3.5.3. The Void in Bootes
Identification of very large scale voids can be an ambiguous process.
In 1981, Kirshner et al. claimed to have detected a void of unprecedented
proportion. This claim was based on the results of 3 pencil beam
redshift surveys that were each separated by 35 degrees. In all three
fields there was a gap in the redshift distribution at velocities
15,000 km s-1. A
followup redshift survey by Kirshner et al. (1987)
of 240 bright galaxies in the region between these three fields revealed
that none had a redshift between
12,000 - 19,000 km
s-1. A uniform
distribution of galaxies would predict that 31 out of 240 should have
redshifts in this range. This region of space is in the constellation
Bootes and the redshift gap is known as the Bootes void. The overall
size scale of this, the first discovered large void, was
7500
km s-1, significantly larger than the typical void size seen
in the Slice
surveys. The question then became, is the Bootes void the largest
void there is?
The announcement of a large hole in space issued a challenge to many
observers to work extra hard to fill it in. This challenge was met
by a variety of workers who probed the void with objective prism surveys
to search for emission line galaxies. This region of space was also
well surveyed by the IRAS satellite. IRAS measures the integrated dust
emission, which is heated by the ambient interstellar radiation field,
of galaxies as it peaks in the 20 - 100 micron range of the electromagnetic
spectrum. The total amount of energy contained in this emission can
be quite large (and in some galaxies it comprises more than 90% of the
total energy released) and thus IRAS can detect galaxies out to relatively
large distances. Greg Aldering and collaborators have extensively analyzed
the IRAS data that is available in the Bootes void area. After many
years of investigation, Aldering et al. (1997) have now discovered 53
galaxies within the boundaries of this void as defined by Kirshner et al.
(1987). With these data, Aldering et al. have redefined the density profile
in the Bootes void and have now shown that the overall characteristics of
the void are quite typical of those seen in the Slice surveys. Hence,
if larger scale voids than those seen in the CFA Slice exist, they
have not been detected yet. This is consistent with the most recent
results of the Las Campanas Redshift Survey (LCRS) of the southern
survey. The LCRS goes deeper than the CFA surveys to date and the largest
void seen in that survey has a diameter of
6000 km s-1
(Da Costa et al. 1996).
Figure 3-12 shows some of the results of the
LCRS and the by now familiar pattern of walls and voids.