2.2. Cluster baryon count
Eq. (21) implies that for a cluster with an isothermal atmosphere
where Ne is the total number of electrons in the cluster. Thus for an isothermal cluster, a model-independent estimate of the total number of electrons in the cluster, and hence the total number of baryons, can be deduced if the temperature, Tgas, and metallicity of the cluster gas can be deduced from a good X-ray spectrum.
X-ray data for a cluster can also be used to calculate the cluster's total mass, Mtot, using the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium and spherical symmetry, eq. (23). If this mass estimate is combined with the baryonic mass, taken from Ne deduced from the SZ effect (or from the electron count deduced from the X-ray data), the baryonic mass fraction in the cluster gas, fb, can be found. Since the gas in clusters contains most of the baryons (stars and stellar remnants are a relatively small correction), the value of fb found in this way should be appropriate for the cluster as a whole (and should be a reliable lower limit). If, then, clusters of galaxies are fair samples of the mass content of the Universe, the derived value of fb should be close to the value 0.12 ± 0.02 (Turner 2002) for the Universe as a whole.
On the other hand, if clusters are not fair samples of the total matter content of the Universe, then the variation of fb as a function of redshift, derived by this technique, would be a powerful clue to the processes of cluster formation. At present there is no evidence for significant variations in the cluster-based fb with redshift (Carlstrom et al. 2002), but the errors on the values of fb are large.
Clearly this measurement can be made only if the calibration of the SZ effect is good (Sec. 2.1.1). The measurement also relies on assumptions (Sec. 2.2.1) about the gas distribution.
2.2.1. Isothermal spherical clusters
The key assumptions about cluster properties in finding the baryon count are
The resulting systematic errors in the gas temperature (and it is assumed that the electron and ion temperatures are the same: this is by no means assured) are probably only (1 - 2)% in the X-ray bright regions, so the appropriately-weighted systematic error in the gas temperature over the population of electrons and baryons is likely to be only ~ 4%. This is not a major issue.
The strong additional assumption that the cluster has a spherical, or almost spherical, shape is needed if the X-ray data are to be used to determine the total cluster mass and so to determine the cluster baryonic content. Projection effects that could affect the measurement for fb are a major worry in using this method for individual clusters: a preferable technique would be to apply it for clusters selected in a manner independent of their orientation (i.e., using clusters with surface brightnesses far above some X-ray threshold, or using clusters from a blind SZ effect survey). The individual measurements of fb would then be subject to projection effects, but the average fb can be extracted from the population if the intrinsic distribution of cluster atmosphere shapes can be recovered.
2.2.2. Large-scale model
The isothermal model of Cavaliere, Fusco-Femiano (1976) is a convenient and frequently-used description of the large-scale structure of the atmosphere of a cluster of galaxies. Its form can be derived from
(e.g., Fabricant, Lecar, Gorenstein 1980) which describes how the density, gas, and temperature, Tgas, of a gas in hydrostatic equilibrium in a spherically-symmetric gravitational potential well is related to the mass of the cluster, Mtot(r), within radius r. If we assume that the gas is isothermal, and that the total mass distribution has the form
where rc, the core radius, defines a characteristic scale and Mc is the mass within rc, then a consistent description of the density of the atmosphere is obtained with
where is a constant which determines the shape of the gas distribution, and depends on the ratio of a characteristic gravitational potential energy and the thermal energy in the gas
The alternative derivation of this isothermal model by Cavaliere, Fusco-Femiano (1976) brings out the interpretation of in terms of the relative scale heights of gas and dark matter in the potential well. Most uses of eq. (25) seek to determine 0, rc, and without considering the detailed properties of the underlying mass distribution.
It should be noted that the physical consistency of this much-used model for the gas distribution depends on radial symmetry (a simple distortion from a spherical to an elliptical model for the gas density would imply a mass distribution which is not necessarily positive everywhere), and on gas at different heights in the atmosphere having come to the same temperature without having necessarily followed the same thermal history. Eq. (25) is not unique in the sense that gas with a different thermal history might follow a significantly different density distribution. Thus, for example, if the gas has the same specific entropy at all heights, then the gas density should be described by
where is a structure constant with a similar meaning to .
A similar procedure for the mass profile of Navarro, Frenk White (1995), and an isothermal gas, leads to the gas density distribution
where the new structure constant
rs is the scale of the Navarro model and Ms is the mass within radius rs, so that has a similar physical meaning to . It can be seen that in this solution as r 0. Examples of eq. (25) and (28) profiles are shown in Fig. 12.
Figure 12. Representative isothermal models for cluster atmospheres. Solid line, eq. (28) with rs = 0.2r200 and = 10. Dashed line, eq (25) with rc = 0.1r200 and = 1.
The total masses for both mass distributions in Fig. 12 diverge as r , so both must be truncated at some outer radius. One possibility is to truncate at r200, the radius at which the mean enclosed mass density is 200 × the critical density of the Universe at the redshift at which the cluster is seen.
The run of density and temperature in a cluster atmosphere are usually measured from the X-ray image and spectrum, where a density model for the gas of the form of eq. (25) or eq. (28) is fitted to the X-ray surface brightness. The X-ray surface brightness at a point offset by r in projected distance from the centre of the gas distribution (assumed spherical) is (in energy per unit time per unit solid angle per unit frequency)
where (Tgas) is the X-ray emissivity of the gas. For an isothermal gas with a -model density distribution
if the density distribution of eq. (25) is taken to extend to infinity, with a constant gas temperature throughout.
This cannot be a fully physically-consistent description of the atmosphere: it is clearly too simple, as would be the corresponding result for the density distribution of eq. (28). Both involve infinite total masses, so an outer cut-off radius (not consistently modelled) is adopted, and eq. (28) also requires an inner cutoff radius. The choice of an isothermal description for the gas is also questionable: what process forces the temperature to become constant, when the gas is accumulated at a number of times from a number of sources (for example, infall and galactic winds), and is imperfectly mixed by galaxy motions or intracluster turbulence?
However, some large-scale gas model like eq. (25) or (28) is essential to relate the X-ray and SZ effects of clusters since X-ray and SZ measurements are sensitive to different parts of the gas distribution. These models also provide a convenient relationship between the atmosphere and the underlying mass distribution. Note that eq. (25) and eq. (28) generally require that the gas constitutes a radially-varying fraction of the total cluster mass.