2.1. Weak Equilibrium and the he Abundance
Consider now those early epochs when the Universe was only a few tenths 
of a second old and the radiation filling it was at a temperature (thermal 
energy) of a few MeV.  According to the standard model, at those early 
times the Universe was a hot, dense ``soup'' of relativistic particles 
(photons, e± pairs, 3 ``flavors'' (e, µ,
) of 
neutrino-antineutrino pairs) along with a trace amount (at the level 
of a few parts in 1010) of neutrons and protons.  At such high 
temperatures and densities both the weak and nuclear reaction rates 
are sufficiently rapid (compared to the early Universe expansion rate) 
that all particles have come to equilibrium.  A key consequence of 
equilibrium is that the earlier history of the evolution of the Universe 
is irrelevant for an understanding of BBN.  When the temperature drops 
below a few MeV the weakly interacting neutrinos effectively decouple 
from the photons and e± pairs, but they still play an
important role in regulating the neutron-to-proton ratio.  
At high temperatures, neutrons and protons are continuously interconverting 
via the weak interactions: n + e+ <-> p
+ 
e, n +
e <-> p +
e-, and n <-> p + e- +
e. When the
interconversion rate is faster than the expansion 
rate, the neutron-to-proton ratio tracks its equilibrium value, decreasing 
exponentially with temperature (n / p = e-
m / T, where
m = 1.29 MeV is the
neutron-proton mass difference).  A comparison of the weak 
rates with the universal expansion rate reveals that equilibrium may be 
maintained until the temperature drops below ~ 0.8 MeV.  When the 
interconversion rate becomes less than the expansion rate, the n/p ratio
effectively ``freezes-out'' (at a value of
 1/6), thereafter 
decreasing slowly, mainly due to free neutron decay. 
Although n/p freeze-out occurs at a temperature below the deuterium
binding energy, EB = 2.2 MeV, the first link in the
nucleosynthetic chain, p + n -> D +
, is ineffective
in jump-starting BBN since the photodestruction rate of deuterium
(
n
e-EB / T) is much larger than the deuterium
production rate (
nB) due to the very large universal photon-to-baryon
ratio (
 109).  
Thus, the Universe must ``wait'' until there are so few sufficiently
energetic photons that deuterium becomes effectively stable against 
photodissociation.  This occurs for temperatures
 80 keV, at which 
time neutrons are rapidly incorporated into he with an efficiency of 
99.99%. This efficiency is driven by the tight binding of the 4He 
nucleus, along with the roadblock to further nucleosynthesis imposed 
by the absence of a stable nucleus at mass-5.  By this time (T
 80 keV), the n/p
ratio has dropped to ~ 1/7, and simple counting 
(2 neutrons in every 4He nucleus) yields an estimated
primordial 4He mass fraction
 
As a result of its large binding energy and the gap at mass-5, the 
primordial abundance of 4He is relatively insensitive to the
nuclear reaction rates and, therefore, to the baryon abundance
( 
 Figure 2. The predicted 4He
 abundance (solid curve) and the 2 
The 4He abundance is, however, sensitive to the competition between 
the universal expansion rate (H) and the weak interaction rate 
(interconverting neutrons and protons).  If the early Universe should 
expand faster than predicted for the standard model, the weak interactions 
will drop out of equilibrium earlier, at a higher temperature, when the 
n/p ratio is higher.  In this case, more neutrons will be available to 
be incorporated into 4He and YP will increase.
Numerical calculations show that for a modest speed-up
( 
It should be noted that the uncertainty in the BBN-predicted mass 
fraction of 4He is very small and almost entirely dominated by the 
(small) uncertainty in the n - p interconversion rates.  These rates 
may be ``normalized'' through the neutron lifetime,
).  As 
may be seen in Figure 1, while
varies by orders of magnitude, the predicted 4He mass
fraction, YP, changes by factors of only a few.  
Indeed, for 1 
10
 10, 0.22
 YP
 0.25.
As may be seen in Figures 1 and
2, there is a very slight increase in YP
with 
.
This is mainly due to BBN beginning earlier, when there are
more neutrons available to form 4He, if the baryon-to-photon
ratio is higher.  The increase in YP with
 is logarithmic; over
most of the interesting range in
,
YP
 0.01

 / 
.
  
  
 theoretical uncertainty
 [3]. The
 horizontal lines show the 
 range indicated by the observational data.
N
 1),
YP
 0.013
N
. Hence, constraints on YP
(and 
) 
lead directly to bounds on
N
 and, on particle physics 
beyond the standard model
[1].  
n, whose 
current standard value is 887 ± 2 s (actually, 886.7 ± 1.9 s).  
To very good accuracy, a 1 s uncertainty in
n
corresponds to an uncertainty in YP of order 2 x
10-4.  At this tiny 
level of uncertainty it is important to include finite mass, zero- and 
finite-temperature radiative corrections, and Coulomb corrections to 
the weak rates.  However, within the last few years it emerged that 
the largest error in the BBN-prediction of YP was due to a too large
time-step in the numerical code.  With this now under control, it is
estimated that the residual theoretical uncertainty (in addition to
that from the uncertainty in
n) is of the order of 2 parts 
in 104.  Indeed, a comparison of two major, independent BBN codes 
reveals agreement in the predicted values of YP to 0.0001
± 0.0001 over the entire range 1
10
 10.  In
Figure 2 is 
shown the BBN-predicted he mass fraction, YP, as a function of 
; the thickness of
the band is the ±2
 theoretical 
uncertainty.  For
10
 2 the
1
 theoretical uncertainty in
Yp is 
 6 x
10-4.  As we will soon see, the current 
observational uncertainties in YP are much larger (see, also,
Fig. 2).