3.2. TRGB distance
The use of Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) as a standard candle is now a widely used technique to estimate the distance to galaxies of any morphological type (see Madore & Freedman, 1998; Lee, Freedman & Madore, 1993; Walker, 2003; Madore & Freedman, 1995, for a detailed description of the method, recent reviews and applications). The underlying physics is well understood (Salaris, Cassisi & Weiss, 2002; Madore & Freedman, 1998) and the observational procedure is operationally well defined (Madore & Freedman, 1995). The key observable is the sharp cut-off occurring at the bright end of the RGB Luminosity Function (LF) that can be easily detected with the application of an edge-detector filter (Sobel filter, Sakai, Madore & Freedman, 1996; Madore & Freedman, 1995) or by other (generally parametric) techniques (see, for example McConnachie et al., 2004; Méndez et al., 2002). The necessary condition for a safe application of the technique is that the observed RGB Luminosity Function should be well populated, with more than ~ 100 stars within 1 mag from the TRGB (Bellazzini et al., 2002; Madore & Freedman, 1995).
The F2 sample is not sufficiently populated for a safe application of the
method while the F1 sample clearly fulfils the above criterion (there are
more than 2500
RGB stars within 1 mag from the TRGB), hence we limit the TRGB research
to F1. As a first step, to limit the range of metallicity of
the stars involved in the TRGB detection, we select RGB stars by color
following the approach adopted by
McConnachie et
al. (2004).
The adopted selection includes
the main bulk of the RGB population and it is shown
in the lower left panel of Fig. 4. The
logarithmic LF is presented as an ordinary
histogram and as a generalized histogram (e.g. the histogram
convolved with a Gaussian with standard deviation equal to the photometric
error at the given magnitude, see
Laird et al., 1988;
Bellazzini et al.,
2002,
for definitions and references) in the upper left and upper right panels
of Fig. 4,
respectively. The sharp cut-off is an obvious feature of both
representations of the LF and is easily detected by the Sobel filter
(Fig. 4, lower right
panel). As usual, the peak of the filter response is taken as the best
estimate of the TRGB location and the Half Width at Half Maximum of the
same peak is taken as the associated uncertainty,
ITRGB = 20.72 ± 0.08. If we consider the most
recent estimates in the literature, our value is
~ 2.2 larger than
that found by
McConnachie et al.
(2004,
ITRGB = 20.54 ± 0.01; but these authors provide only
a formal error on their estimate), and
~ 1 - 2
lower than the
estimates by
Kim et al. (2002,
ITRGB = 20.82 - 20.92 ± 0.05 depending on the
considered field), e.g. it is bracketed by the two quoted results.
On the other hand our estimate is in excellent agreement with that
obtained by T04 (ITRGB = 20.75 ± 0.02).
We adopt
E(B - V) = 0.04, according to the reddening maps by
Schlegel et
al. (1998) and
Burstein & Heiles
(1984)
and
AI = 1.76E(B - V), according to
Dean, Warren &
Cousins (1978).
We note however that most of the other available estimates of the
foreground reddening cluster around
E(B - V) = 0.08 (see
Van den Bergh, 1991,
and references therein). To account for
this, we report also the results we obtain adopting
E(B - V) = 0.08 (see Table 2,
below). Note that the effects of this different assumption are small
either on the final distance modulus (e.g. 0.05 mag) or the average
metallicity ( 0.15 dex; see
Tab. 2). According to the detailed dust maps of M 33 by
Hippelein et
al. (2003)
the effect of the intrinsic extinction should be negligible in the fields
considered here.
In Bellazzini, Ferraro
& Pancino (2001)
we have provided a robust zero-point to the calibrating relation
providing the absolute I magnitude of the tip
(MITRGB) as a function of
metallicity ([Fe / H], in the
Zinn & West (1984)
scale, hereafter ZW), based on the geometric distance to the cluster
Centauri obtained by
Thompson et al. (2001)
using the double-lined detached eclipsing binary OGLE-17. This
calibration is fully independent of the usual (Cepheid based and/or RR
Lyrae based) distance scales. In
Bellazzini et
al. (2004)
we have extended the calibration to Near Infrared
passbands and we refined our I calibration providing also the relation for
MITRGB as a function of the global
metallicity ([M/H], see
Salaris, Chieffi &
Straniero (1993) and
Ferraro et al. (1999)
for definitions and discussion) that we adopt in the present analysis.
Since the distance modulus derived from ITRGB is weakly dependent on metallicity, and our metallicity estimates (obtained by comparison with template RGB ridge lines, see below) depend on the assumed distance modulus, we adopted an iterative method to find simultaneously the two quantities searched for. First we derived a preliminary distance modulus adopting MITRGB = - 4.04, then we derived a median metallicity of the considered population as described in Sect. 3.3 below, and we obtained a refined estimate of the modulus using the obtained median metallicity ([M / H] = - 0.75, see below) as an input for the calibrating relation by Bellazzini et al. (2004):
![]() |
(1) |
The process converged to stable values of the distance modulus and of the median metallicity in 2-3 iterations, independently of the assumed reddening and/or the considered metallicity scale. Our final estimate (for E(B - V) = 0.04 and [M / H]med = - 0.75) is (m - M)0 = 24.64 ± 0.15, where all the sources of uncertainty have been taken into account. The corresponding distance estimate is D = 847 ± 60 Kpc.