Next Contents Previous

2.2. Sample Selection

2.2.1. Available Ground- and Space-based Observations

In selecting our galaxy sample we aimed to take advantage of as much pre-existing ground- and space-based UV, optical and near-IR images as possible. In particular, high priority was given to galaxies that have been observed with UIT in the far-UV (1500Å) and obeyed the SB and size criteria (Section 2.1.2 and Section 2.1.3). Some of these galaxies are close to the UIT detection limit, as they are minor members in galaxy groups targeted by UIT.

Also, nearby galaxies already observed with HST/WFPC2 in the mid-UV F300W and/or F255W filter that match our criteria will be included in our final sample. When the final Cycle 9 target list was compiled in early 2000, the HST Archive contained 15 such galaxies with F300W images obtained and two more imaged in F255W. These Archival observations came primarily from Cycle 4 program GO 5381 (PI: Koratkar) and Cycle 6 program GO 6355 (PI: Giavalisco). We will analyze these 17 Archival mid-UV images in a separate paper (Taylor et al. 2002, in preparation). The current Cycle 9 sample is designed and must be understood to be complementary to this existing Archival sample.

Over the last decade, several of us have systematically imaged from the ground a total of about 750 nearby galaxies covering all Hubble types and inclinations. The majority of these galaxies - which includes most of the galaxies imaged in the far-UV with UIT (primarily at 1500Å) - were observed in UBVRI, but a good fraction was observed in the near-IR JHK filters as well (Eskridge et al. 2002b). The data base thus compiled consists of seven individual galaxy samples:

(1) 86 face-on spiral galaxies of de Jong & van der Kruit (1994);

(2) 220 galaxies with Hubble types later than S0 from the OSU BVRJHK survey (Frogel et al. 1996; Eskridge et al. 2000, 2002b) (all inclinations);

(3) 113 galaxies from the Frei et al. (1996) survey in B and R, to which we added U and V-band images (good number of early-type galaxies; all inclinations; Taylor et al. 2002; in prep.);

(4) 100 galaxies with 1500Å and 40 with 2500Å images from the Astro/UIT mission (Kuchinski et al. 2000; Marcum et al. 2001) (all inclinations);

(5) 48 edge-on galaxies (de Grijs & Peletier 1997; de Grijs, Peletier, & van der Kruit, 1997);

(6) 150 late-type UGC galaxies selected to be morphologically irregular, peculiar, or merging (Hibbard & Vacca 1997; Hibbard et al. 2002). These have a range of impact parameters (i.e., the distance between the two interacting or colliding objects); and

(7) 49 late-type dwarf spiral galaxies (Matthews & Gallagher 1997) and compact, high-SB luminous blue galaxies (Gallagher et al. 1989, 2001) (all inclinations).

with some overlap among the samples. The last two sets were specifically added to provide a good number of likely local counterparts of the peculiar and irregular galaxies seen with HST in large numbers at high redshifts. The UBVRI + JHK images from these ground-based surveys, where available, are included in the data presented in Section 3 (Fig. 4).

2.2.2. Required Statistics

To date, the HST Archive contains over 10,000 orbits of data on a multitude of distant galaxy projects (including parallels). To match these numerous observations of distant galaxies, we need a statistically significant and representative comparison sample of nearby galaxies that includes all morphological types. To cover a broad range of nearby galaxies, we will use three broad bins of Hubble types: (1) early-type galaxies (E-S0), (2) early-mid type spiral galaxies (Sa-Sc), and (3) late-type galaxies, irregulars (Sd-Irr), plus peculiars and mergers. For statistical studies as a function of photometric parameters, we will cover a range in inclination angles in three bins of sini: edge-on, face-on, and intermediate angles. Thus, we need about 54 galaxies in total, to populate each of the nine type-inclination bins with 6 galaxies to begin to average over galaxy properties.

Of the 20 galaxies with WFPC2 F300W images in the Archive as of early 2000 (mostly E/S0/Sabc's), about 17 are small enough to be contained within the WFPC2 FOV. To this available mid-UV sample we add here a complementary set of 37 galaxies, which we selected from the ground-based samples of about 750 galaxies described in section 2.2.1. These objects comprise 24 new irregulars, peculiars, and merging/interacting galaxies, and 13 new E/S0/Sabc's to complement the 17 usable galaxies available in the HST Archive.

2.2.3. Selection of the HST/WFPC2 Mid-UV Sample

The selection criteria for inclusion in the HST/WFPC2 sample of 37 galaxies are:

(a) the B-band half-light radius should fall within the range 0.'1 ltapprox re ltapprox 1.'0;

(b) the predicted average SB in F300W out to r appeq re should be in the range 18 ltapprox µF300W ltapprox 22.5-23.0 mag arcsec - 2;

(c) the distribution of Hubble types should be representative for nearby galaxy samples when combined with the set of archival galaxies;

(d) the distribution over apparent axis ratio (and hence inclination) should resemble that of nearby galaxy samples;

(e) priority should be given, first, to the 15 galaxies with available UIT 1500Å images that obey the other selection criteria above, and then to galaxies with multi-band ground-based images available;

(f) as much as possible, select galaxies that are schedulable in the HST CVZ, while satisfying (a) - (e). Replace candidates that are difficult to schedule by alternates.

In Table 1 we list the properties of the selected sample. Most of the table entries are taken or derived from values listed in the RC3 catalogue (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991). Cols. 2 and 3 list the coordinates of the galaxy centers as measured on the Digital Sky Survey (DSS). In a few cases of complex galaxies, merging/interacting galaxies, or galaxies in small groups, the listed coordinates refer to a "center of mass" position, allowing optimal centering inside the WFPC2 FOV. Col. 4 shows the apparent axis ratio of the minor and major axis isophotal diameter measured at the µB = 25.0 mag arcsec - 2 isophote. The half-light radius, re and the radius at the µB = 25.0 mag arcsec - 2 isophote, r25, are listed in Cols. 5 and 6, respectively; the predicted average SB in F300W out to re and r25, and the predicted total F300W magnitude (see section 2.2) are tabulated in Cols. 7, 8, and 12. Col. 13 lists the revised T-type (numeric morphological type on the 16-step de Vaucouleurs scale). The redshifts in Col. 14 are given with respect to the Galactic Standard of Rest. Col. 15 lists for each galaxy the physical image scale in pc/(") at the distance of the galaxy, assuming a Hubble constant H0 = 67 km s - 1 Mpc - 1. And Col. 16 gives the physical size of a single WFC CCD-frame at that redshift. For the typical redshift range, z appeq 0.004-0.02 (i.e., Virgo-Coma cluster like distances), a single WFPC2 CCD covers 6.8-34 kpc.

Table 1. Nearby galaxies imaged with WFPC2 in the mid-UV in Cycle 9 a

Galaxy RA (J2000) DEC b/a re r25 SBeU300 SBr25U300 U-B B-V B U300 T z Scale kpc
        (') (') (mag/arcsec2) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag)     (pc / ") / FOV
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16)

--- Cycle 9 WFPC2 mid-UV Sample:
NGC 1140 02:54:33.43 -10:01:42.4 0.55 0.144 0.830 18.29 21.34 -0.43 0.35 12.84 12.26 10.0 0.0049 106. 7.95
ESO 418-G008 03:31:30.58 -30:12:46.6 0.66 0.185 0.587 20.61 22.37 -0.23 0.41 13.92 13.84 8.0 0.0038 82.4 6.18
NGC 1396 03:38:06.63 -35:26:24.5 0.10 0.172 0.500 21.19 22.75 0.53 ... 14.80 16.62 -3.0 0.0026 56.4 4.23
NGC 1510 04:03:32.55 -43:24:03.0 0.55 0.151 0.659 19.62 22.07 -0.19 0.45 13.47 13.49 -2.3 0.0028 60.7 4.55
ESO 033-G022 05:31:41.58 -73:45:04.2 0.06 0.248 1.021 19.92 22.24 -0.30 ... 15.37 15.12 7.0 0.0138 299. 22.4
UGC 03426 (Mrk 3) 06:15:36.33 +71:02:13.8 0.87 0.085 0.910 20.36 24.76 0.18 1.06 14.03 14.98 -2.0 0.0138 299. 22.4
IC 2184 (Mrk 8) 07:29:25.31 +72:07:39.8 0.78 0.159 0.416 19.17 20.51 -0.58 ... 13.50 12.55 9.0 0.0124 269. 20.2
NGC 2551 08:24:50.16 +73:24:43.0 0.68 0.220 0.830 21.75 23.88 0.39 0.99 13.10 14.57 0.2 0.0080 174. 13.1
UGC 05028/29 (Arp 300) 09:27:56.94 +68:24:56.9 0.58 0.150 0.354 21.32 22.44 0.14 ... 14.30 15.15 4.0 0.0127 276. 20.7
UGC 05101 09:35:51.45 +61:21:10.5 0.59 0.183 0.574 20.10 21.83 -0.89 ... 15.20 13.47 11.0 0.0401 870. 65.3
UGC 05189 09:42:55.27 +09:28:47.9 0.52 0.226 0.869 20.22 22.39 -0.73 ... 14.60 13.27 10.0 0.0102 221. 16.6
UGC 05626 10:24:27.76 +57:23:31.1 0.37 0.215 0.792 20.04 22.12 -0.73 ... 14.90 13.57 10.0 0.0088 191. 14.3
NGC 3310 (Arp 217) 10:38:45.99 +53:30:10.1 0.78 0.204 1.545 17.74 21.38 -0.43 0.35 11.15 10.57 4.0 0.0035 75.9 5.69
MCG+06-24-047 11:05:08.87 +38:04:08.7 0.07 0.143 0.301 17.45 18.31 -0.89 ... 15.40 13.67 11.0 0.0292 633. 47.5
NGC 3516 11:06:47.48 +72:34:06.7 0.78 0.190 0.869 19.86 22.41 -0.06 0.81 12.50 12.85 -2.0 0.0092 200. 15.0
NGC 3690/IC 694 (Arp 299) 11:28:31.49 +58:33:45.9 0.83 0.185 0.587 17.87 19.62 -0.58 ... 11.80 10.85 9.0 0.0107 232. 17.4
UGC 06527 (Arp 322) 11:32:42.24 +52:56:42.9 0.78 0.143 0.301 20.47 21.33 -0.89 ... 15.80 14.07 11.0 0.0273 592. 44.4
UGC 06697 11:43:48.86 +19:58:06.1 0.17 0.288 0.931 20.04 21.83 -0.32 0.49 14.08 13.78 10.0 0.0223 484. 36.3
MCG+03-30-071 11:44:01.88 +19:47:23.7 0.34 0.162 0.435 21.42 22.82 -0.15 0.53 15.54 15.66 10.0 0.0163 354. 26.6
NGC 3860B 11:44:47.27 +19:46:05.3 1.00 0.134 0.245 22.02 22.58 -0.12 0.52 15.30 15.50 10.0 0.0212 460. 34.5
NGC 3921 (Arp 224) 11:51:06.78 +55:04:44.4 0.62 0.362 1.069 22.34 23.94 0.25 0.68 13.06 14.18 0.0 0.0198 430. 32.3
NGC 4478 12:30:17.33 +12:19:41.7 0.85 0.223 0.953 21.46 23.86 0.46 0.91 12.36 14.01 -5.0 0.0044 95.4 7.16
IC 3949 12:58:52.29 +27:49:21.6 0.19 0.174 0.512 21.41 23.00 0.21 0.84 15.10 16.12 -2.0 0.0249 540. 40.5
UGC 08335 (Arp 238) 13:15:32.91 +62:07:36.6 0.89 0.167 0.467 22.47 23.95 0.04 ... 15.00 15.60 4.0 0.0312 677. 50.8
Mrk 66 13:25:53.68 +57:15:16.4 0.65 0.130 0.218 19.84 20.21 -0.66 0.02 15.00 13.85 11.0 0.0221 479. 35.9
NGC 5253 13:39:55.76 -31:38:38.5 0.39 0.379 2.506 18.52 21.88 -0.24 0.43 10.87 10.77 10.0 0.0009 19.5 1.46
NGC 5278/79 (Arp 239) 13:41:39.96 +55:40:12.4 0.71 0.197 0.674 21.43 23.35 0.14 ... 13.60 14.45 3.0 0.0255 553. 41.5
UGC 08696 (Mrk 273) 13:44:42.29 +55:53:11.1 0.23 0.183 0.574 18.95 20.68 -0.89 ... 15.07 13.34 11.0 0.0380 824. 61.8
UGC 08823 (Mrk 279) 13:53:03.55 +69:18:30.3 0.59 0.162 0.435 22.65 24.05 0.49 ... 14.57 16.29 -2.0 0.0311 675. 50.6
IC 4393 14:17:49.07 -31:20:55.5 0.11 0.275 1.199 20.28 22.73 -0.18 ... 14.55 14.60 6.0 0.0087 189. 14.2
UGC 09855 15:25:04.62 +66:15:15.8 0.33 0.210 0.757 19.77 21.80 -0.73 ... 14.80 13.47 10.0 0.0122 265. 19.9
UGC 10043 15:48:41.22 +21:52:10.1 0.15 0.275 1.199 21.42 23.87 0.04 ... 14.80 15.40 4.0 0.0075 163. 12.2
NGC 6753 19:11:23.75 -57:02:57.7 0.87 0.406 1.227 21.57 23.22 0.13 0.83 11.97 12.79 3.0 0.0103 223. 16.7
NGC 6789 19:16:41.93 +63:58:20.8 0.78 0.193 0.644 19.42 21.28 -0.73 ... 13.70 12.37 10.0 0.0005 10.8 0.81
NGC 6782 19:23:57.96 -59:55:21.6 0.66 0.354 1.094 21.32 23.02 0.32 0.92 11.84 13.14 0.8 0.0127 276. 20.7
NGC 7685 23:30:33.35 +03:54:08.4 0.76 0.489 0.931 23.37 24.02 0.00 0.66 13.84 14.34 5.3 0.0193 419. 31.4
NGC 7769 (Mrk 9005) 23:51:03.96 +20:09:00.0 0.95 0.220 0.830 21.16 23.29 0.14 ... 12.77 13.62 3.0 0.0146 317. 23.8
--- Archival WFPC2 mid-UV Sample:
NGC 0221 00:42:41.90 +40:51:55.0 0.76 0.601 4.355 20.21 23.76 0.48 0.95 9.03 10.73 -6.0 -0.0001 3.76 .282
NGC 1326 03:23:56.40 -36:27:50.0 0.65 0.416 1.945 21.12 23.72 0.28 0.87 11.41 12.61 -1.0 0.0041 88.9 6.67
NGC 1380 03:36:26.90 -34:58:33.0 0.66 0.659 2.393 22.02 24.07 0.45 0.94 10.87 12.49 -2.0 0.0057 124. 9.30
NGC 1507 04:04:27.30 -02:11:17.0 0.08 0.512 1.815 19.90 21.90 -0.07 0.57 12.89 13.21 9.0 0.0027 58.6 4.40
NGC 2798 09:17:22.90 +42:00:02.0 1.00 0.199 1.285 20.89 24.19 -0.01 0.72 13.04 13.51 1.0 0.0058 126. 9.45
NGC 3448 10:54:39.10 +54:18:24.0 0.76 0.388 2.812 21.03 24.59 -0.19 0.43 12.48 12.50 90.0 0.0047 102. 7.65
NGC 3516 11:06:47.30 +72:34:12.0 0.89 0.190 0.869 20.00 22.55 -0.06 0.81 12.50 12.85 -2.0 0.0092 200. 15.0
NGC 4278 12:20:07.20 +29:16:47.0 0.45 0.574 2.037 21.53 23.53 0.45 0.93 11.09 12.71 -5.0 0.0022 47.7 3.58
NGC 4425 12:27:13.40 +12:44:09.0 0.96 0.379 1.476 22.94 25.14 0.39 0.90 12.73 14.20 -1.0 0.0061 132. 9.90
NGC 4476 12:29:58.70 +12:20:53.0 0.50 0.301 0.849 21.71 23.21 0.27 0.82 13.01 14.18 -3.0 0.0062 134. 10.1
NGC 4564 12:36:27.00 +11:26:21.0 0.36 0.330 1.774 21.07 23.97 0.46 0.93 12.05 13.70 -5.0 0.0036 78.1 5.86
NGC 4639 12:42:52.60 +13:15:30.0 0.78 0.489 1.377 22.00 23.50 0.08 0.70 12.24 12.94 4.0 0.0032 69.4 5.21
NGC 4772 12:53:29.10 +02:10:11.0 0.45 0.397 1.694 21.29 23.70 0.33 0.92 11.96 13.28 1.0 0.0032 69.4 5.21
NGC 5273 13:42:08.40 +35:39:12.0 0.29 0.512 1.377 21.87 23.27 0.34 0.85 12.44 13.79 -2.0 0.0037 80.3 6.02
NGC 5377 13:56:16.80 +47:14:17.0 1.00 0.561 1.858 23.29 25.14 0.37 0.90 12.24 13.66 1.0 0.0063 137. 10.3
IC 4710 18:28:38.20 -66:58:54.0 0.79 0.632 1.815 22.38 23.92 -0.10 0.57 12.50 12.75 9.0 0.0021 45.6 3.42
NGC 7673 23:27:41.60 +23:35:24.0 0.91 0.155 0.644 19.58 21.92 -0.33 0.41 13.17 12.84 5.0 0.0119 258. 19.4

(a) Unless stated otherwise, all table entries are taken or derived from de RC3 catalogue (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991).

NOTES ON TABLE COLUMNS: (1) galaxy name; (2) and (3) J2000 (RA, DEC) coordinates of the galaxy centers as measured on the Digital Sky Survey (DSS). In a few cases of complex galaxies, galaxy mergers, or galaxies in small groups, the listed coordinates refer to a "center of gravity position", allowing optimal centering inside the WFPC2 FOV; (4) ratio of the minor and major axis isophotal diameter at the SB(B) = 25.0 mag arcsec-2 isophote; (5) re denotes the half-light radius; (6) r25 denotes the radius at the SB(B) = 25.0 mag arcsec-2 isophote; (7) predicted average SB in F300W out to re (see section 2.2); (8) predicted average SB in F300W out to r25 (see Section 2.2); (9) measured Johnson (U - B) aperture color; (10) measured (B - V) aperture color; (11) total B-band magnitude; (12) predicted total F300W magnitude (see Section 2.2); (13) revised galaxy T-type (see also Fig. 2a); (14) Galactocentric galaxy redshift, as derived from the RC3; (15) number of parsec per arcsec at the distance of the galaxy, assuming a Hubble constant of 67 km s-1 Mpc-1; (16) physical size in kpc corresponding to a single WFPC2 CCD of 75" [Col. 16 = Col. 15 × 0.075).

The SB-selection of the sample is illustrated in Fig. 1, which shows the normalized distributions of the predicted average µF300W out to re for the full (54 galaxy) sample and for the 37 galaxies in the Cycle 9 WFPC2 mid-UV sample, and compares these with the distribution over SB derived for the 3009 galaxies in the RC3 with measured BT, (U - B) and re. Clearly, we sample predominantly galaxies with higher SB than the median SB-value in the RC3, which is µF300W appeq 22.3 mag arcsec - 2.

Figure 1

Figure 1. The normalized distribution of the predicted average mid-UV surface brightness (SB) out to re (see Section 2.1.2) for the 37 galaxies observed during HST Cycle 9 (hashed histogram) and for the full galaxy sample (solid histogram), which includes 17 galaxies with mid-UV data taken prior to Cycle 9. For comparison, we also show the SB distribution for the 3009 galaxies in the RC3 with measured BT, (U - B) and re (open histogram). The galaxies were selected to have µF300W ltapprox 23 mag arcsec - 2, allowing us to detect each object in F300W in no more than a single HST orbit. For our purpose of comparing nearby and distant galaxies this imposed SB-bias is justified, since the strong cosmological SB-dimming acts similarly in hiding lower SB objects at high redshifts from deep surveys.

As nearby galaxy samples like the RC3 are also limited by significant SB-selection (Disney 1976, Driver 1999), this thus means that our Cycle 9 HST sample represents only the tip of the local galaxy SB-distribution. Fig. 1 shows that our sample covers only about the brightest 50% SB-percentile seen in the RC3, while it over-represents the highest SB galaxies seen in the RC3. If one wanted to use our sample to represent all galaxies in the RC3 with µF300W leq 23 mag arcsec - 2, one would have to apply weights to each of our galaxies in a given observed SB-bin that could be derived from dividing the two distributions over SB in Fig. 1. This will obviously not work for galaxies with µF300W geq 23 mag arcsec - 2, since almost no galaxies at average SB-levels that faint were observed with HST.

As aforementioned, this SB-selection is justified when the primary goal is to construct a sample for comparison of nearby and high-redshift galaxies, since the strong cosmological SB-dimming limits our view of the high-redshift universe in a similar way (or worse). For example, simulations by Windhorst et al. (2002), who investigate how the galaxies in the present sample would appear to NGST under realistic observing conditions, show that at very high redshifts (z ~ 7-15) only the highest SB mid-UV structures (with average rest-frame µF300W out to re brighter than 20-21 mag arcsec - 2) will be visible to NGST.

Figures 2a-d show the distributions of morphological type, of apparent axis ratio b/a, of the estimated average (U - B) color within the effective radius, and of the effective radius re, within the selected sample. These figures will help the reader to evaluate the usefulness or the weight to apply to individual galaxies in the present sample when using these data for his or her particular purpose. We stress that the present sample is not formally complete and, therefore is not suitable for studies that rely on complete statistics (i.e., studies that cover the complete local galaxy luminosity function or the complete range in local galaxy SB). Nonetheless, important trends are visible in Figs. 2a-2d that will help the reader to make our sample useful for high-redshift comparisons. These trends are:

Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 2d

Figure 2. Other properties of the selected galaxy sample. As in Fig. 1, we present normalized distributions for the Cycle 9 galaxies (hashed), the full sample (solid), and the RC3 (open) of (a) morphological type; (b) apparent axis ratio, b/a; (c) average (U - B) color out to re; and (d) effective radius re. Taking deviations due to small number statistics into account, our sample approximates the RC3 distribution, except that for the purpose of comparison with high redshift objects, we placed extra emphasis on the very latest types, bluest optical galaxy colors, and smallest angular sizes (to fit the FOV of the WFPC2). We also somewhat over-represent highly inclined systems.

Again, any non-representativeness of our galaxy sample compared to the RC3, or to any other galaxy catalog for that matter, can be addressed by applying the appropriate weights to individual galaxies in our sample when comparing it to any other samples. These weights can be determined from the ratios between the observed distributions in Fig. 2a-2d, or between our sample and any other sample than the RC3.

Next Contents Previous