption is consistent with the presence of a cosmic magnetic field. Back.

Next Contents Previous