Recent VLA and WSRT deep surveys
(Mitchell and Condon 1985,
Oort 1987)
have extended the 1.4-GHz source count to
S
100 µJy directly and
S
10µJy
statistically (Figure 15.5). The
weighted source count flattens below
S
1 mJy,
suggesting the emergence of a significant low-luminosity source
population - L < 1024 W Hz-1) at
z
1, L
< 1022 W Hz-1 at
z
0.1. This
luminosity range brackets the transition between elliptical and spiral
galaxies in the local radio
luminosity function (Figure 15.3),
so the faint (S < 1 mJy)
sources are likely to be quite different from the strong ones.
Subrahmanya and Kapahi
(1983)
associated the faint sources with nonevolving
spiral galaxies at low redshifts (z < 0.1). Their conclusion
depends on a very steep
local luminosity function (to yield a flat visibility function
for L < 1022 W Hz-1 derived from
Pfleiderer's (1977)
1.4-GHz survey of bright spiral and irregular
galaxies. Such a luminosity function implies much higher space densities
of radio sources with L < 1022 W Hz-1
than the luminosity function based on recent VLA
observations of a similar optical galaxy sample
(Figure 15.3), probably
because confusion by background sources in the larger beam of the NRAO
91-m telescope produces some spurious detections. The 1.4-GHz source
count from nonevolving spiral galaxies described by the newer local
luminosity function is an order of
magnitude lower than the observed count, as indicated by the dotted line in
Figure 15.17. With either luminosity function,
the median redshift of
nonevolving spiral galaxies in the flux-density range 0.1 to 1 mJy is only
<z>0.1. Such a low median redshift does not appear to be
consistent with the magnitude distribution
of galaxies identified with faint sources selected at 1.4 GHz
(Windhorst 1986).
If radio sources in spiral galaxies do evolve at about the same
rate as those in elliptical galaxies
(Condon 1984a,
b),
they can account for the flattening of the source counts below
S 1 mJy
(Figure 15.5) as well as the
higher redshifts
(Figure 15.10) indicated by the
optical-identification magnitude distribution. It
should be emphasized that in this scenario, most of the faint radio
sources are not the "normal" spiral galaxies found in optically
selected catalogues. Typical radio-selected spiral galaxies are those
with L
1022 W Hz-1 found at the peak of the
visibility function, most of which are interacting "starburst" galaxies
(e.g.,
Condon et al. 1982a),
Markarian galaxies, and Seyfert galaxies (e.g.,
Meurs and Wilson 1984).
Since there is a close correlation between the far-infrared
(
= 60 µm)
and radio continuum flux densities of spiral galaxies, radio-selected
spiral galaxies are more
akin to galaxies found in the IRAS survey than to normal spiral galaxies.
A third explanation for the source-count flattening is that there is a "new
population" of radio galaxies with
L
1023 W Hz-1 at
= 1.4 GHz
(Windhorst 1984)
that was somehow missed by the radio luminosity functions derived from
optically selected samples of spiral and elliptical galaxies (e.g.,
Figure 15.3) or Markarian and
Seyfert galaxies
(Meurs and Wilson 1984).
Using spectroscopy and
four-band photographic photometry of galaxies identified with radio sources
stronger than S = 0.6 mJy
(Kron et al. 1985),
Windhorst (1984)
estimated that the
local space density of radio sources associated with his "blue galaxy"
identifications exceeds that of radio sources in known spiral and
elliptical galaxies by an order of magnitude in the luminosity range
L
1022 to 1023 W Hz-1. Only a moderate
amount of evolution is needed for such a population to account for the
source counts below
S
5 mJy
(Windhorst et al. 1985).
The morphological composition of the blue radio-galaxy population is still
unclear, and it may vary with both flux density and apparent
magnitude. Those galaxies brighter than
F 16 mag are
spiral galaxies; the
fainter identifications "are often of peculiar compact morphology,
sometimes interacting or merging" and have
optical luminosities about equal to those of bright spiral galaxies
(Windhorst 1984,
Kron et al. 1985).
Some of the faintest may be blue broad-line radio galaxies
similar to those found in strong-source samples
(Wall et al. 1986),
photometrically misclassified elliptical galaxies
(Kron et al. 1985),
or misidentifications
(Wall et al. 1986,
Windhorst 1986,
Weistrop et al. 1987).
While the blue galaxies gradually
displace red elliptical galaxies as the dominant population in faint
radio-selected samples, it is not clear that they are a new population
in the sense of surpassing the known local radio luminosity function near
L
1023 W
Hz-1. If a weakly evolving population is significant in radio
flux-limited samples at cosmological distances, it
probably should be significant even in the small samples of optically
bright galaxies used to construct the local luminosity function. Also,
the radio identifications of the large (N
104) UGC galaxy sample
(Nilson 1973)
south of
= + 82°
with sources stronger than S = 150 mJy at
= 1.4 GHz
(Broderick and Condon, manuscript in
preparation) do not appear to be consistent with a factor-of-ten
increase in the local luminosity function near
L = 1023 W Hz-1. The UGC galaxies
actually detected in this luminosity range are classified by Nilson as a
mixture of active spirals, elliptical,
S0, and "compact" galaxies. If the radio sources in this mixture evolve,
they may account for most of the blue radio galaxies seen at
cosmological distances in deep surveys. Because there is such a sharp
decline in the luminosity function of spiral galaxies above L
1023 W
Hz-1 the blue galaxy
population identified with sources in the 1 to 10 mJy range by
Kron et al. (1985)
probably contains a smaller fraction
of spiral galaxies than sub-mJy samples do.
A sharp distinction between radio-emitting spiral and elliptical
galaxies can be made by the relative strengths of their far-infrared
emission - nearly all infrared-selected galaxies with detectable radio
sources are spirals, not ellipticals. Furthermore, there is a remarkably
tight correlation between the far-infrared and radio
continuum flux densities of spiral galaxies. For infrared-selected
spirals, the quantity
u
log(S60 µm / S1.4GHz) has a
median value <u> = + 2.15 ± 0.15 and a scatter
u < 0.3
(Condon and Broderick
1986).
Biermann et al. (1985)
used the infrared-radio correlation and a static Euclidean extrapolation
of the
= 60
µm source count to predict that spiral galaxies will
contribute significantly to the 5-GHz source count below
S
100
µJy. Now that the
= 60 µn
source count has been extended to S = 50 mJy
(Hacking et al. 1987),
the contribution of infrared-selected spiral
galaxies to the 1.4-GHz count of sources as faint as S = 50 mJy /
dex(u) = 0.35 mJy
can be estimated directly from the infrared data - the weighted count
scales as u-3/2,
so S5/2 n(S |
= 1.4 GHz)
1. At least 20% of the
radio sources with
S
0.35 mJy
at
= 1.4 GHz can be
identified with spiral galaxies in this way; if
u > 0, the
percentage rises. Finally, the
= 60 µn
source count is
consistent with strong evolution of infrared-selected spiral galaxies
(Hacking et al. 1987).