![]() ![]() © CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1999
| |
1.4.6 Cluster Morphology and Evolution
Cluster Morphology.
Richstone, Loeb,
and Turner (1992)
showed that clusters are expected
to be evolved - i.e. rather spherical and featureless - in
low- cosmologies, in which
structures form at relatively high
redshift, and that clusters should be more irregular in
= 1
cosmologies, where they have formed relatively recently and are still
undergoing significant merger activity. There are few known
clusters that seem to be highly evolved and relaxed, and many that
are irregular - some of which are obviously undergoing mergers now
or have recently done so (see e.g.
Burns et al. 1994).
This disfavors
low-
models, but it remains to
be seen just how low. Recent papers have addressed this. In one
(Mohr et al. 1995)
a total of 24
CDM simulations with
= 1 or
0.2, the latter with
= 0 or 0.8, were compared
with data on a sample of 57
clusters. The conclusion was that clusters with the observed range of
X-ray morphologies are very unlikely in the
low-
cosmologies.
However, these simulations have been criticized because the
0 = 0.2 ones
included rather a large amount of ordinary matter:
b = 0.1. (This is
unrealistic both because h
0.8 provides the best fit for
0 = 0.2 CDM, but then the standard
BBN upper limit is
b
< 0.02h2 = 0.03; and also because
observed clusters have a gas fraction of ~ 0.15(h /
0.5)-3/2.) Another study
(Jing et al. 1995)
using dissipationless simulations and
not comparing directly to observational data found that
CDM
with
0 = 0.3 and
h = 0.75 produced clusters with some
substructure, perhaps enough to be observationally acceptable (cf.
Buote & Xu 1997).
Clearly, this important issue deserves study with higher resolution
hydrodynamic simulations, with a range of assumed
b, and
possibly including at least some of the additional physics associated
with the galaxies which must produce the metallicity observed in
clusters, and perhaps some of the heat as well. Better statistics for
comparing simulations to data may also be useful
(Buote & Tsai 1996).
Cluster Evolution. There is evidence on the evolution
of clusters at relatively low redshift, both in their X-ray properties
(Henry et al. 1992,
Castander et
al. 1995,
Ebeling et al. 1995)
and in the properties of their galaxies. In particular, there is a strong
increase in the fraction of blue galaxies with increasing redshift
(the ``Butcher-Oemler effect''), which may be difficult to explain in
a low-density universe
(Kauffmann 1995).
Field galaxies do not appear
to show such strong evolution; indeed, a recent study concludes that
over the redshift range 0.2
z
1.0 there is no significant
evolution in the number density of ``normal'' galaxies
(Steidel,
Dickinson, & Persson 1994).
This is compatible with the predictions
of various models, including CHDM with two neutrinos sharing a total
mass of about 5 eV (see below), but the dependence of the number of
clusters on redshift can be a useful constraint on theories
(Jing & Fang 1994,
Bryan et al. 1994,
Walter & Klypin 1996,
Eke, Cole & Frenk
1996).